IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Makes Research Socially Useful ? Complementarities between in-House Research and Firm-University Collaboration in Biotechnology


  • Michelle Gittelman


[eng] This paper analyses the published scientific papers of a large sample of biotechnology firms to study the relationship between firm-level research capabilities and collaboration with university scientists. The study presents new findings on the relationship of firm age, research capabilities, and collaboration. Firm-level research capabilities are measured as citations to papers. Younger firms publish more highlycited papers, supporting a view of firm founding to exploit new knowledge at the frontier of discovery. Collaboration with academic researchers increases citations to firm-authored papers, but only for firms with weaker in-house research capabilities. Firms with strong internal research capabilities do not benefit (in terms of increased citations) from collaboration, but are much more likely to collaborate with scientists at prestigious universities. The results show that firm-university collaboration involves knowledge transfer for some firms. At the same time, ties between firms and academic scientists may not represent an efficient mode of knowledge transfer as much as the adoption of the norms of open science by firms, whether as a strategy to gain privileged entry into scientific networks or simply because their managers are scientists who have a taste for academic research. [fre] Cet article se base sur les publications scientifiques d'un échantillon important d'entreprises de biotechnologies. Il étudie la relation entre les capacités de recherche privée et l'intensité des collaborations entre scientifiques privés et universitaires. L'étude présente des résultats originaux montrant l'existence d'une relation positive entre l'âge de l'entreprise, ses capacités de recherche et l'intensité de ses collaborations avec les universitaires. Les capacités de recherche de la firme sont mesurées à partir des citations de leurs articles publiés. Nous trouvons qu'en moyenne, ce sont les entreprises les plus jeunes qui publient les articles les plus cités, confirmant ainsi l'idée que les entreprises en création ont tendance à exploiter des connaissances à la frontière des découvertes. Par ailleurs, les collaborations avec les chercheurs académiques contribuent en effet à augmenter le nombre de citations des articles publiés par les entreprises, mais seulement pour les firmes aux capacités de recherche internes relativement faibles. Les entreprises aux fortes capacités internes de recherche bénéficient peu de ces collaborations (au sens où le nombre de citations de leurs publications n'augmente pas), mais ces dernières ont plus de chance de s'effectuer avec des scientifiques travaillant dans les universités les plus prestigieuses. Les résultats prouvent enfin que les collaborations entre entreprise et université conduisent à des transferts de connaissance dans certains cas. Il arrive aussi que les liens entre les entreprises et les scientifiques académiques ne représentent pas un mode de transfert aussi efficace que l'adoption par les entreprises de normes de libre accès scientifique, que ce soit en tant que stratégie pour accéder de façon privilégiée aux réseaux de recherche valorisables ou simplement parce que les managers sont des scientifiques qui ont un goût prononcé pour la recherche académique.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle Gittelman, 2005. "What Makes Research Socially Useful ? Complementarities between in-House Research and Firm-University Collaboration in Biotechnology," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 110(1), pages 57-73.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:recind:rei_0154-3229_2005_num_110_1_3072 Note: DOI:10.3406/rei.2005.3072

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Langlois, Richard N., 2002. "Modularity in technology and organization," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 19-37, September.
    2. Gary S. Becker & Kevin M. Murphy, 1994. "The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge," NBER Chapters,in: Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education (3rd Edition), pages 299-322 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Philippe Moati, 2001. "Organiser les marchés dans une économie fondée sur la connaissance : le rôle clé des « intégrateurs »," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 97(1), pages 123-138.
    4. Richard N. Langlois, 2004. "Competition through Institutional Form: the Case of Cluster Tool Standards," Working papers 2004-10, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    5. Timothy J. Sturgeon, 2002. "Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 451-496, June.
    6. Richard N. Langlois, 2003. "The vanishing hand: the changing dynamics of industrial capitalism," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 351-385, April.
    7. Peter Galvin & Andre Morkel, 2001. "Modularity On Industry Structure: The Case Of The World The Effect Of Product Bicycle Industry," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 31-47.
    8. Vincent Frigant, 2003. "Défection et prise de parole dans les relations verticales interfirmes : propositions pour une transposition du modèle d'Hirschman," Post-Print hal-00257475, HAL.
    9. Richardson, G B, 1972. "The Organisation of Industry," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(327), pages 883-896, September.
    10. Vincent Frigant, 2004. "Une géographie économique de la modularisation : une analyse de l'internationalisation des équipementiers automobiles en termes de proximité," Post-Print hal-00246123, HAL.
    11. Langlois, Richard N. & Robertson, Paul L., 1992. "Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 297-313, August.
    12. Brusoni, Stefano & Prencipe, Andrea, 2001. "Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products and Organizations," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 179-205, March.
    13. Ulrich, Karl, 1995. "The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 419-440, May.
    14. Schaefer, Scott, 1999. "Product design partitions with complementary components," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 311-330, March.
    15. Eric von Hippel, 1994. ""Sticky Information" and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 429-439, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Fassio, Claudio & Geuna, Aldo & Rossi, Federica, 2014. "The Contribution of Academic Knowledge to the Value of Industry Inventions: Micro level evidence from patent inventors," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201408, University of Turin.
    2. Sandrine Labory, 2011. "Role of external knowledge flows in cluster upgrading: an empirical analysis of the Mirandola biomedical district in Italy," Working Papers 2011R05, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
    3. Rosamaria D’Amore & Roberto Iorio & Sandrine Labory & Agnieszka Stawinoga, 2012. "How Do The Institutions Involved In Scientific Collaboration Deal With Different Kinds Of Distance? An Analysis Of The Co-Autorships Of Scientific Publications," Working Papers 3_222, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Statistiche, Università degli Studi di Salerno.
    4. Rosamaria D’Amore & Roberto Iorio & Agnieszka Stawinoga, 2012. "Who And Where Are The Co-Authors? The Relationship Between Institutional And Geographical Distance In Scientific Publications," Working Papers 3_221, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Statistiche, Università degli Studi di Salerno.
    5. Sandrine Labory, 2011. "Role of external knowledge flows in cluster upgrading: an empirical analysis of the Mirandola biomedical district in Italy," Working Papers 201114, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    6. Rosamaria D’Amore & Roberto Iorio, 2014. "New Insights On The Relationships Between Geographic And Institutional Distance In Research Collaborations:A Long Period Analysis," Working Papers 3_229, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Statistiche, Università degli Studi di Salerno.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recind:rei_0154-3229_2005_num_110_1_3072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.