IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251344016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Production-Oriented Approach on Chinese University Students’ Foreign Language Writing Anxiety and English Writing Performance: Evidence From a Longitudinal Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Huang
  • Chenze Wu
  • Wenkang Zhang
  • Yao Chen

Abstract

Many researchers have acknowledged the benefits of the production-oriented approach (POA) in teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing. However, the impacts of POA on students’ foreign language writing anxiety and English writing performance were still under-researched. Therefore, this longitudinal quasi-experimental study investigated the effect of POA on foreign language writing anxiety and English writing performance among 128 Chinese EFL university students. The experimental group was instructed through POA for 15 weeks, while the traditional product-oriented approach was used to teach the control group. Results revealed significant enhancement in the experimental group’s English writing performance after a 15-week intervention in the post-test, and the effect was retained in the delayed post-test. Significant decreases in foreign language writing anxiety were found in the experimental group after the intervention in the post-test, and the effect was retained in the delayed post-test. In contrast, no significant changes were found in the control group’s foreign language writing anxiety and English writing performance in the post-test and delayed post-test.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Huang & Chenze Wu & Wenkang Zhang & Yao Chen, 2025. "The Effect of Production-Oriented Approach on Chinese University Students’ Foreign Language Writing Anxiety and English Writing Performance: Evidence From a Longitudinal Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251344016
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251344016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251344016
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251344016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251344016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.