IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338379.html

Evolutionary dynamics of value co-creation within the industry-university-research network: A multi-agent game perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Xuemin Zhang
  • Haijun Wang
  • Sardar M N Islam
  • Xiangfei Meng

Abstract

This paper investigates the evolutionary dynamics of value co-creation and defines the roles of multiple agents within the industry-university-research (IUR) network. A distinctive evolutionary game model from a multi-agent perspective is proposed to capture the previously under-explored dynamics of value co-creation within the IUR network. Furthermore, China’s high-end manufacturing industry was selected to establish the IUR network for simulation analysis because of its rapid transition toward innovation-driven value co-creation and the availability of granular data on IUR partnerships. The evolutionary game analysis yields three key findings with specific implications: Firstly, it reveals that the network’s average positive co-creation probability is inversely correlated with the enterprise investment difference and the academic knowledge input disparity between positive and negative value co-creation. This inverse relationship, identified by the game model, underscores the critical need for an effective supervision and management mechanism to optimize the utilization of enterprise investment and academic knowledge input during the value co-creation process within the IUR network. Secondly, the evolutionary game analysis demonstrates that specific parameters within the model – namely, the enterprise’s knowledge absorption capacity, the academic institution’s R&D capability, the government’s subsidy and penalty, and the intermediary’s transformation coefficient – play crucial roles in enhancing value co-creation probability. Based on these model-driven insights, we conclude that a combination of government guidance and market mechanisms serves as a sustainable driver for promoting value co-creation within the network. Thirdly, the model establishes an inverted U-shape relationship between the enterprise’s benefit distribution coefficient and the average positive co-creation probability. This critical finding from the evolutionary game simulation highlights the advantage of establishing an impartial interest distribution mechanism between industry and academia to foster synergy and stability in value co-creation within the IUR network.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuemin Zhang & Haijun Wang & Sardar M N Islam & Xiangfei Meng, 2025. "Evolutionary dynamics of value co-creation within the industry-university-research network: A multi-agent game perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338379
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338379
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338379&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ankrah, Samuel & AL-Tabbaa, Omar, 2015. "Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 387-408.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marius Băban & Călin Florin Băban & Tudor Mitran, 2023. "Universities as an External Knowledge Source for Industry: Investigating the Antecedents’ Impact on the Importance Perception of Their Collaboration in Open Innovation Using an Ordinal Regression-Neur," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Anders Melander & Tomas Mullern & David Anderssson & Fredrik Elgh & Malin Löfving, 2022. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap in Collaborative Research—in Dialogues We Trust," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 655-677, October.
    3. Chi-Yo Huang & Min-Jen Yang & Jeen-Fong Li & Hueiling Chen, 2021. "A DANP-Based NDEA-MOP Approach to Evaluating the Patent Commercialization Performance of Industry–Academic Collaborations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Anja Ströbele & Patrick Brecht & Lisa Kurz & Carsten H. Hahn, 2023. "Conceptualization of a Cooperative Company Builder for Systematic Transfer of University Research and Innovation in the German Mittelstand," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 9(4), pages 401-428, October.
    5. Emilio Bellini & Giuseppe Piroli & Luca Pennacchio, 2019. "Collaborative know-how and trust in university–industry collaborations: empirical evidence from ICT firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1939-1963, December.
    6. Ulrike Michel-Schneider, 2021. "Challenges for University - Industry Collaboration - a Stakeholder View," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 12713398, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    7. Silviya Georgieva & Maria Vasilska & Kostadin Kolarov, 2023. "The Use of University Research Products in Entrepreneurial Practice: Specifics According To Size Class of Enterprises and Sectors of Economic Activities," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 8, pages 142-163.
    8. Anna Jonsson & Maria Grafström & Mikael Klintman, 2022. "Unboxing knowledge in collaboration between academia and society: A story about conceptions and epistemic uncertainty [De-essentializing the Knowledge Intensive Firm: Reflections on Skeptical Resea," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 583-597.
    9. Jiang, Renai & Jefferson, Gary H. & Zucker, Sam & Li, Lintong, 2019. "The role of research and ownership collaboration in generating patent quality: China-U.S comparisons," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    10. Niels Stijn & Frank J. Rijnsoever & Martine Veelen, 2018. "Exploring the motives and practices of university–start-up interaction: evidence from Route 128," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 674-713, June.
    11. Adele Parmentola & Marco Ferretti & Eva Panetti, 0. "Exploring the university-industry cooperation in a low innovative region. What differences between low tech and high tech industries?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-28.
    12. Anita Mendiratta & Shveta Singh & Surendra Singh Yadav & Arvind Mahajan, 2023. "Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis of Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 319-339, September.
    13. Stilyana V. Mikova & Lilyana K. Mihova & Miroslav G. Stefanov, 2020. "Interaction Between Higher Education Institutions And Business Organisations In The Field Of Logistics And Supply Chain Management," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 14(1), pages 116-129.
    14. Natalia Budyldina, 2018. "Entrepreneurial universities and regional contribution," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 265-277, June.
    15. Massimo G. Colombo & Massimiliano Guerini & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra & Andrea Bonaccorsi, 2022. "The “first match” between high-tech entrepreneurial ventures and universities: the role of founders’ social ties," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 270-306, February.
    16. Jun-You Lin & Chih-Hai Yang, 2020. "Heterogeneity in industry–university R&D collaboration and firm innovative performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 1-25, July.
    17. Roncancio-Marin, Jason & Dentchev, Nikolay & Guerrero, Maribel & Díaz-González, Abel & Crispeels, Thomas, 2022. "University-Industry joint undertakings with high societal impact: A micro-processes approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. David Noble & Michael B. Charles & Robyn Keast, 2023. "Valuing intangible outcomes from the Cooperative Research Centres‐Projects program," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 47-62, March.
    19. Woodfield, Paul J. & Ooi, Yat Ming & Husted, Kenneth, 2023. "Commercialisation patterns of scientific knowledge in traditional low- and medium-tech industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Berné-Martínez, J.M. & Arnal-Pastor, María & Llopis-Amorós, María-Pilar, 2021. "Reacting to the paradigm shift: QCA study of the factors shaping innovation in publishing, information services, advertising and market research activities in the European Union," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.