IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0298673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretable machine learning-based individual analysis of acute kidney injury in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Author

Listed:
  • Minoru Sakuragi
  • Eiichiro Uchino
  • Noriaki Sato
  • Takeshi Matsubara
  • Akihiko Ueda
  • Yohei Mineharu
  • Ryosuke Kojima
  • Motoko Yanagita
  • Yasushi Okuno

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Since the etiology of AKI in patients undergoing cancer therapy varies, clarifying underlying causes in individual cases is critical for optimal cancer treatment. Although it is essential to individually analyze immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients for underlying pathologies for each AKI episode, these analyses have not been realized. Herein, we aimed to individually clarify the underlying causes of AKI in immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients using a new clustering approach with Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Methods: We developed a gradient-boosting decision tree-based machine learning model continuously predicting AKI within 7 days, using the medical records of 616 immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients. The temporal changes in individual predictive reasoning in AKI prediction models represented the key features contributing to each AKI prediction and clustered AKI patients based on the features with high predictive contribution quantified in time series by SHAP. We searched for common clinical backgrounds of AKI patients in each cluster, compared with annotation by three nephrologists. Results: One hundred and twelve patients (18.2%) had at least one AKI episode. They were clustered per the key feature, and their SHAP value patterns, and the nephrologists assessed the clusters’ clinical relevance. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the area under the curve was 0.880. Patients with AKI were categorized into four clusters with significant prognostic differences (p = 0.010). The leading causes of AKI for each cluster, such as hypovolemia, drug-related, and cancer cachexia, were all clinically interpretable, which conventional approaches cannot obtain. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the clustering method of individual predictive reasoning in machine learning models can be applied to infer clinically critical factors for developing each episode of AKI among patients with multiple AKI risk factors, such as immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Minoru Sakuragi & Eiichiro Uchino & Noriaki Sato & Takeshi Matsubara & Akihiko Ueda & Yohei Mineharu & Ryosuke Kojima & Motoko Yanagita & Yasushi Okuno, 2024. "Interpretable machine learning-based individual analysis of acute kidney injury in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0298673
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298673
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298673&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0298673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Meyer Lauritsen & Mads Kristensen & Mathias Vassard Olsen & Morten Skaarup Larsen & Katrine Meyer Lauritsen & Marianne Johansson Jørgensen & Jeppe Lange & Bo Thiesson, 2020. "Explainable artificial intelligence model to predict acute critical illness from electronic health records," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nohyeong Jeong & Shinyun Park & Subhamoy Mahajan & Ji Zhou & Jens Blotevogel & Ying Li & Tiezheng Tong & Yongsheng Chen, 2024. "Elucidating governing factors of PFAS removal by polyamide membranes using machine learning and molecular simulations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Wasif Khan & Nazar Zaki & Nadirah Ghenimi & Amir Ahmad & Jiang Bian & Mohammad M Masud & Nasloon Ali & Romona Govender & Luai A Ahmed, 2023. "Predicting preterm birth using explainable machine learning in a prospective cohort of nulliparous and multiparous pregnant women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Gabriel Ferrettini & Elodie Escriva & Julien Aligon & Jean-Baptiste Excoffier & Chantal Soulé-Dupuy, 2022. "Coalitional Strategies for Efficient Individual Prediction Explanation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 49-75, February.
    4. Haque, AKM Bahalul & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mikalef, Patrick, 2023. "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) from a user perspective: A synthesis of prior literature and problematizing avenues for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    5. Mohammad Ordikhani & Mohammad Saniee Abadeh & Christof Prugger & Razieh Hassannejad & Noushin Mohammadifard & Nizal Sarrafzadegan, 2022. "An evolutionary machine learning algorithm for cardiovascular disease risk prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Wang, Fujin & Zhao, Zhibin & Zhai, Zhi & Shang, Zuogang & Yan, Ruqiang & Chen, Xuefeng, 2023. "Explainability-driven model improvement for SOH estimation of lithium-ion battery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0298673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.