IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0309521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of variation in preclinical electroencephalographic (EEG) spectral power across multiple laboratories and experiments: An EQIPD study

Author

Listed:
  • Tim P Ahuis
  • Magdalena K Smyk
  • Clément Laloux
  • Katharina Aulehner
  • Jack Bray
  • Ann-Marie Waldron
  • Nina Miljanovic
  • Isabel Seiffert
  • Dekun Song
  • Bruno Boulanger
  • Mathias Jucker
  • Heidrun Potschka
  • Bettina Platt
  • Gernot Riedel
  • Patrizia Voehringer
  • Janet R Nicholson
  • Wilhelmus H I M Drinkenburg
  • Martien J H Kas
  • Steven C Leiser

Abstract

The European Quality In Preclinical Data (EQIPD) consortium was born from the fact that publications report challenges with the robustness, rigor, and/or validity of research data, which may impact decisions about whether to proceed with further preclinical testing or to advance to clinical testing, as well as draw conclusions on the predictability of preclinical models. To address this, a consortium including multiple research laboratories from academia and industry participated in a series of electroencephalography (EEG) experiments in mice aimed to detect sources of variance and to gauge how protocol harmonisation and data analytics impact such variance. Ultimately, the goal of this first ever between-laboratory comparison of EEG recordings and analyses was to validate the principles that supposedly increase data quality, robustness, and comparability. Experiments consisted of a Localisation phase, which aimed to identify the factors that influence between-laboratory variability, a Harmonisation phase to evaluate whether harmonisation of standardized protocols and centralised processing and data analysis reduced variance, and a Ring-Testing phase to verify the ability of the harmonised protocol to generate consistent findings. Indeed, between-laboratory variability reduced from Localisation to Harmonisation and this reduction remained during the Ring-Testing phase. Results obtained in this multicentre preclinical qEEG study also confirmed the complex nature of EEG experiments starting from the surgery and data collection through data pre-processing to data analysis that ultimately influenced the results and contributed to variance in findings across laboratories. Overall, harmonisation of protocols and centralized data analysis were crucial in reducing laboratory-to-laboratory variability. To this end, it is recommended that standardized guidelines be updated and followed for collection and analysis of preclinical EEG data.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim P Ahuis & Magdalena K Smyk & Clément Laloux & Katharina Aulehner & Jack Bray & Ann-Marie Waldron & Nina Miljanovic & Isabel Seiffert & Dekun Song & Bruno Boulanger & Mathias Jucker & Heidrun Potsc, 2024. "Evaluation of variation in preclinical electroencephalographic (EEG) spectral power across multiple laboratories and experiments: An EQIPD study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-35, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309521
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309521
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309521&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0309521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.