IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0287338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to hepatocellular carcinoma care in North Carolina

Author

Listed:
  • Emily M Ray
  • Randall W Teal
  • Jessica Carda-Auten
  • Erin Coffman
  • Hanna K Sanoff

Abstract

Background: Many patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) never receive cancer-directed therapy. In order to tailor interventions to increase access to appropriate therapy, we sought to understand the barriers and facilitators to HCC care. Methods: Patients with recently diagnosed HCC were identified through the University of North Carolina (UNC) HCC clinic or local hospital cancer registrars (rapid case ascertainment, RCA). Two qualitative researchers conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and coded. Results: Nineteen interviews were conducted (10 UNC, 9 RCA). Key facilitators of care were: physician knowledge; effective communication regarding test results, plan of care, and prognosis; social support; and financial support. Barriers included: lack of transportation; cost of care; provider lack of knowledge about HCC; delays in scheduling; or poor communication with the medical team. Participants suggested better coordination of appointments and having a primary contact within the healthcare team. Limitations: We primarily captured the perspectives of those HCC patients who, despite the challenges they describe, were ultimately able to receive HCC care. Conclusions: This study identifies key facilitators and barriers to accessing care for HCC in North Carolina. Use of the RCA system to identify patients from a variety of settings, treated and untreated, enabled us to capture a broad range of perspectives. Reducing barriers through improving communication and care coordination, assisting with out-of-pocket costs, and engaging caregivers and other medical providers may improve access. This study should serve as the basis for tailored interventions aimed at improving access to appropriate, life-prolonging care for patients with HCC.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily M Ray & Randall W Teal & Jessica Carda-Auten & Erin Coffman & Hanna K Sanoff, 2023. "Qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to hepatocellular carcinoma care in North Carolina," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0287338
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287338
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287338&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0287338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank J van Rijnsoever, 2017. "(I Can’t Get No) Saturation: A simulation and guidelines for sample sizes in qualitative research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatoumata Fofana & Pat Bazeley & Antoine Regnault, 2020. "Applying a mixed methods design to test saturation for qualitative data in health outcomes research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Mary Ryder & Elisabeth Jacob & Joyce Hendricks, 2019. "An inductive qualitative approach to explore Nurse Practitioners views on leadership and research: An international perspective," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2644-2658, July.
    3. Hennink, Monique & Kaiser, Bonnie N., 2022. "Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    4. Velasco-Herrejón, Paola & Bauwens, Thomas & Calisto Friant, Martin, 2022. "Challenging dominant sustainability worldviews on the energy transition: Lessons from Indigenous communities in Mexico and a plea for pluriversal technologies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    5. Evans Martin Nakhokho & Florence Kyazze Birungi & Lucy Ann Mulugo, 2025. "The Role of the Product-Process Matrix in the Consumption of Agricultural Finance by Smallholder Farmers: The Case of Centenary Bank in Uganda," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(3), pages 1-45, February.
    6. Nassim Ghondaghsaz & Zarina Chokparova & Sven Engesser & Leon Urbas, 2022. "Managing the Tension between Trust and Confidentiality in Mobile Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Jessica Eise & Natalie J. Lambert & Eric C. Wiemer, 2021. "Leveraging communities’ network strengths to support climate change adaptation information-sharing: a study with coffee farmers in Risaralda, Colombia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 1-19, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0287338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.