IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338838.html

Bureaucracy, happiness, and satisfaction at work

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey Tu
  • Seth J Hill

Abstract

Despite increasing material prosperity, industrialized nations face declining self-reported happiness and increasing workplace dissatisfaction. This study investigates bureaucratic burden as a driver of diminishing job satisfaction, analyzing 7.9 million Glassdoor reviews of more than 8,000 companies from 2008-2023 using natural language processing and instrumental variables methods. We identify reviews mentioning bureaucracy and quantify their association with 1-5 star employer ratings. Mentioning bureaucracy corresponds to around 0.7-point lower ratings (a 22% decline from the mean), comparable to the impacts of mentioning low pay (–0.8) or workplace conflict (–0.9). Two-stage least squares analysis, instrumenting with future bureaucratic mentions at the same company, implies a causal relationship. These findings support theories about the harm of “illegitimate tasks” at work and suggest revisiting conventional efficiency rationales for workplace bureaucratization. Organizational practices emphasizing employee autonomy and meaningful tasks could partly mitigate declines in satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey Tu & Seth J Hill, 2026. "Bureaucracy, happiness, and satisfaction at work," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338838
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338838
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338838&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338838?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dunigan Folk & Elizabeth Dunn, 2023. "A systematic review of the strength of evidence for the most commonly recommended happiness strategies in mainstream media," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(10), pages 1697-1707, October.
    2. Yang Jie & Daniella Mokhtar & Nurul-Azza Abdullah, 2024. "The relationship between workplace bullying and family functioning: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Houdek, Petr, 2024. "Nudging in organizations: How to avoid behavioral interventions being just a façade," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Mª Dolores Merino & Marta Sánchez-Ortega & Elvira Elvira-Flores & Inmaculada Mateo-Rodríguez, 2023. "Centenary Personality: Are There Psychological Resources that Distinguish Centenarians?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 2723-2745, December.
    3. Lisa C. Walsh & Madison Montemayor-Dominguez & Calen Horton & S. Gokce Boz & Sonja Lyubomirsky, 2023. "Worker Well-Being: A Continuous Improvement Framework," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(6), pages 2993-3017, December.
    4. Maarten van Rooij & Olivier Coibion & Dimitris Georgarakos & Bernardo Candia & Yuriy Gorodnichenko, 2024. "Keeping up with the Jansens: causal peer effect on household spending, beliefs and happiness," Working Papers 804, DNB.
    5. Conner L. Deichman & Jared S. Warren, 2025. "Gratitude Training for Promoting Subjective Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Journaling to a Personalized Menu Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1-29, March.
    6. Michael A. Busseri, 2025. "Informing the Structure of Subjective Well-Being Using Preregistered Intervention Studies," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1-33, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.