IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0334520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing changes in the availability and readiness of health facilities to provide modern family planning services in Bangladesh: Insights from Bangladesh Health Facility Surveys, 2014 and 2017

Author

Listed:
  • Rajon Banik
  • Syed Toukir Ahmed Noor
  • Abu Bakkar Siddique
  • Md Sabbir Ahmed Mayen
  • Anindita Saha
  • Ashiquzzaman
  • Lubna Hossain
  • Abu Sayeed
  • Nondo Saha
  • Md Akib Al- Zubayer
  • Md Lutful Kader
  • Ema Akter
  • Md Abu Bakkar Siddique
  • Anisuddin Ahmed
  • Sahar Raza

Abstract

Background: Modern family planning plays a vital role in reducing unintended pregnancies, a major reproductive health issue worldwide. Access to modern family planning services is essential for empowering women to have greater control over their reproductive health and rights. In Bangladesh, there remains an unmet need for modern family planning services among reproductive-aged women. Assessing the capacity of health facilities to address these unmet needs for modern family planning is crucial. Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the changes in the availability and readiness of health facilities to provide modern family planning services in Bangladesh between 2014 and 2017, and identify factors associated with facility readiness. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from Bangladesh Health Facility Surveys (BHFS) conducted in 2014 and 2017. Availability was determined based on whether a facility offered at least one modern family planning method, and facility readiness was measured following the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) manual. Descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported, and Poisson regression models were used to identify factors associated with health facility readiness. Findings: The percentage of facilities offering modern family planning services increased significantly from approximately 81% (95% CI: 78, 85) in 2014 to 89% (95% CI: 87, 91) in 2017. The availability of oral pills, injectables, and male condoms increased over this period, while the availability of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) slightly decreased, and permanent methods (PMs) remained nearly unchanged. The overall mean readiness score of health facilities declined slightly, from about 54 (95% CI: 52, 56) in 2014 to 51 (95% CI: 50, 53) in 2017. Upazila Health Complexes and Maternal and Child Welfare Centers had significantly higher readiness compared to District Hospitals in 2017. Facilities that performed routine quality assurance activities, ensured 24-hour staff coverage, maintained a system for reviewing clients’ feedback, and provided family planning services regularly demonstrated significantly higher readiness to provide modern family planning services in both 2014 and 2017. Regional disparities were also observed; facilities in rural areas had significantly lower readiness than those in urban areas, and facilities from the Rangpur division showed significantly higher readiness compared to those in Dhaka in both survey years. Conclusion: The findings indicate a significant increase in the availability of health facilities offering modern family planning services in Bangladesh; however, a slight decline has been observed in their overall mean readiness score. Ensuring an adequate provision of equipment and supplies, expanding access to LARCs and PMs, and improving staff capacity through regular training are essential. Furthermore, strengthening quality assurance activities and investing in rural facilities are required for improving the facility readiness and advancing progress toward achieving SDG 3.7 targets of universal access to modern family planning services in Bangladesh.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajon Banik & Syed Toukir Ahmed Noor & Abu Bakkar Siddique & Md Sabbir Ahmed Mayen & Anindita Saha & Ashiquzzaman & Lubna Hossain & Abu Sayeed & Nondo Saha & Md Akib Al- Zubayer & Md Lutful Kader & Em, 2025. "Assessing changes in the availability and readiness of health facilities to provide modern family planning services in Bangladesh: Insights from Bangladesh Health Facility Surveys, 2014 and 2017," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334520
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334520
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334520&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0334520?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Virginia Wiseman & Craig Mitton & Mary M. Doyle‐Waters & Tom Drake & Lesong Conteh & Anthony T. Newall & Obinna Onwujekwe & Stephen Jan, 2016. "Using Economic Evidence to Set Healthcare Priorities in Low‐Income and Lower‐Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Methodological Frameworks," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(S1), pages 140-161, February.
    2. Virginia Wiseman & Craig Mitton & Mary M. Doyle‐Waters & Tom Drake & Lesong Conteh & Anthony T. Newall & Obinna Onwujekwe & Stephen Jan, 2016. "Using Economic Evidence to Set Healthcare Priorities in Low‐Income and Lower‐Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Methodological Frameworks," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25, pages 140-161, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahumada-Canale, Antonio & Jeet, Varinder & Bilgrami, Anam & Seil, Elizabeth & Gu, Yuanyuan & Cutler, Henry, 2023. "Barriers and facilitators to implementing priority setting and resource allocation tools in hospital decisions: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    2. Catherine Pitt & Catherine Goodman & Kara Hanson, 2016. "Economic Evaluation in Global Perspective: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Recent Literature," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(S1), pages 9-28, February.
    3. Wija Oortwijn & Gavin Surgey & Tanja Novakovic & Rob Baltussen & Lyazzat Kosherbayeva, 2022. "The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design in Kazakhstan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Mhlengi V. Ncube & Innocent T. Mutero & Moses J. Chimbari, 2020. "Unmet Needs to Treat Schistosomiasis in Children Under Five Years Old in uMkhanyakude District of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 127-127, April.
    5. Mónica D. Oliveira & Inês Mataloto & Panos Kanavos, 2019. "Multi-criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment: addressing methodological challenges to improve the state of the art," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(6), pages 891-918, August.
    6. Catherine Pitt & Anna Vassall & Yot Teerawattananon & Ulla K. Griffiths & Lorna Guinness & Damian Walker & Nicola Foster & Kara Hanson, 2016. "Foreword: Health Economic Evaluations in Low‐ and Middle‐income Countries: Methodological Issues and Challenges for Priority Setting," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(S1), pages 1-5, February.
    7. Elias Asfaw Zegeye & Josue Mbonigaba & Sylvia Blanche Kaye & Thomas Wilkinson, 2017. "Economic Evaluation in Ethiopian Healthcare Sector Decision Making: Perception, Practice and Barriers," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 33-43, February.
    8. Gerhart Knerer & Christine S M Currie & Sally C Brailsford, 2020. "The economic impact and cost-effectiveness of combined vector-control and dengue vaccination strategies in Thailand: results from a dynamic transmission model," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-32, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.