IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0321013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New perspectives on university quality assessment: A Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System approach

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Carrasco-Garrido
  • Belen Maria Moreno-Cabezali
  • Antonio Martínez Raya

Abstract

Higher education has traditionally played the role of an overarching factor in economic growth and development. The implementation of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) has already achieved improvements in many educational areas, but there remain, within the requirement to ensure academic excellence, cases where the quality criteria are not entirely harmonized. Genuine harmonization among the 48 countries that have so far been affiliated with the EHEA has been a key challenge for national educational assessment agencies and related bodies. This study aims to analyze the quality of the Spanish university system partially through a model based on the Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) methodology. Numerous studies have been identified that evaluate university quality from the perspective of the student, but there are no studies that analyze the quality of public higher education institutions from the perspective of faculty employees. This research gap prompted an extensive literature review, considering fifteen main elements classified into five categories: internationalization; scientific production, occupational category, academic background, and professional experience. Researchers collected and curated data from a database of four Madrid-based public institutions. A Mamdani FIS, yielding a unique assessment in each case, was implemented using the MATLAB Fuzzy Logic Toolbox. Therefore, the results have been evaluated to determine which institution has led to better educational quality. The research approach leads to measuring the quality of public higher education institutions. First, thanks to the quality evaluation from the perspective of the workers and the professors who are part of the four public universities in Madrid. Second, we carried out this analysis under a methodology that has not been used before on that issue. Concerning its practical implications, this study can help policymakers design better practices to improve the careers of university professors and, as a result, the quality of higher education and the future employability of graduates.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Carrasco-Garrido & Belen Maria Moreno-Cabezali & Antonio Martínez Raya, 2025. "New perspectives on university quality assessment: A Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321013
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321013
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321013&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0321013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gualberto Buela-Casal & Olga Gutiérrez-Martínez & María Paz Bermúdez-Sánchez & Oscar Vadillo-Muñoz, 2007. "Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(3), pages 349-365, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daraio, Cinzia & Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Simar, Léopold, 2015. "Rankings and university performance: A conditional multidimensional approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 918-930.
    2. Hui Xuan Tan & Ephrance Abu Ujum & Kwai Fatt Choong & Kuru Ratnavelu, 2015. "Impact analysis of domestic and international research collaborations: a Malaysian case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 885-904, January.
    3. Ghassan Abdul-Majeed & Wissam Mahmood & Nasri S. M. Namer, 2021. "Measuring research performance of Iraqi universities using Scopus data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2349-2363, March.
    4. Yang Zhang & Yu Xiao & Jun Wu & Xin Lu, 2021. "Comprehensive world university ranking based on ranking aggregation," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1139-1152, June.
    5. Prebensen, Nina K., 2017. "The mediating effect of real life encounters in co-writing tourism books," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-9.
    6. Alan Peter Matthews, 2012. "South African universities in world rankings," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(3), pages 675-695, September.
    7. Olcay, Gokcen Arkali & Bulu, Melih, 2017. "Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible?: A review of university rankings," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 153-160.
    8. Jean-Charles Billaut & Denis Bouyssou & Philippe Vincke, 2010. "Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(1), pages 237-263, July.
    9. Claudiu Vasile Kifor & Daniel Teodorescu & Tudorel Andrei & Roxana Săvescu, 2021. "Research Production and International Visibility in Higher Education: The Evolution of Romanian Universities from 2011 to 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Vicente Safón, 2013. "What do global university rankings really measure? The search for the X factor and the X entity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 223-244, November.
    11. Chia-Nan Wang & Hector Tibo & Van Thanh Nguyen & Duy Hung Duong, 2020. "Effects of the Performance-Based Research Fund and Other Factors on the Efficiency of New Zealand Universities: A Malmquist Productivity Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Lorelei R. Vinluan, 2012. "Research productivity in education and psychology in the Philippines and comparison with ASEAN countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(1), pages 277-294, April.
    13. Daniel Torres-Salinas & Jose G. Moreno-Torres & Emilio Delgado-López-Cózar & Francisco Herrera, 2011. "A methodology for Institution-Field ranking based on a bidimensional analysis: the IFQ 2 A index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(3), pages 771-786, September.
    14. Melike Çağlayan & Ece Çağlayan & Cengiz Acartürk, 2025. "Stakeholder Perspectives on Rankings of Higher Education Institutions: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(3), pages 1-38, May.
    15. Raquel Garde Sanchez & Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar & Antonio Manuel López Hernandez, 2021. "Which Are the Main Factors Influencing Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosures on Universities’ Websites," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-23, January.
    16. Esteban Fernández Tuesta & Máxima Bolaños-Pizarro & Daniel Pimentel Neves & Geziel Fernández & Justin Axel-Berg, 2020. "Complex networks for benchmarking in global universities rankings," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 405-425, October.
    17. J. A. García & Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez & J. Fdez-Valdivia & Daniel Torres-Salinas & Francisco Herrera, 2012. "Ranking of research output of universities on the basis of the multidimensional prestige of influential fields: Spanish universities as a case of study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 1081-1099, December.
    18. Themis Lazaridis, 2010. "Ranking university departments using the mean h-index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 82(2), pages 211-216, February.
    19. Karl-Heinz Leitner & Sabine Bergner & Robert Rybnicek, 2021. "The role of heads of departments in the commercialization of university research," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 353-378, April.
    20. Amir Brudner & Arieh Gavious, 2024. "A dynamic model of investment in research and teaching facilities in academic institutions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(1), pages 67-85, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.