IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0285330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond market share: Accounting for doctoral program size in recent rates of anthropology faculty job placement

Author

Listed:
  • Madeline E Mackie
  • Heather Rockwell

Abstract

Job placement trends in higher education at US institutions are bleak. Within anthropology and other social science disciplines this problem appears to be particularly pronounced. Recent studies focusing on placement in Anthropology using market share analysis have suggested that specific doctoral programs offer a greater chance of placing their graduates in faculty positions. Here we expand on that work, looking beyond market share to the number of graduates placed in positions relative to the total number of program graduates. Our results suggest that while large programs do indeed command the majority of tenure track placements by market share, much of this may be a product of the high numbers of graduates from these programs. Smaller programs can be proportionally as successful at placing their students in tenure track positions. The majority of PhDs in anthropology should anticipate gaining employment outside of a tenure track position. Training students for positions in private industry, government, and other non-faculty opportunities is essential.

Suggested Citation

  • Madeline E Mackie & Heather Rockwell, 2023. "Beyond market share: Accounting for doctoral program size in recent rates of anthropology faculty job placement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0285330
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0285330
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0285330&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0285330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Hunter Wapman & Sam Zhang & Aaron Clauset & Daniel B. Larremore, 2022. "Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention," Nature, Nature, vol. 610(7930), pages 120-127, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fengyuan Liu & Petter Holme & Matteo Chiesa & Bedoor AlShebli & Talal Rahwan, 2023. "Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(3), pages 353-364, March.
    2. Jappe, Arlette, 2023. "Mergers between universities and governmental research organizations in the Netherlands and Denmark. Institutional platforms for agricultural transformations," SocArXiv 35kfa, Center for Open Science.
    3. Trang Pham & Yung-Yu Tsai, 2024. "The Roles of Faculty Hiring and Retention in Shaping Diversity and Representation in US Higher Education Institutions: A Retrospective and Prospective Analysis from 2001 to 2035," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 65(7), pages 1420-1460, November.
    4. Byrne, Eamon & MacKenzie, Tim MG & goswami, aranyak & Suresh, Samyuktha & Ahmad, M. Usman, 2023. "SURPAS Long Range Planning Report 2023," OSF Preprints t5mwn, Center for Open Science.
    5. Diego Kozlowski & Thema Monroe‐White & Vincent Larivière & Cassidy R. Sugimoto, 2024. "The Howard‐Harvard effect: Institutional reproduction of intersectional inequalities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(8), pages 869-882, August.
    6. Seth D Bush & Michael T Stevens & Kimberly D Tanner & Kathy S Williams, 2024. "Differentiation, adaptation, and perseverance: Maturing conceptualizations of education-focused science faculty in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Bosworth, Steven J. & Della Giusta, Marina, 2024. "When Matthew Met Larry: Explaining the Persistence of Gender Underrepresentation in High Status Organizations," IZA Discussion Papers 17460, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. John P. Nelson & Barry Bozeman & Stuart Bretschneider & Spencer L. Lindsay, 2024. "How do academic public administration and public policy researchers affect policymaking? Functional groupings from survey data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(1), pages 65-93, January.
    9. Katchanov, Yurij L. & Markova, Yulia V. & Shmatko, Natalia A., 2023. "Empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in scientific research careers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    10. Rossello, Giulia & Martinelli, Arianna, 2023. "Breach of academic values and digital deviant behaviour: The case of Sci-Hub," MERIT Working Papers 2023-009, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    11. Filippo Dal Fiore, 2025. "Can We Reinvent the Modern University? A Vision for a Complementary Academic System, with a Life-Affirming and Spiritually Conscious Orientation," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    12. repec:osf:osfxxx:t5mwn_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Guido Buenstorf & Johannes Koenig & Anne Otto, 2025. "Keeping up with the Max Plancks? Germany’s quest for university excellence and the role of public research institutes in doctoral education," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(1), pages 67-108, January.
    14. repec:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2024:i:2:p:256-272. is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Cody FitzGerald & Yitong Huang & Katelyn Plaisier Leisman & Chad M. Topaz, 2023. "Temporal dynamics of faculty hiring in mathematics," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0285330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.