IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0309502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of phenomic selection in rice: Effects of population size and genotype-environment interactions on predictive ability

Author

Listed:
  • Hugues de Verdal
  • Vincent Segura
  • David Pot
  • Niclolas Salas
  • Vincent Garin
  • Tatiana Rakotoson
  • Louis-Marie Raboin
  • Kirsten VomBrocke
  • Julie Dusserre
  • Sergio Antonion Castro Pacheco
  • Cecile Grenier

Abstract

Phenomic prediction (PP), a novel approach utilizing Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) data, offers an alternative to genomic prediction (GP) for breeding applications. In PP, a hyperspectral relationship matrix replaces the genomic relationship matrix, potentially capturing both additive and non-additive genetic effects. While PP boasts advantages in cost and throughput compared to GP, the factors influencing its accuracy remain unclear and need to be defined. This study investigated the impact of various factors, namely the training population size, the multi-environment information integration, and the incorporations of genotype x environment (GxE) effects, on PP compared to GP. We evaluated the prediction accuracies for several agronomically important traits (days to flowering, plant height, yield, harvest index, thousand-grain weight, and grain nitrogen content) in a rice diversity panel grown in four distinct environments. Training population size and GxE effects inclusion had minimal influence on PP accuracy. The key factor impacting the accuracy of PP was the number of environments included. Using data from a single environment, GP generally outperformed PP. However, with data from multiple environments, using genotypic random effect and relationship matrix per environment, PP achieved comparable accuracies to GP. Combining PP and GP information did not significantly improve predictions compared to the best model using a single source of information (e.g., average predictive ability of GP, PP, and combined GP and PP for grain yield were of 0.44, 0.42, and 0.44, respectively). Our findings suggest that PP can be as accurate as GP when all genotypes have at least one NIRS measurement, potentially offering significant advantages for rice breeding programs, reducing the breeding cycles and lowering program costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugues de Verdal & Vincent Segura & David Pot & Niclolas Salas & Vincent Garin & Tatiana Rakotoson & Louis-Marie Raboin & Kirsten VomBrocke & Julie Dusserre & Sergio Antonion Castro Pacheco & Cecile G, 2024. "Performance of phenomic selection in rice: Effects of population size and genotype-environment interactions on predictive ability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309502
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309502
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309502&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0309502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilles Charmet & Louis-Gautier Tran & Jérôme Auzanneau & Renaud Rincent & Sophie Bouchet, 2020. "BWGS: A R package for genomic selection and its application to a wheat breeding programme," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Giovanny Covarrubias-Pazaran, 2016. "Genome-Assisted Prediction of Quantitative Traits Using the R Package sommer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reyna Persa & Martin Grondona & Diego Jarquin, 2021. "Development of a Genomic Prediction Pipeline for Maintaining Comparable Sample Sizes in Training and Testing Sets across Prediction Schemes Accounting for the Genotype-by-Environment Interaction," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Martina Hančová & Andrej Gajdoš & Jozef Hanč & Gabriela Vozáriková, 2021. "Estimating variances in time series kriging using convex optimization and empirical BLUPs," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1899-1938, August.
    3. Mathias Ruben Gemmer & Chris Richter & Yong Jiang & Thomas Schmutzer & Manish L Raorane & Björn Junker & Klaus Pillen & Andreas Maurer, 2020. "Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Guilherme Bravim Canal & Cynthia Aparecida Valiati Barreto & Francine Alves Nogueira de Almeida & Iasmine Ramos Zaidan & Diego Pereira do Couto & Camila Ferreira Azevedo & Moysés Nascimento & Marcia F, 2023. "Single and multi-trait genomic prediction for agronomic traits in Euterpe edulis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Joseph J. Hale & Takeshi Matsui & Ilan Goldstein & Martin N. Mullis & Kevin R. Roy & Christopher Ne Ville & Darach Miller & Charley Wang & Trevor Reynolds & Lars M. Steinmetz & Sasha F. Levy & Ian M. , 2024. "Genome-scale analysis of interactions between genetic perturbations and natural variation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Luciano Rogério Braatz de Andrade & Massaine Bandeira e Sousa & Eder Jorge Oliveira & Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende & Camila Ferreira Azevedo, 2019. "Cassava yield traits predicted by genomic selection methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Gaotian Zhang & Nicole M. Roberto & Daehan Lee & Steffen R. Hahnel & Erik C. Andersen, 2022. "The impact of species-wide gene expression variation on Caenorhabditis elegans complex traits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Md. S. Islam & Per McCord & Quentin D. Read & Lifang Qin & Alexander E. Lipka & Sushma Sood & James Todd & Marcus Olatoye, 2022. "Accuracy of Genomic Prediction of Yield and Sugar Traits in Saccharum spp. Hybrids," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Paolo Vitale & Giovanni Laidò & Gabriella Dono & Ivano Pecorella & Vishnu Ramasubramanian & Aaron Lorenz & Pasquale De Vita & Nicola Pecchioni, 2024. "Univariate and multivariate genomic prediction for agronomic traits in durum wheat under two field conditions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Takeshi Matsui & Martin N. Mullis & Kevin R. Roy & Joseph J. Hale & Rachel Schell & Sasha F. Levy & Ian M. Ehrenreich, 2022. "The interplay of additivity, dominance, and epistasis on fitness in a diploid yeast cross," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Liang Chen & Jindong Liu & Sang He & Liyong Cao & Guoyou Ye, 2023. "Genomic prediction of rice mesocotyl length indicative of directing seeding suitability using a half-sib hybrid population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Ibrahim ElBasyoni & Mohamed Saadalla & Stephen Baenziger & Harold Bockelman & Sabah Morsy, 2017. "Cell Membrane Stability and Association Mapping for Drought and Heat Tolerance in a Worldwide Wheat Collection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Mitchell J. Feldmann & Dominique D. A. Pincot & Glenn S. Cole & Steven J. Knapp, 2024. "Genetic gains underpinning a little-known strawberry Green Revolution," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.