IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0303997.html

Factors associated with the enrollment of commercial medical insurance in China: Results from China General Social Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Songyue Xue
  • Wu Zeng
  • Xiaocong Yang
  • Jianguo Li
  • Lei Zhu
  • Guanyang Zou

Abstract

Background: The Chinese government has been promoting commercial medical insurance (CMI) in recent decades as it plays an increasingly important role in addressing disease burden, health inequities, and other healthcare challenges. However, compared with developed countries, the CMI is still less fledged with low coverage. Objective: This study aims to explore the factors associated with enrollment in CMI, with regards to explicit characteristics (including sociodemographic characteristics and family economic status), latent characteristics (including social security status), and the global incentive compatibility index (including health status), to inform the design of CMI to improve its coverage in China. Methods: Based on the principal-agent model, we summarized and classified the factors associated with the enrollment in CMI, and then analyzed the data generated from the Chinese General Social Survey in 2015,2018 and 2021 respectively. A comparison of factors regarding sociodemographic characteristics, family economic status, social security status, and health status was conducted between individuals enrolled and unenrolled in CMI using Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to explore factors influencing the enrollment status of CMI. Results: Of all individuals, the proportion of enrolled individuals shows an increasing trend year by year, with 8.7%,11.8% and 14.1% enrolled in CMI in 2015,2018 and 2021, respectively. The binary regression analysis further suggested that the factors associated with the enrollment in CMI were consistent in 2015,2018 and 2021.We found that individuals divorced, obese, who had a higher level of education, had non-agricultural household registration, perceived themselves as the upper social status, conducted daily exercise, had more family houses, had a car, had investment activities, or did not have basic health insurance were more likely to be enrolled in CMI. Conclusions: We identified multidimensional factors associated with the enrollment of CMI, which help inform the government and insurance industry to improve the coverage of CMI.

Suggested Citation

  • Songyue Xue & Wu Zeng & Xiaocong Yang & Jianguo Li & Lei Zhu & Guanyang Zou, 2024. "Factors associated with the enrollment of commercial medical insurance in China: Results from China General Social Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0303997
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0303997
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0303997&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0303997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kullberg, Linn & Blomqvist, Paula & Winblad, Ulrika, 2019. "Health insurance for the healthy? Voluntary health insurance in Sweden," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(8), pages 737-746.
    2. Light, Donald W., 2011. "Historical and comparative reflections on the U.S. national health insurance reforms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 129-132, January.
    3. K. P. M. Winssen & R. C. Kleef & W. P. M. M. Ven, 2016. "Potential determinants of deductible uptake in health insurance: How to increase uptake in The Netherlands?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(9), pages 1059-1072, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arturo Vargas Bustamante & Claudio A. Méndez, 2016. "Regulating self-selection into private health insurance in Chile and the United States," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 219-234, July.
    2. M. Antonini & R. C. van Kleef & J. Henriquez & F. Paolucci, 2023. "Can risk rating increase the ability of voluntary deductibles to reduce moral hazard?," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 48(1), pages 130-156, January.
    3. Brenna, Elenka, 2025. "Public versus private access in the Italian NHS - The use of propensity score matching to provide more insight on the increasing adoption of voluntary health insurance," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Aaltonen, Katri & Vaalavuo, Maria, 2024. "Financial burden of medicines in five Northern European countries: A decommodification perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
    5. Marenzi, Anna & Rizzi, Dino & Zanette, Michele, 2021. "Incentives for voluntary health insurance in a national health system: Evidence from Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(6), pages 685-692.
    6. Paula Blomqvist & Joakim Palme, 2020. "Universalism in Welfare Policy: The Swedish Case beyond 1990," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 114-123.
    7. Shireen Assaf & Stefano Campostrini & Cinzia Di Novi & Fang Xu & Carol Gotway Crawford, 2014. "Analyzing Disparities Trends for Health Care Insurance Coverage Among Non-Elderly Adults in the US: Evidence from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1993-2009," Working Papers 2014: 14, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    8. Paula Blomqvist & Joakim Palme, 2020. "Universalism in Welfare Policy: The Swedish Case beyond 1990," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 114-123.
    9. Kaufmann, Cornel & Schmid, Christian & Boes, Stefan, 2017. "Health insurance subsidies and deductible choice: Evidence from regional variation in subsidy schemes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 262-273.
    10. Rob J. M. Alessie & Viola Angelini & Jochen O. Mierau & Laura Viluma, 2020. "Moral hazard and selection for voluntary deductibles," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(10), pages 1251-1269, October.
    11. Rotileanu Adina & Onişor Lucian-Florin, 2021. "Private health insurance customer satisfaction. A consumer behavior exploratory study based on structural equation modeling," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Paradigm, vol. 15(1), pages 650-663, December.
    12. Doke, Theresa Enyonam Adzo, 2021. "Health Financing in Ghana: The Role of Microfinance Institutions in Reducing Health Risks," Miscellaneous Publications 358793, University of Ghana, Institute of Statistical Social & Economic Research (ISSER).
    13. Hayen, Arthur P. & Klein, Tobias J. & Salm, Martin, 2021. "Does the framing of patient cost-sharing incentives matter? the effects of deductibles vs. no-claim refunds," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    14. Shireen Assaf & Stefano Campostrini & Cinzia Di Novi & Fang Xu & Carol Gotway Crawford, 2017. "Analyzing disparity trends for health care insurance coverage among non-elderly adults in the US: evidence from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1993–2009," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(3), pages 387-398, April.
    15. Simona Laura Dragos & Codruta Mare & Cristian Mihai Dragos & Gabriela Mihaela Muresan & Alexandra-Anca Purcel, 2022. "Does voluntary health insurance improve health and longevity? Evidence from European OECD countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(8), pages 1397-1411, November.
    16. Sai Krishnan S. & Subramanian S. Iyer & Sai Balaji SMR, 2022. "Insights from behavioral economics for policymakers of choice‐based health insurance markets: A scoping review," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 115-143, June.
    17. Debora Di Gioacchino & Emanuela Ghignoni & Laura Sabani, 2026. "Healthcare Financing, Primary Care Strength, and Population Health in Europe: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Threshold Model," CIMEO Working Paper Series 200, Centre for Investigation and Modelling of Experimental Observations (CIMEO).
    18. Fey, Jan-Christian & Schmeiser, Hato & Schreiber, Florian, 2024. "Optimal insurance deductibles under limited information," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 202-221.
    19. Theresa Enyonam Adzo Doke, 2021. "Health Financing in Ghana: The Role of Microfinance Institutions in Reducing Health Risks," Miscellaneous Publications 355510, University of Ghana, Institute of Statistical Social & Economic Research (ISSER).
    20. Gabriela Mihaela Muresan & Codruta Mare & Dan Tudor Lazar & Sorin Paul Lazar, 2023. "Can Health Insurance Improve the Happiness of the Romanian People?," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(64), pages 903-903, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0303997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.