IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0314879.html

The English Debating Self-Efficacy Scale: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties

Author

Listed:
  • Fanghua Liu
  • Yanchao Yang
  • Feng (Robin) Wang
  • Wangze Li

Abstract

The importance of English debate in fostering critical thinking and the role of self-efficacy in enhancing confidence and performance in this domain are widely acknowledged. However, a significant gap exists in the literature regarding the measurement of self-efficacy specifically within English debate. This research seeks to fill this gap by developing and validating an English Debate Self-Efficacy Scale (EDSS). Using a sample of 1,259 participants from an independent college in Hebei Province, China, the study divided participants into two groups: 613 for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 646 for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), with convenience sampling as the chosen methodology. EFA revealed three core dimensions of debate-related self-efficacy: Language proficiency (Cronbach’s Alpha = .894), Debating skills (Cronbach’s Alpha = .861), and Team collaboration (Cronbach’s Alpha = .831). Subsequent CFA validation with an independent sample confirmed the scale’s structure, demonstrating strong structural, convergent, and discriminant validity. Additionally, significant correlations between the English Debate Self-Efficacy Scale and the English Proficiency Self-Efficacy Scale supported the scale’s criterion validity. These findings underscore the scale’s potential as a reliable tool for assessing self-efficacy in English debate contexts, offering valuable insights for research, teaching, and training in educational settings. Limitations related to sample representativeness and research design were also discussed, providing a foundation for future studies to expand upon. In conclusion, the English Debate Self-Efficacy Scale (EDSS) is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring self-efficacy in the context of English debate.

Suggested Citation

  • Fanghua Liu & Yanchao Yang & Feng (Robin) Wang & Wangze Li, 2025. "The English Debating Self-Efficacy Scale: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314879
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314879
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314879&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0314879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malak M Almohammadi, 2023. "A Decade of EFL Self-Efficacy Research: Empirical Status and Future Directions," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(7), pages 1-91, July.
    2. Ahmed Abdulateef Sabti & Sabariah Md Rashid & Vahid Nimehchisalem & Ramiza Darmi, 2019. "The Impact of Writing Anxiety, Writing Achievement Motivation, and Writing Self-Efficacy on Writing Performance: A Correlational Study of Iraqi Tertiary EFL Learners," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(4), pages 21582440198, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qingyang Li & Yuan Yao & Xinhua Zhu, 2024. "The association between writing motivation and performance among primary school students: considering the role of self-efficacy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Sandra Aurand Bosch & Donna Mowery Rice, 2024. "An Evaluation of the Nunez Community College Quality Enhancement Program: Assessing the Impact of Embedded Conover Workplace Readiness® Modules on Students’ Work Readiness," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    3. Qian Zhou & Hasnah Binti Mohamed, 2025. "Modeling Foreign Undergraduates’ Chinese Language Writing Mindset, Achievement Goals, and Self-regulated Learning Strategies," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    4. Leena Saad Faaik Alabbaichy & Nur Huslinda Che Mat & Nor Fazlin Mohd Ramli, 2024. "Investigating the Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Reading Comprehension among Iraqi Secondary School EFL Learners," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 5253-5267, November.
    5. Sarkawt Muhammad Qadir & Hanife Bensen Bostanci & Mustafa Kurt, 2021. "Writing Apprehension Among English as a Foreign Language Postgraduate Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    6. Ahmed Abdulateef Sabti & Aalaa Yaseen Hassan & Hutheifa Yousif Turki & Ali Salman Hummadi, 2024. "A Study of the Causes and the Effect of Writing Anxiety Components on Iraqi EFL Students’ Attitudes," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.
    7. Mohammad H. Al-khresheh & Taha O. Alkursheh, 2024. "An integrated model exploring the relationship between self-efficacy, technology integration via Blackboard, English proficiency, and Saudi EFL students’ academic achievement," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Ayman Suliman Jarrar, 2021. "The Impact of Motivation on Dynamic Capabilities in Jordanian Commercial Banks," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 130-130, January.
    9. Selamawit Getachew Wendimu & Hailay Tesfay Gebremariam, 2024. "Teacher-Students Collaboration: Using Guided-Writing Instruction to Assist Learners with Writing Difficulties and Low Motivation to Write," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    10. Hsi-Hung Peng & Astrid Tiara Murti & Lusia Maryani Silitonga & Ting-Ting Wu, 2023. "Effects of the Fundamental Concepts of Computational Thinking on Students’ Anxiety and Motivation toward K-12 English Writing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Ting Huang & Chenze Wu & Wenkang Zhang & Yao Chen, 2025. "The Effect of Production-Oriented Approach on Chinese University Students’ Foreign Language Writing Anxiety and English Writing Performance: Evidence From a Longitudinal Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
    12. Asma Almusharraf, 2026. "AI chatbots in L2 writing: anxiety, usefulness, and writing outcome," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Kadir Kaplan & İhsan Akeren & Bahadır Gülden, 2025. "The Effect of Self-Regulated Learning-Based Practices on Writing Anxiety: A Curriculum-Focused Mixed Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    14. Peiqi Zhu & Xiaohui Sun, 2025. "Investigating Writing Self-Efficacy and Writing Self-Regulated Learning Strategies Across Different Writing Proficiency Levels in Chinese English Majors: A Mixed-Methods Design," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.