IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0305989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrial prospects on regulatory gaps and barriers in pharmaceutical exports and their counteraction: Local experiential with global implication

Author

Listed:
  • Zobia Mubarak
  • Nasir Abbas
  • Furqan Khurshid Hashmi
  • Hina Shahbaz
  • Nadeem Irfan Bukhari

Abstract

Background: The pharmaceutical sector in Pakistan has grown over a period with export potential, however, there are certain barriers in the framework that regulate the growth and export of domestically manufactured pharmaceuticals. The purpose of this study was to highlight the current challenges that hinder the export of pharmaceuticals, especially to the countries with stringent regulatory authorities (SRA), as perceived by the domestic pharmaceutical industry experts, and to highlight the facilitators that may help to resolve the identified challenges. Methods: In a qualitative study, the data were collected from the consented experts from the pharmaceutical industries in Lahore, Karachi, Peshawar, and Quetta. Industrial experts with a minimum of 10 years of experience and who were serving at managerial levels or above were recruited through purposive sampling. The semi-structured interviews were conducted for the collection of data from industrial experts. Thematic content analysis was applied to conclude the data. Results: Data analysis generated 4 themes and 16 codes. The export of pharmaceuticals, despite having greater potential was regarded as poor, which was attributed to the following: (a) inadequate industrial research and development, particularly on new molecules (b) non-compliance with the cGMP standards, (c) absence of high-tech equipment, (d) unwillingness of the pharmaceutical companies for bioequivalence studies on their generics, (e) unavailability of locally manufactured active pharmaceutical ingredients, (f) disruption in the supply of imported raw material, (g) poor international market perception about local pharmaceutical products and (h) lack of support from regulatory in process expedition. The respondents also suggested the measures for overcoming the above challenges to boost the export of domestic pharmaceuticals and expand their international market share in countries with SRA. Conclusion: Export from Pakistan to the SRA countries can be enhanced with mandatory bioequivalence studies during generic registration. The pharmaceuticals export could effectively contribute to the national economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Zobia Mubarak & Nasir Abbas & Furqan Khurshid Hashmi & Hina Shahbaz & Nadeem Irfan Bukhari, 2024. "Industrial prospects on regulatory gaps and barriers in pharmaceutical exports and their counteraction: Local experiential with global implication," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305989
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305989
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305989&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0305989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriella M. Hastig & ManMohan S. Sodhi, 2020. "Blockchain for Supply Chain Traceability: Business Requirements and Critical Success Factors," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 935-954, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximilian Klöckner & Christoph G. Schmidt & Stephan M. Wagner, 2022. "When Blockchain Creates Shareholder Value: Empirical Evidence from International Firm Announcements," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 46-64, January.
    2. Wang, Chengfu & Chen, Xiangfeng & Xu, Xun & Jin, Wei, 2023. "Financing and operating strategies for blockchain technology-driven accounts receivable chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1279-1295.
    3. Jamalnia, Aboozar & Gong, Yu & Govindan, Kannan, 2023. "Sub-supplier's sustainability management in multi-tier supply chains: A systematic literature review on the contingency variables, and a conceptual framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    4. Suyuan Luo & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2022. "E‐commerce supply chains with considerations of cyber‐security: Should governments play a role?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 2107-2126, May.
    5. Yang Xia & Wenjia Zeng & Xinjie Xing & Yuanzhu Zhan & Kim Hua Tan & Ajay Kumar, 2023. "Joint optimisation of drone routing and battery wear for sustainable supply chain development: a mixed-integer programming model based on blockchain-enabled fleet sharing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 89-127, August.
    6. Tsan-Ming Choi, 2023. "Supply chain financing using blockchain: impacts on supply chains selling fashionable products," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 331(1), pages 393-415, December.
    7. Deqing Ma & Pengcheng Ma & Jinsong Hu, 2024. "The Impact of Blockchain Technology Adoption on an E-Commerce Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Consumer Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-41, February.
    8. Assunta Di Vaio & Rohail Hassan & Gabriella D’Amore & Riccardo Tiscini, 2024. "Responsible innovation and ethical corporate behavior in the Asian fashion industry: A systematic literature review and avenues ahead," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1129-1173, September.
    9. Niu, Baozhuang & Ruan, Yiyuan & Xu, Haotao, 2023. "Turn a blind eye? E-tailer's blockchain participation considering upstream competition between copycats and brands," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    10. Ma, Deqing & Hu, Jinsong, 2022. "The optimal combination between blockchain and sales format in an internet platform-based closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    11. Bin Shen & Ciwei Dong & Stefan Minner, 2022. "Combating Copycats in the Supply Chain with Permissioned Blockchain Technology," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 138-154, January.
    12. Arim Park & Huan Li, 2021. "The Effect of Blockchain Technology on Supply Chain Sustainability Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Christian Straubert & Eric Sucky, 2021. "How Useful Is a Distributed Ledger for Tracking and Tracing in Supply Chains? A Systems Thinking Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Kaustov Chakraborty & Arindam Ghosh & Saurabh Pratap, 2023. "Adoption of blockchain technology in supply chain operations: a comprehensive literature study analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1989-2007, December.
    15. Xue Wang & Deqing Ma & Jinsong Hu, 2022. "Recycling Model Selection for Electronic Products Considering Platform Power and Blockchain Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-44, May.
    16. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2020. "The Unknown Potential of Blockchain for Sustainable Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Thomas K. Dasaklis & Theodore G. Voutsinas & Giannis T. Tsoulfas & Fran Casino, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review of Blockchain-Enabled Supply Chain Traceability Implementations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-30, February.
    18. Chuangneng Cai & Xiancheng Hao & Kui Wang & Xuebing Dong, 2023. "The Impact of Perceived Benefits on Blockchain Adoption in Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, April.
    19. Subodha Kumar & Rakesh R. Mallipeddi, 2022. "Impact of cybersecurity on operations and supply chain management: Emerging trends and future research directions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4488-4500, December.
    20. Huynh, Cong Minh & Nguyen, Minh Quoc Bao, 2024. "Factors Influencing Blockchain Adoption in Logistics: A Customer-Centric Study in Vietnam," MPRA Paper 121251, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.