IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338379.html

Evolutionary dynamics of value co-creation within the industry-university-research network: A multi-agent game perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Xuemin Zhang
  • Haijun Wang
  • Sardar M N Islam
  • Xiangfei Meng

Abstract

This paper investigates the evolutionary dynamics of value co-creation and defines the roles of multiple agents within the industry-university-research (IUR) network. A distinctive evolutionary game model from a multi-agent perspective is proposed to capture the previously under-explored dynamics of value co-creation within the IUR network. Furthermore, China’s high-end manufacturing industry was selected to establish the IUR network for simulation analysis because of its rapid transition toward innovation-driven value co-creation and the availability of granular data on IUR partnerships. The evolutionary game analysis yields three key findings with specific implications: Firstly, it reveals that the network’s average positive co-creation probability is inversely correlated with the enterprise investment difference and the academic knowledge input disparity between positive and negative value co-creation. This inverse relationship, identified by the game model, underscores the critical need for an effective supervision and management mechanism to optimize the utilization of enterprise investment and academic knowledge input during the value co-creation process within the IUR network. Secondly, the evolutionary game analysis demonstrates that specific parameters within the model – namely, the enterprise’s knowledge absorption capacity, the academic institution’s R&D capability, the government’s subsidy and penalty, and the intermediary’s transformation coefficient – play crucial roles in enhancing value co-creation probability. Based on these model-driven insights, we conclude that a combination of government guidance and market mechanisms serves as a sustainable driver for promoting value co-creation within the network. Thirdly, the model establishes an inverted U-shape relationship between the enterprise’s benefit distribution coefficient and the average positive co-creation probability. This critical finding from the evolutionary game simulation highlights the advantage of establishing an impartial interest distribution mechanism between industry and academia to foster synergy and stability in value co-creation within the IUR network.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuemin Zhang & Haijun Wang & Sardar M N Islam & Xiangfei Meng, 2025. "Evolutionary dynamics of value co-creation within the industry-university-research network: A multi-agent game perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338379
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338379
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338379&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ankrah, Samuel & AL-Tabbaa, Omar, 2015. "Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 387-408.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marius Băban & Călin Florin Băban & Tudor Mitran, 2023. "Universities as an External Knowledge Source for Industry: Investigating the Antecedents’ Impact on the Importance Perception of Their Collaboration in Open Innovation Using an Ordinal Regression-Neural Network Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Gary H. Jefferson & Renai Jiang & Lintong Li & Sam Zucker, 2017. "The role of research and ownership collaboration in generating patent quality: China-U.S comparisons," Working Papers 117, Brandeis University, Department of Economics and International Business School.
    3. E Sormani & K Uude, 2022. "Academics’ prosocial motivation for engagement with society: The case of German academics in health science [Why Do Academics Engage Locally? Insights from the University of Stavanger]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(6), pages 962-971.
    4. Puliga, Gloria & Urbinati, Andrea & Franchin, Enrico Maria & Castegnaro, Stefano, 2023. "Investigating the drivers of failure of research-industry collaborations in open innovation contexts," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Anders Melander & Tomas Mullern & David Anderssson & Fredrik Elgh & Malin Löfving, 2022. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap in Collaborative Research—in Dialogues We Trust," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 655-677, October.
    6. Chi-Yo Huang & Min-Jen Yang & Jeen-Fong Li & Hueiling Chen, 2021. "A DANP-Based NDEA-MOP Approach to Evaluating the Patent Commercialization Performance of Industry–Academic Collaborations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-26, September.
    7. Rosivalda Pereira & Mário Franco, 2023. "University-Firm Cooperation and Regional Development: Proposal of a Model of Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 676-690, June.
    8. Zarita Ahmad Baharum & Yasmin Mohd Adnan, 2025. "Strengthening Real Estate Education through Industry-Academia Collaboration: A Critical Desktop Review," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(8), pages 3384-3398, August.
    9. Aaron Kaegi & Cornelia Storz & Tobias ten Brink & Na Zou, 2025. "Web mining science–industry linkages: extending typologies and rethinking knowledge transfer," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(12), pages 6909-6948, December.
    10. Anja Ströbele & Patrick Brecht & Lisa Kurz & Carsten H. Hahn, 2023. "Conceptualization of a Cooperative Company Builder for Systematic Transfer of University Research and Innovation in the German Mittelstand," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 9(4), pages 401-428, October.
    11. Haziman Zakaria & Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi & Diyana Kamarudin & Norazah Mohd Suki & Mohd Ariff Kasim, 2025. "The Triple, Quadruple, and Quintuple Helix Models: A Bibliometric Analysis and Research Agenda," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(4), pages 15491-15539, October.
    12. Kazuki Nakajima & Kazuyuki Shudo & Naoki Masuda, 2023. "Higher-order rich-club phenomenon in collaborative research grant networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2429-2446, April.
    13. Walter Vesperi & Anna Maria Melina & Marzia Ventura & Raffaella Coppolino & Rocco Reina, 2021. "Organizing knowledge transfer between university and agribusiness firms," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 321-329, May.
    14. Emilio Bellini & Giuseppe Piroli & Luca Pennacchio, 2019. "Collaborative know-how and trust in university–industry collaborations: empirical evidence from ICT firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1939-1963, December.
    15. Jiang, Chun & Li, Shihan & Shen, Qi, 2024. "Science and technology evaluation reform and universities’ innovation performance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. Rebeka Catherine Tucker & Sarita Jane Robinson & Champika Lasanthi Liyanage, 2026. "What Makes University-Enterprise Collaborations Successful? An Integrative Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(1), pages 532-562, February.
    17. Rossi, Federica & De Silva, Muthu & Pavone, Pasquale & Rosli, Ainurul & Yip, Nick K.T., 2024. "Proximity and impact of university-industry collaborations. A topic detection analysis of impact reports," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    18. Xinran Yang & Dashuai Huang & Bingfei Liu, 2025. "University Knowledge Spillover, Intellectual Property Protection, and Innovation Performance: Evidence from Chinese High-Tech Enterprises," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    19. Mahak Bisen & Prakash Sai Lokachari, 2024. "Fostering Academia–Industry R&D Partnerships: A Study in the Indian Context Using Mixed Methods Approach," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, June.
    20. Tolulope Paul Akinbobola & Oluwole Matthew Akinnagbe, 2023. "Determinants of linkages between agricultural institutions and agro-allied industries in Southwest, Nigeria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 228-248, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.