IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0317438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A high reliability based evidential reasoning approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yin Liu
  • Hao Li

Abstract

Attribute weights exert a significant effect on the solution in multi-attribute decision analysis (MADA), since solutions produced by varying attribute weights probably vary. When a decision maker has inadequate valid data, understanding or experience to produce exact attribute weights, he/she perhaps wants to seek a solution with highest reliability, referred to in this study as a highly reliable solution. To this end, a high-reliability evidential reasoning (ER) approach is put forward in the present work, which achieves alternatives comparison through determination of their reliability relative to attribute weights under ER scenario. Initially, the best alternative supported by single or multiple sets of attribute weights was determined. Then, reliability estimation is given for every alternative. In the case of highest reliability, the optimal interval of attribute weights and evaluation grades between the optimal alternative is measured and their ranking is generated. The proposed approach to the process is based on a combination of identifying these alternatives and measuring their reliability. The problem of automobile performance evaluation is explored, finding that the proposed approach is capable of effectively generating high reliability solutions for MADA problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin Liu & Hao Li, 2025. "A high reliability based evidential reasoning approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317438
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317438
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317438&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0317438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.