IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0344043.html

Geographical barriers and multimorbidity in quilombola territories of the amazon region

Author

Listed:
  • Leanna Silva Aquino
  • Ellen Mara Fernandes da Silva
  • Victoria Valentim Aguiar
  • Cesar Ferreira Fernandes Filho
  • Sheyla Mara Silva de Oliveira
  • Tatiane Costa Quaresma
  • Valney Mara Gomes Conde
  • Nádia Vicência do Nascimento Martins
  • Marcos Manoel Honorato
  • Veridiana Barreto do Nascimento
  • Guilherme Augusto Barros Conde
  • Franciane de Paula Fernandes
  • Lívia de Aguiar Valentim

Abstract

Background: Quilombola communities in the Brazilian Amazon face persistent social and territorial inequities that shape health outcomes and access to care. Geographic isolation, limited transportation, centralization of specialized services, and socioeconomic disadvantages contribute to unequal opportunities for timely diagnosis and treatment. Understanding how these determinants interact with patterns of multimorbidity is essential for guiding equiTable health policies and strengthening primary care in remote territories. Methods: A cross-sectional epidemiological study was conducted with 518 adults from nine quilombola communities in Santarém, Pará. Data were collected through household surveys addressing sociodemographics, self-reported diseases, service utilization and resolvability. Geographic coordinates of communities and health services were mapped to classify accessibility as high, medium or low. Diseases were converted into a binary matrix to estimate prevalence and identify multimorbidity (≥2 conditions). Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, ANOVA, Spearman correlations and heatmap visualization. A Composite Access Index (CAI) integrating geographic distance, epidemiological burden and service-use indicators was developed. A Random Forest model was used to identify conditions most strongly associated with multimorbidity. Results: Communities showed marked territorial heterogeneity. Pérola do Maicá had the highest accessibility, while Ituqui, Tiningu and Murumuru presented substantial geographic and logistical barriers. Service utilization ranged from 42.9% to 95.0%, and most communities relied on care outside their territory (70–95%). Complete problem resolution was reported by 72.5% of participants, though with variation among communities. The CAI identified Ituqui (0.550), Tiningu (0.480) and Murumurutuba (0.331) as the most vulnerable territories. The Random Forest model achieved 93.6% accuracy, with hypertension, diabetes, musculoskeletal diseases, arthritis/rheumatism and heart disease emerging as key predictors of multimorbidity. Discussion: Findings indicate that social and territorial determinants are strongly associated with inequities in access to health services, continuity of care, and disease burden across quilombola communities. Conclusions: Geographic barriers and the distribution of health services are associated with distinct patterns of multimorbidity and health service access among quilombola populations. Strengthening primary care, transportation, and diagnostic support may help mitigate inequities and improve health conditions in remote Amazonian territories.

Suggested Citation

  • Leanna Silva Aquino & Ellen Mara Fernandes da Silva & Victoria Valentim Aguiar & Cesar Ferreira Fernandes Filho & Sheyla Mara Silva de Oliveira & Tatiane Costa Quaresma & Valney Mara Gomes Conde & Nád, 2026. "Geographical barriers and multimorbidity in quilombola territories of the amazon region," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344043
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344043
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344043&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0344043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.