IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recofi/ecofi_0987-3368_2008_num_91_1_5065.html

Pression fiscale sur les revenus de l'épargne : une estimation dans trois pays européens

Author

Listed:
  • Yannick L’Horty

Abstract

[fre] Cette étude mesure le poids réel des prélèvements obligatoires sur les revenus de l’épargne dans trois pays (France, Royaume-Uni et Italie) pour trois années (1998, 1999 et 2000) et pour une partition des produits d’épargne en quatre catégories. On mobilise deux méthodes complémentaires : les taux marginaux de prélèvements sont calculés ex ante en utilisant le barème légal des prélèvements ; les taux moyens de prélèvements sont calculés . ex post en rapportant le montant des prélèvements à celui des revenus tels qu’ils peuvent être évalués à l’aide des sources comptables et fiscales. Alors que le montant des prélèvements obligatoires sur les revenus d’épargne est assez proche dans les trois pays, les revenus de l’épargne sont beaucoup plus importants au Royaume-Uni qu’en France ou en Italie. Les taux moyens d’imposition réels (TMIR) sont donc plus élevés en France (10,8 %) et en Italie (9,4 %) qu’au Royaume-Uni (7,4 %). Avec le cumul de prélèvements sociaux à taux modéré et assiette large et de prélèvements fiscaux à taux élevé mais à emprise limitée, compte tenu de l’ampleur des exemptions, la fiscalité française a finalement un rendement comparable à celles, plus homogènes, du Royaume-Uni et de l’Italie. . Classification JEL : E21, E62, H2, H3, H87 [eng] Fiscal pressure on savings income : estimation for three European countries . We measure the fiscal pressure on savings income in three countries (France, Italy and the UK) during three years (1998, 1999 and 2000) and for four classes of saving products. We use two complementary methods : marginal tax rates are computed ex ante using legal tax rates ; real average tax rates are computed ex post using data from public account and fiscal administration. Despite an amount of taxes which is very close among countries, income savings are larger in the UK than in France or Italy. Then, real average tax rates are higher in France (10.8%) and Italy (9.4%) than in the UK (7.4%). Cumulating social taxes at a weak rate but on a large establishment and fiscal taxes at a high rate but on a narrow basis, due to exemptions, French taxation system has finally the same return than the UK or Italian more homogeneous tax system. . Classification JEL : E21, E62, H2, H3, H87

Suggested Citation

  • Yannick L’Horty, 2008. "Pression fiscale sur les revenus de l'épargne : une estimation dans trois pays européens," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 91(1), pages 165-189.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2008_num_91_1_5065
    DOI: 10.3406/ecofi.2008.5065
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecofi.2008.5065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecofi.2008.5065
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecofi_0987-3368_2008_num_91_1_5065
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecofi.2008.5065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mervyn A. King & Don Fullerton, 1984. "The United Kingdom," NBER Chapters, in: The Taxation of Income from Capital: A Comparative Study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Germany, pages 31-86, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Thierry Laurent & Yannick L’HORTY, 2002. "Taxation of Savings Products: An International Comparison," Documents de recherche 02-16, Centre d'Études des Politiques Économiques (EPEE), Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne.
    3. Mervyn A. King & Don Fullerton, 1984. "Introduction to "The Taxation of Income from Capital: A Comparative Study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Germany"," NBER Chapters, in: The Taxation of Income from Capital: A Comparative Study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Germany, pages 1-6, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Mervyn A. King & Don Fullerton, 1984. "The United States," NBER Chapters, in: The Taxation of Income from Capital: A Comparative Study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Germany, pages 193-267, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Mervyn A. King & Don Fullerton, 1984. "The Taxation of Income from Capital: A Comparative Study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Germany," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number king84-1, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    2. Henrekson, Magnus & Johansson, Dan, 2010. "Firm Growth, Institutions and Structural Transformation," Ratio Working Papers 150, The Ratio Institute.
    3. Henrekson, Magnus & Johansson, Dan, 1999. "Institutional Effects on the Evolution of the Size Distribution of Firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 11-23, February.
    4. repec:ecr:col037:5367 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. John B. Burbidge & Kirk A. Collins & James B. Davies & Lonnie Magee, 2012. "Effective tax and subsidy rates on human capital in Canada," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 45(1), pages 189-219, February.
    6. R Jackman, 1987. "Paying for Local Government: An Appraisal of the British Government's Proposals for Nondomestic Rates," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 5(1), pages 89-98, March.
    7. Matt Benge, 1998. "Depreciation Provisions and Investment Incentives under Full Imputation," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 74(227), pages 329-345, December.
    8. Ellen R. McGrattan & Edward C. Prescott, 2005. "Taxes, Regulations, and the Value of U.S. and U.K. Corporations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 72(3), pages 767-796.
    9. Philip Bunn & Garry Young, 2004. "Corporate capital structure in the United Kingdom: determinants and adjustment," Bank of England working papers 226, Bank of England.
    10. Ligia Alba Melo-Becerra & Héctor Zárate-Solano & Andrés Camilo Gómez-Molina, 2018. "Elasticidad del ingreso corporativo gravable en Colombia," Borradores de Economia 1046, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    11. Magnus Henrekson & Tino Sanandaji, 2011. "Entrepreneurship and the theory of taxation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 167-185, September.
    12. Niklas Elert & Magnus Henrekson, 2019. "The collaborative innovation bloc: A new mission for Austrian economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 295-320, December.
    13. Thomann Christian, 2014. "Recent developments in Corporate Taxation in Sweden," Nordic Tax Journal, Sciendo, vol. 2014(2), pages 195-214, November.
    14. Magnus Henrekson & Jesper Roine, 2007. "Promoting Entrepreneurship in the Welfare State," Chapters, in: David B. Audretsch & Isabel Grilo & A. Roy Thurik (ed.), Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Jost HECKEMEYER & Katharina FINKE & Christoph SPENGEL, 2010. "ZEW TaxCoMM - A Corporate Tax Microsimulation Model. Concept and Application to the 2008 German Corporate Tax Reform," EcoMod2010 259600072, EcoMod.
    16. Polito, Vito, 2011. "Deferred Taxation and Effective Tax Rates on Income from Capital in the United States, 2000-2010," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2011/14, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    17. Lewe, Stefan, 2003. "Wachstumseffiziente Unternehmensbesteuerung," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 20042, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    18. Darrel Cohen & Kevin Hassett & R. Glenn Hubbard, 1999. "Inflation and the User Cost of Capital: Does Inflation Still Matter?," NBER Chapters, in: The Costs and Benefits of Price Stability, pages 199-234, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Luis Alvarez & Vesa Kanniainen & Jan Södersten, 1999. "Why is the Corporation Tax Not Neutral?. Anticipated Tax Reform, Investment Spurts and Corporate Borrowing," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 56(3/4), pages 285-285, July.
    20. James Alm & Mir Ahmad Khan, 2015. "Assessing and Reforming Enterprise Taxation in Pakistan," Working Papers 1513, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    21. Henrekson, Magnus & Rosenberg, Nathan, 2000. "Incentives for Academic Entrepreneurship and Economic Performance: Sweden and the United States," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 362, Stockholm School of Economics.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth
    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • H3 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents
    • H87 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - International Fiscal Issues; International Public Goods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2008_num_91_1_5065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecofi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.