IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/reveco/reco_0035-2764_2002_num_53_2_410407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Le principe de rationalité et l'unité des sciences sociales

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Mongin

Abstract

[fre] Le principe de rationalité et l'unité des sciences sociales L'article réexamine le principe de rationalité sous l'angle particulier de l'unité des sciences sociales. On a pu défendre l'idée que le principe constituait l'unique loi des sciences sociales, de sorte que celles-ci ne se distingueraient pas profondément entre elles (Popper). On a tout aussi bien défendu l'idée que le principe séparait l'économie, vue comme science des actions rationnelles, et les autres sciences sociales, notamment la sociologie (Pareto). L'article récuse ces thèses opposées à partir de deux considérations générales : le principe a un caractère strictement métaphysique et il n'a pas la force logique requise pour qu'on en tire des déductions intéressantes. L'explication dans les sciences sociales se place à un niveau de spécificité toujours plus grand que celui du principe lui-même. Mais elle se distingue en économie par un degré de spécification extrême des schèmes rationnels qui sous-tendent l'explication ; il en résulte un va-et-vient entre le particulier et le général qui n'a pas d'analogue dans les autres sciences sociales. [eng] The rationality principle and the unity of the social sciences The paper revisits the rationality principle from the particular perspective ofthe unity of social sciences. It has been argued that the principle was the unique law of the social sciences and that accordingly there are no deep differences between them (Popper). It has also been argued that the rationality principle was specifie to economics as opposed to the other social sciences, especially sociology (Pareto). The paper rejects these opposite views on the grounds that the rationality principle is strictly metaphysical and does not have the logical force required to deliver interesting deductions. Explanation in the social sciences takes place at a level of specialization that is always higher than that of the principle itself. However, what is peculiar about economies is that it specializes the explanatory rational schemes to a degree unparalled in history and sociology. As a consequence, there is a backward-and-forward move between specifie and general formulations of rationality that takes place in economics and has no analogue in the other social sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Mongin, 2002. "Le principe de rationalité et l'unité des sciences sociales," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 53(2), pages 301-323.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2002_num_53_2_410407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.persee.fr/doc/reco_0035-2764_2002_num_53_2_410407
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mongin, P & d'Aspremont, C, 1996. "Utility Theory and Ethics," Papers 9632, Paris X - Nanterre, U.F.R. de Sc. Ec. Gest. Maths Infor..
    2. Marc Fleurbaey & François Maniquet, 2006. "Compensation and responsibility," Working Papers halshs-00121367, HAL.
    3. FLEURBAEY, Marc & MANIQUET, François, 1998. "Optimal income taxation: and ordinal approach," CORE Discussion Papers 1998065, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Fleurbaey, Marc, 1995. "Equal Opportunity or Equal Social Outcome?," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(01), pages 25-55, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christophe Schinckus & Çınla Akdere, 2015. "Towards a New Way of Teaching Statistics in Economics: The Case for Econophysics," Ekonomi-tek - International Economics Journal, Turkish Economic Association, vol. 4(3), pages 89-108, September.
    2. Philippe Mongin, 2011. "La théorie de la décision et la psychologie du sens commun," Working Papers hal-00625445, HAL.
    3. Mongin, Philippe, 2007. "Une étude d'histoire militaire instruite par la Théorie des jeux et quelques amplifications Méthodologiques," Les Cahiers de Recherche 866, HEC Paris.
    4. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "Une conception néo-poppérienne de l'explication en sciences sociales et ses difficultés internes," Working Papers hal-00712032, HAL.
    5. Christophe Schinckus, 2011. "What can econophysics contribute to financial economics?," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 58(2), pages 147-163, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2002_num_53_2_410407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: http://www.persee.fr/collection/reco .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.