Author
Listed:
- Ghazi Al-Rawas
- Mohammad Reza Nikoo
- Mohammad Reza Hassani
- Seyyed Farid Mousavi Janbehsarayi
- Hossein Hosseinzadeh Kouhi
- Mohammad Hossein Niksokhan
Abstract
Designing sustainable Flood Control Systems (FCSs) requires considering both the resiliency of the system and the long-term viability of investments. In this regard, our research aimed at integrating concepts of hydrological resiliency and cost-benefit analysis to design the most effective flood control network. To do so, first, the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) was developed for simulating flood condition. Then, this model was coupled with the Pareto Envelope-based Selection Algorithm-II (PESA-II) to identify the optimal channels’ characteristics and generate a range of non-dominated solutions that balance implementation costs, system resilience (measured by the Simple Urban Flood Resilience Index, SUFRI), and overflow. Different flood management scenarios extracted for North Al-Batinah, Oman, a region under extreme flood events, exhibited high resilience and effectively reduced system overflow with reasonable costs. This highlights the value of optimization in resolving the conflicting objectives inherent in FCS design. Finally, net present values evaluated the long-term economic viability of each management scenario. The results revealed that strategies with moderate design costs and higher SUFRI values yielded optimal financial returns and substantial flood risk reductions. Also, the selected alternative based on net present value could reduce flood volume by 77.9%. This research underscores the critical role of incorporating resilience and cost-benefit analysis into FCS design to enhance the decision-making process.
Suggested Citation
Ghazi Al-Rawas & Mohammad Reza Nikoo & Mohammad Reza Hassani & Seyyed Farid Mousavi Janbehsarayi & Hossein Hosseinzadeh Kouhi & Mohammad Hossein Niksokhan, 2025.
"Shaping resilient flood control system design through net present value assessments,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-18, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0331225
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331225
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.