IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of the reform of rural collective property rights system on villagers’ public participation: An empirical study based on CRRS 2020 data

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Li
  • Duanyang Gao

Abstract

The reform of rural collective property rights system is of great significance for protecting the collective asset rights and interests of villagers, activating rural resource elements, and achieving rural revitalization. This study is based on 284 village committee questionnaires and 7451 villager questionnaires from 10 provinces in China, and uses multi-layer linear regression models to explore the impact of the reform of rural collective property rights system on villagers’ public participation. Research has found that:(1) the reform of rural collective property rights system that has been completed at the rural level can significantly enhance the public participation of villagers, including total participation (β = 0.102, p ≤ 0.1), interest expression (β = 0.044, p ≤ 0.1), and election voting (β = 0.076, p ≤ 0.05). However, the impact on volunteer service is not significant (β = -0.004, p>0.1); (2)mechanism analysis shows that the reform can reduce the probability of migration for work, and thus enhance the level of public participation; (3)heterogeneity analysis reveals that the reform has a greater impact on the villagers’ public participation in suburban villages and villages with better collective economy; (4)further analysis discovers that villagers have heard that reform can significantly enhance their public participation. This study comprehensively explores the spillover effects of the reform at the village level on public participation at the individual level through the use of more accurate measurement indicators, empirical analysis methods, and large-scale authoritative data, providing strong support for proposing strategies to promote villages’ public participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Li & Duanyang Gao, 2025. "The impact of the reform of rural collective property rights system on villagers’ public participation: An empirical study based on CRRS 2020 data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316899
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316899
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316899&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yashuo Xue & Mei Kong & Ruiying Chen & Qingmin Wang & Yangyang Shen & Jiakun Zhuang, 2023. "How Does Internet Use Promote Returned Migrant Workers’ Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Li Huang & Minjie Zheng & Rongyu Wang, 2022. "Rural Housing Rental Rates in China: Regional Differences, Influencing Factors, and Policy Implications," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Ke Qin & Xiujuan Chen & Linhai Wu, 2022. "The effects of psychological capital on citizens’ willingness to participate in food safety social co-governance in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Xu, Haiyun & Meng, Miao & Zhu, Fangyu & Ding, Qi, 2024. "The role of local officials in promoting public participation during local urban planning processes: Evidence from Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Lulin Shen & Fang Wang, 2024. "Can Migrant Workers Returning Home for Entrepreneurship Increase Agricultural Labor Productivity: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Schwartz, Moshe & Schejter, Amit M., 2024. "Conceptualizing participation: Defining and analyzing public participation in policymaking processes," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7).
    7. Wang, Shuhong & Xing, Lu & Chen, Xueli & Song, Malin, 2024. "Evaluating and enhancing natural resource asset management efficiency in China: A data envelopment analysis study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan Sun & Yiwei Ren, 2025. "Impact of the Pilot Policy for Migrant Workers’ Return Entrepreneurship on High-Quality Agricultural Development in the Context of Rural Revitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Qinglei Zhao & Guanghui Jiang & Wenqiu Ma & Yuting Yang & Tao Zhou, 2023. "The Resource Potential and Optimization of Rural Housing Land under Utility Structure Evaluation in Metropolitan Suburbs Villages of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Yang, Senmiao & Dong, Kangyin & Wang, Jianda & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2024. "Blessings or curses? Exploring the impact of digital technology innovation on natural resource utilization efficiency in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Li Yu & Weiwei Wu, 2024. "The impact of perceived environmental corporate social responsibility on idea generation and idea implementation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Daile Zeng & Boya Chen & Jingxin Wang & John L. Innes & Juliet Lu & Futao Guo & Yancun Yan & Guangyu Wang, 2024. "Determinants of Public Participation in Watershed Management in Southeast China: An Application of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Shao, Shiping & Dong, Caisheng, 2025. "Can migrant workers return home to start businesses enhance the vitality of county economy?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela & Grebski, Wieslaw, 2025. "Post-restructuring productivity of the Polish hard coal mining industry. Does it create an opportunity for survival or a threat of closure?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    8. Zehang Xie & Wu Li & Yunxiang Xie & Lingbo Wang, 2024. "Demand and satisfaction analysis of short health videos among Chinese urban youth: A mixed-methods study based on the KANO model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Yang, Ming & Peng, HuaTao & Yue, Shunli, 2025. "How returning home for entrepreneurship affects rural common prosperity," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.