IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0293602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mixed method evaluation of a theory based intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in contact centres- the stand up for health stepped wedge feasibility study

Author

Listed:
  • Divya Sivaramakrishnan
  • Graham Baker
  • Richard A Parker
  • Jillian Manner
  • Scott Lloyd
  • Ruth Jepson

Abstract

Introduction: Contact centres have higher levels of sedentary behaviour than other office-based workplaces. Stand Up for Health (SUH) is a theory-based intervention developed using the 6SQuID framework to reduce sedentary behaviour in contact centre workers. The aim of this study was to test acceptability and feasibility of implementing SUH in UK contact centres. Methods: The study was conducted in 2020–2022 (pre COVID and during lockdown) and used a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial design including a process evaluation. The intervention included working with contact centre managers to develop and implement a customised action plan aligning with SUH’s theory of change. Workplace sedentary time, measured using activPAL™ devices, was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included productivity, mental wellbeing, musculoskeletal health and physical activity. Empirical estimates of between-centre standard deviation and within-centre standard deviation of outcomes from pre-lockdown data were calculated to inform sample size calculations for future trials. The process evaluation adopted the RE-AIM framework to understand acceptability and feasibility of implementing the intervention. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with contact centre employees and managers, and activity preferences were collected using a questionnaire. Results: A total of 11 contact centres participated: 155 employees from 6 centres in the pre-lockdown data collection, and 54 employees from 5 centres post-lockdown. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with 33 employees and managers, and 96 participants completed an intervention activity preference questionnaire. Overall, the intervention was perceived as acceptable and feasible to deliver. Most centres implemented several intervention activities aligned with SUH’s theory of change and over 50% of staff participated in at least one activity (pre-lockdown period). Perceived benefits including reduced sedentary behaviour, increased physical activity, and improved staff morale and mood were reported by contact centre employees and managers. Conclusions: SUH demonstrates potential as an appealing and acceptable intervention, impacting several wellbeing outcomes. Trial registration: The trial has been registered on the ISRCTNdatabase: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11580369.

Suggested Citation

  • Divya Sivaramakrishnan & Graham Baker & Richard A Parker & Jillian Manner & Scott Lloyd & Ruth Jepson, 2023. "A mixed method evaluation of a theory based intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in contact centres- the stand up for health stepped wedge feasibility study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-32, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0293602
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0293602
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0293602&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0293602?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glasgow, R.E. & Vogt, T.M. & Boles, S.M., 1999. "Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(9), pages 1322-1327.
    2. Tirman, Laura & Biggs, Hannah & Morrison, Kathleen & Manner, Jillian & Sivaramakrishnan, Divya & Baker, Graham & Jepson, Ruth, 2021. "Stand Up for Health: Programme theory for an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in contact centres," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Josephine Y Chau & Anne C Grunseit & Tien Chey & Emmanuel Stamatakis & Wendy J Brown & Charles E Matthews & Adrian E Bauman & Hidde P van der Ploeg, 2013. "Daily Sitting Time and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-1, November.
    4. Marie-Anne Durand & Lewis Carpenter & Hayley Dolan & Paulina Bravo & Mala Mann & Frances Bunn & Glyn Elwyn, 2014. "Do Interventions Designed to Support Shared Decision-Making Reduce Health Inequalities? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, April.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0150205 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chelsea M. Cooper & Mary Drake & Justine A. Kavle & Joyce Nyoni & Ruth Lemwayi & Lemmy Mabuga & Anne Pfitzer & Mary Makungu & Elizabeth Massawe & John George, 2021. "Implementing a Novel Facility-Community Intervention for Strengthening Integration of Infant Nutrition and Family Planning in Mara and Kagera, Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Francisco Javier de la Garza Iga & Marinés Mejía Alvarez & Joshua D Cockroft & Julia Rabin & Ana Cordón & Dina Maria Elias Rodas & Maria del Pilar Grazioso & Maria Espinola & Christine O’Dea & Ch, 2023. "Using the project ECHO™ model to teach mental health topics in rural Guatemala: An implementation science-guided evaluation," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(8), pages 2031-2041, December.
    3. Sebastian-Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard-Gabriel Ceptureanu & Mihai Cristian Orzan & Irinel Marin, 2017. "Toward a Romanian NPOs Sustainability Model: Determinants of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Michelle Nichols & Ronald Teufel & Sarah Miller & Mohan Madisetti & Christine San Giovanni & Katherine Chike-Harris & Lacy Jones & Margaret Prentice & Kenneth Ruggiero & Teresa Kelechi, 2020. "Managing Asthma and Obesity Related Symptoms (MATADORS): An mHealth Intervention to Facilitate Symptom Self-Management among Youth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Floor A. van den Brand & Tessa Magnée & Lotte de Haan-Bouma & Cas Barendregt & Niels H. Chavannes & Onno C. P. van Schayck & Gera E. Nagelhout, 2019. "Implementation of Financial Incentives for Successful Smoking Cessation in Real-Life Company Settings: A Qualitative Needs Assessment among Employers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Currie, Melissa & King, Gillian & Rosenbaum, Peter & Law, Mary & Kertoy, Marilyn & Specht, Jacqueline, 2005. "A model of impacts of research partnerships in health and social services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 400-412, November.
    7. Guzmán, Azucena & Orellana, Katharine & Ortega, Mariana López & Robledo, Luis Miguel Gutiérrez & Castro, Sara Torres, 2024. "Introducing a multicomponent staff training intervention to reduce antipsychotic medication: Care home management pre and post intervention views of systemic impact, and preliminary RE-AIM evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Junrui Di & Adam Spira & Jiawei Bai & Jacek Urbanek & Andrew Leroux & Mark Wu & Susan Resnick & Eleanor Simonsick & Luigi Ferrucci & Jennifer Schrack & Vadim Zipunnikov, 2019. "Joint and Individual Representation of Domains of Physical Activity, Sleep, and Circadian Rhythmicity," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(2), pages 371-402, July.
    9. Petra Boersma & Julia C M van Weert & Berno van Meijel & Rose‐Marie Dröes, 2017. "Implementation of the Veder contact method in daily nursing home care for people with dementia: a process analysis according to the RE‐AIM framework," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 436-455, February.
    10. Marsha L. Brierley & Lindsey R. Smith & Angel M. Chater & Daniel P. Bailey, 2022. "A-REST (Activity to Reduce Excessive Sitting Time): A Feasibility Trial to Reduce Prolonged Sitting in Police Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, July.
    11. Fanni Rencz & Béla Tamási & Valentin Brodszky & László Gulácsi & Miklós Weszl & Márta Péntek, 2019. "Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(1), pages 43-55, June.
    12. Katrien De Cocker & Greet Cardon & Jason A. Bennie & Tracy Kolbe-Alexander & Femke De Meester & Corneel Vandelanotte, 2018. "From Evidence-Based Research to Practice-Based Evidence: Disseminating a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Workplace Sitting Intervention through a Health Promotion Organisation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, May.
    13. Janet M. Boekhout & Brenda A. J. Berendsen & Denise A. Peels & Catherine A. W. Bolman & Lilian Lechner, 2018. "Evaluation of a Computer-Tailored Healthy Ageing Intervention to Promote Physical Activity among Single Older Adults with a Chronic Disease," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Vanessa Bertuzzi & Michelle Semonella & Gianluca Castelnuovo & Gerhard Andersson & Giada Pietrabissa, 2022. "Synthesizing Stakeholders Perspectives on Online Psychological Interventions to Improve the Mental Health of the Italian Population during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Online Survey Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    15. repec:plo:pone00:0186538 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Harriet Koorts & Adrian Bauman & Nancy Edwards & William Bellew & Wendy J. Brown & Mitch J. Duncan & David R. Lubans & Andrew J. Milat & Philip J. Morgan & Nicole Nathan & Andrew Searles & Karen Lee &, 2022. "Tensions and Paradoxes of Scaling Up: A Critical Reflection on Physical Activity Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Manou Anselma & Mai Chinapaw & Teatske Altenburg, 2020. "“Not Only Adults Can Make Good Decisions, We as Children Can Do That as Well” Evaluating the Process of the Youth-Led Participatory Action Research ‘Kids in Action’," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-24, January.
    18. Lynn Kennedy & Susan Pinkney & Selina Suleman & Louise C. Mâsse & Patti-Jean Naylor & Shazhan Amed, 2019. "Propagating Change: Using RE-FRAME to Scale and Sustain A Community-Based Childhood Obesity Prevention Initiative," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Krisdaniel Berreta & Cynthia Nguyen & Alexis M. Stoner & Lindsey Ridgeway & Angela Wilson & Natalie Fadel & Duke Biber, 2023. "A RE-AIM Analysis of a Mental Health App for Undergraduate and Medical Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-9, June.
    20. Hutto, Brent & Saunders, Ruth P. & Wilcox, Sara & Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E. & Bernhart, John A. & Dunn, Caroline G. & Kaczynski, Andrew T. & James, Katherine L., 2021. "Pathways of influences leading to adoption of the Faith, Activity and Nutrition (FAN) program in a statewide initiative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    21. Ward, Stéphanie & Chow, Amanda Froehlich & Humbert, M. Louise & Bélanger, Mathieu & Muhajarine, Nazeem & Vatanparast, Hassan & Leis, Anne, 2018. "Promoting physical activity, healthy eating and gross motor skills development among preschoolers attending childcare centers: Process evaluation of the Healthy Start-Départ Santé intervention using t," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 90-98.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0293602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.