IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les propositions communautaires d'harmonisation de la TVA


  • Michel Lazare
  • Didier Maillard
  • Thierry Pujol


[fre] Pour permettre la réalisation du marché unique sans frontières, la Commission a tracé les grandes lignes d'une réforme de la fiscalité indirecte : réduction du nombre de taux de TVA, définition d'une fourchette de taux et redéfinition de la taxation des échanges intracommunautaires. Une telle réforme pose un problème dans un pays comme la France caractérisé par la conjonction du niveau élevé des prélèvements obligatoires et du poids de la fiscalité indirecte. D'où un dilemme : accepter des pertes de recettes budgétaires qui pourraient atteindre dans certaines configurations 1 00 milliards de F, ou accroître le recours à la fiscalité directe, avec les problèmes économiques et redistributifs que cela soulève.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Lazare & Didier Maillard & Thierry Pujol, 1989. "Les propositions communautaires d'harmonisation de la TVA," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 217(1), pages 117-125.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1989_num_217_1_5291
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.1989.5291
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1989.5291

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Véronique Nichèle & Jean-Marc Robin, 1993. "Évaluation des effets budgétaires et redistributifs de réformes de la fiscalité indirecte française," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 110(4), pages 105-128.
    2. Nichele, Veronique & Robin, Jean-Marc, 1995. "Simulation of indirect tax reforms using pooled micro and macro French data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 225-244, February.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1989_num_217_1_5291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.