IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Les modèles d’assurance des dépôts. Présentation du nouveau système en vigueur en France

Listed author(s):
  • Sylvie Mathérat
  • Vitchett Oung
Registered author(s):

    [fre] Bien qu’en théorie un système de garantie des dépôts soit redondant avec des normes d’adéquation des fonds propres, l’expérience a montré qu’un système combinant les deux approches était nécessaire au maintien de la stabilité financière globale. Les modalités respectives de ces types de réglementation varient actuellement selon les pays concernés. Cependant, s’agissant des systèmes de garantie des dépôts, les modèles mettant en oeuvre des primes d’assurance proportionnelles aux risques, qui constituent les dispositifs les plus efficaces, mais aussi les plus coûteux à maintenir, se développent. À cet égard, le nouveau système français de garantie des dépôts se situe dans cette logique, en instituant des primes fondées, bien sûr, sur le montant des dépôts, mais également proportionnelles aux risques générés par les établissements. Ces risques sont estimés en fonction de différents paramètres : la solvabilité, la rentabilité d’exploitation, la division des risques et la transformation. Classification JEL : G28 [eng] Deposit insurance Although deposit insurance schemes are theoretically redundant with capital adequacy standards, experience showed that a system combining both approaches was necessary in maintaining financial stability. Applications of regulations on the subject vary in countries concerned. As regards deposit insurance schemes however, models implementing risk related premium - more effective but more costly to maintain - are developing. The new French deposit insurance scheme is in line with this trend, by establishing deposit insurance premia which are based not only on deposits but also on the level of risk specific to each credit institution. The level of risk is determined by different parameters which are solvency, profitability, risk diversification and transformation. Classification JEL : G28

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue d'économie financière.

    Volume (Year): 60 (2000)
    Issue (Month): 5 ()
    Pages: 225-236

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2000_num_60_5_3659
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecofi.2000.3659
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Paul H. Kupiec & James M. O'Brien, 1998. "Deposit insurance, bank incentives, and the design of regulatory policy," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, issue Oct, pages 201-211.
    2. Berlin, Mitchell & Saunders, Anthony & Udell, Gregory F., 1991. "Deposit insurance reform: What are the issues and what needs to be fixed?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(4-5), pages 735-752, September.
    3. Kendall, Sarah B. & Levonian, Mark E., 1991. "A simple approach to better deposit insurance pricing," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(4-5), pages 999-1018, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2000_num_60_5_3659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.