IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recofi/ecofi_0987-3368_2000_num_60_5_3659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les modèles d’assurance des dépôts. Présentation du nouveau système en vigueur en France

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvie Mathérat
  • Vitchett Oung

Abstract

[eng] Deposit insurance . Although deposit insurance schemes are theoretically redundant with capital adequacy standards, experience showed that a system combining both approaches was necessary in maintaining financial stability. Applications of regulations on the subject vary in countries concerned. As regards deposit insurance schemes however, models implementing risk related premium - more effective but more costly to maintain - are developing. The new French deposit insurance scheme is in line with this trend, by establishing deposit insurance premia which are based not only on deposits but also on the level of risk specific to each credit institution. The level of risk is determined by different parameters which are solvency, profitability, risk diversification and transformation. . Classification JEL : G28 [fre] Bien qu’en théorie un système de garantie des dépôts soit redondant avec des normes d’adéquation des fonds propres, l’expérience a montré qu’un système combinant les deux approches était nécessaire au maintien de la stabilité financière globale. Les modalités respectives de ces types de réglementation varient actuellement selon les pays concernés. Cependant, s’agissant des systèmes de garantie des dépôts, les modèles mettant en oeuvre des primes d’assurance proportionnelles aux risques, qui constituent les dispositifs les plus efficaces, mais aussi les plus coûteux à maintenir, se développent. À cet égard, le nouveau système français de garantie des dépôts se situe dans cette logique, en instituant des primes fondées, bien sûr, sur le montant des dépôts, mais également proportionnelles aux risques générés par les établissements. Ces risques sont estimés en fonction de différents paramètres : la solvabilité, la rentabilité d’exploitation, la division des risques et la transformation. . Classification JEL : G28

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvie Mathérat & Vitchett Oung, 2000. "Les modèles d’assurance des dépôts. Présentation du nouveau système en vigueur en France," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 60(5), pages 225-236.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2000_num_60_5_3659
    DOI: 10.3406/ecofi.2000.3659
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecofi.2000.3659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecofi.2000.3659
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecofi_0987-3368_2000_num_60_5_3659
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecofi.2000.3659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul H. Kupiec & James M. O'Brien, 1998. "Deposit insurance, bank incentives, and the design of regulatory policy," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 4(Oct), pages 201-211.
    2. Berlin, Mitchell & Saunders, Anthony & Udell, Gregory F., 1991. "Deposit insurance reform: What are the issues and what needs to be fixed?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(4-5), pages 735-752, September.
    3. Kendall, Sarah B. & Levonian, Mark E., 1991. "A simple approach to better deposit insurance pricing," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(4-5), pages 999-1018, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvie Mathérat & Vitchett Oung, 2000. "An Overview of France’s New Deposit Insurance System," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 60(5), pages 221-232.
    2. Ben Schreiber, 1997. "The Owner–Manager Conflict in Insured Banks: Predetermined Salary versus Bonus Payments," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 12(2), pages 303-326, October.
    3. Ari Hyytinen & Tuomas Takalo, 2002. "Enhancing Bank Transparency: A Re-assessment," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 6(3), pages 429-445.
    4. Epps, T. W. & Pulley, Lawrence B. & Humphrey, David B., 1996. "Assessing the FDIC's premium and examination policies using 'Soviet' put options," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 699-721, May.
    5. Georges Dionne, 2003. "The Foundationsof Banks' Risk Regulation: A Review of Literature," THEMA Working Papers 2003-46, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    6. Ben Z. Schreiber, 1996. "The Owner-Manager Conflict in Insured Banks: Predetermined Salary vs. Bonus Payments," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 96-38, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    7. Westman, Hanna, 2011. "The impact of management and board ownership on profitability in banks with different strategies," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 3300-3318.
    8. Freixas, Xavier & Gabillon, Emmanuelle, 1999. "Optimal Regulation of a Fully Insured Deposit Banking System," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 111-134, September.
    9. Burcu Aydin & Mr. Myeongsuk Kim & Mr. Ho-Seong Moon, 2011. "Financial Linkages Across Korean Banks," IMF Working Papers 2011/201, International Monetary Fund.
    10. Mark E. Levonian, 1991. "Have large banks become riskier? recent evidence from option markets," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Fall, pages 3-17.
    11. Paul S. Calem & Rafael Rob, "undated". "The Impact of Capital-Based Regulation on Bank Risk-Taking: A Dynamic Model," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 1996-12, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), revised 04 Dec 2019.
    12. Kane, Edward J., 2006. "Inadequacy of nation-based and VaR-based safety nets in the European Union," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 375-387, December.
    13. Knorr Andreas, 1999. "Staatliche Bankenaufsicht – eine effiziente Institution?," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 50(1), pages 345-370, January.
    14. International Association of Deposit Insurers, 2020. "Evaluation of Differential Premium Systems for Deposit Insurance," IADI Research Papers 20-06, International Association of Deposit Insurers.
    15. Hyytinen, Ari & Takalo, Tuomas, 2001. "Preventing Systemic Crises through Bank Transparency," Discussion Papers 776, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    16. Loriana Pelizzon & Stephen Schaefer, 2005. "Pillar 1 vs. Pillar 2 Under Risk Management," NBER Working Papers 11666, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Javier Suárez, 1998. "Risk-taking and the prudential regulation of banks," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 22(3), pages 307-336, September.
    18. Camara, Antonio & Davidson, Travis & Fodor, Andrew, 2020. "Bank asset structure and deposit insurance pricing," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    19. Vittas, Dimitri, 1992. "Policy issues in financial regulation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 910, The World Bank.
    20. Arturo Estrella, 1998. "The Future of Regulatory Capital: General Principles and Specific Proposals," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 134(IV), pages 599-616, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2000_num_60_5_3659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecofi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.