IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rai/indbez/doi_10.1688-1862-0035_indb_2011_03_rami.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vertrauen als Legitimation fuer die Betriebsratsarbeit (Trust as a Source of Legitimacy for Works Councils)

Author

Listed:
  • Ursula Rami
  • Andreas Hunger

Abstract

In vielen Betrieben nimmt man eine Verschiebung der Betriebsratsfunktion von der konventionellen Interessenvertretung (‘Schutz’) hin zu einem Co-Management (‘Gestaltung’) wahr. Die Frage der Legitimation bleibt dabei weiterhin aktuell. Neben periodischen Wahlen kann durch die Miteinbeziehung des (Waehler-)Vertrauens eine kontinuierliche Legitimation erfasst werden. Vertrauen kommt innerhalb der Beziehungen zwischen Betriebsrat und Belegschaft eine wesentliche Stabilisierungsfunktion zu. Diese Sicht wurde in bisherigen Betriebsratsstudien nur wenig beruecksichtigt. Unter Miteinbeziehung mehrerer Vertrauenstheorien wurde eine quantitative Studie konzipiert. Durch ein theoretisches Sampling wurden zwei Tochterbetriebe der Voestalpine AG fuer eine Befragung ausgewaehlt. Neben der Unternehmensgeschichte, der Unternehmensbranche, der Unternehmenskultur und betriebsspezifischen Gegebenheiten seitens der Betriebsratsgremien nimmt der Aspekt des Vertrauens in den Betriebsrat einen wesentlichen Einfluss auf die Wahrnehmung der Betriebsratsarbeit. Dieses Vertrauen bedarf der Transparenz und der Praesenz des Betriebsrats. Wissenschaftlich gesehen bewaehrt sich der Begriff ‘Vertrauen’ als zentrales theoretisches Konzept bei Betriebsratsthemen, wenngleich er naeher an die alltagsweltlichen Bedeutungsfelder herangefuehrt werden sollte. (In many companies there has been a noticeable shift in the function of works councils from more conventional interest representation (‘protection’) towards co-management (‘shaping’). Nevertheless, the question of legitimacy remains an issue. Besides recurrent elections, continuous legitimacy can be created through the trust of the electorate. Trust is important to stabilise the relationship between the works council and employees. However, this need has been downplayed so far in studies of works councils. Partially inspired by different theories of trust, we designed a quantitative study on the subject. Through theoretical sampling we selected two subsidiaries of the Voestalpine AG for the survey. Besides the history of the company, the relevant sector, the entrepreneurial culture and characteristics specific to the workplace, trust in the work council is important to how its work is perceived. This trust requires transparency and the presence of the works council. From a scientific point of view ‘trust’ is confirmed as a pivotal theoretical concept, even though it should be brought closer to its meaning in daily life.)

Suggested Citation

  • Ursula Rami & Andreas Hunger, 2011. "Vertrauen als Legitimation fuer die Betriebsratsarbeit (Trust as a Source of Legitimacy for Works Councils)," Industrielle Beziehungen - Zeitschrift fuer Arbeit, Organisation und Management - The German Journal of Industrial Relations, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 18(3), pages 167-189.
  • Handle: RePEc:rai:indbez:doi_10.1688/1862-0035_indb_2011_03_rami
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/hampp_e-journals_IndB.htm#311
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    trust; works councils; legitimacy; co-determination;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J53 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Labor-Management Relations; Industrial Jurisprudence
    • J83 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Workers' Rights
    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)
    • P00 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rai:indbez:doi_10.1688/1862-0035_indb_2011_03_rami. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rainer Hampp (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.