IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/ijcejl/v3y2020i1p65-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Survey on the Study Habits of the Taiwanese University Students: Comparison of the Four Years of Undergraduate Education

Author

Listed:
  • Abolfazl Shirban Sasi
  • Shu-Ting Hsu

Abstract

This study was conducted in order to examine the probable differences among the study habits of students on different academic levels- freshmen, sophomores, juniors, and seniors in Taiwanese universities. Thus, 14 departments were randomly chosen in three universities in central Taiwan. In total, 964 respondents were considered in this study. The research instrument was a 24-item questionnaire adopted from the Study Skill Assessment Questionnaire, originally developed by University of Houston Clear Lake, Texas. The questionnaire items used in this study clustered three study habits/skills constructs (eight items each) which were- time management and procrastination, study aids and note-taking, and organizing and processing information. Applying a Pearson Chi-square test (a ≤.05) for each of the 24 items of the questionnaire, it was revealed that there is no significant difference among students of different years with respect to item 4 (preparing a “to do†list), item 18 (breaking assignments into manageable parts), and item 22 (using questions to better organize and understand studying material). As for the other 21 items of the questionnaire, the subjects’ responses varied with a low significance, showing a little difference in study habits among the students of four levels of undergraduate education. Furthermore, and using the rubrics suggested by the original questionnaire developer, it was measured that the lowest score for all of the surveyed constructs was 18.74 (low range) for sophomores on “study aids and note-taking†, while the highest score was 26.26 (medium-high range) for seniors on “organizing and processing information†.

Suggested Citation

  • Abolfazl Shirban Sasi & Shu-Ting Hsu, 2020. "A Survey on the Study Habits of the Taiwanese University Students: Comparison of the Four Years of Undergraduate Education," International Journal of Contemporary Education, Redfame publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 65-74, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:ijcejl:v:3:y:2020:i:1:p:65-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijce/article/download/4728/4967
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijce/article/view/4728
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdullah Baothman & Hatim AlJefri & Sajiga Agha & Muhammad Anwar Khan, 2018. "Study Habits of Health Science Students at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hikmet YaÅŸar & Mustafa SaÄŸsan, 2020. "The Mediating Effect of Organizational Stress on Organizational Culture and Time Management: A Comparative Study With Two Universities," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    2. Richelle V. Adams & Erik Blair, 2019. "Impact of Time Management Behaviors on Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440188, January.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:ijcejl:v:3:y:2020:i:1:p:65-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.