IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0282887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-pharmacological interventions on anxiety and depression in lung cancer patients’ informal caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Lei
  • Eunice Lee
  • Joosun Shin
  • Shin-Young Lee

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is one of the common cancers and the leading cause of death. Tremendous caregiving burden of informal caregivers of lung cancer causes psychological disorders, such as anxiety and depression. Interventions for informal caregivers of patients with lung cancer to improve their psychological health, which ultimately leads to patients’ positive health outcomes, are crucial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to: 1) evaluate the effect of non-pharmacological interventions on the outcomes of depression and anxiety for lung cancer patients’ informal caregivers; and 2) compare the effects of interventions with differing characteristics (i.e. intervention types, mode of contact, and group versus individual delivery). Methods: Four databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria for the articles were peer-reviewed non-pharmacological intervention studies on depression and anxiety in lung cancer patients’ informal caregivers published between January 2010 and April 2022. Systematic review procedures were followed. Data analysis of related studies was conducted using the Review Manager Version 5.4 software. Intervention effect sizes and studies’ heterogeneity were calculated. Results: Eight studies from our search were eligible for inclusion. Regarding total effect for the caregivers’ levels of anxiety and depression, results revealed evidence for significant moderate effects of intervention on anxiety (SMD -0.44; 95% CI, -0.67, -0.21; p = 0.0002) and depression (SMD -0.46; 95% CI, -0.74, -0.18; p = 0.001). Subgroup analyses for both anxiety and depression of informal caregivers revealed moderate to high significant effects for specific intervention types (cognitive behavioral and mindfulness combined with psycho-education interventions), mode of contact (telephone-based interventions), and group versus individual delivery. Conclusion: This review provides evidence that cognitive behavioral and mindfulness-based, telephone-based, individual or group-based interventions were effective for informal caregivers of lung cancer patients. Further research is needed to develop the most effective intervention contents and delivery methods across informal caregivers with larger sample size in randomized controlled trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Lei & Eunice Lee & Joosun Shin & Shin-Young Lee, 2023. "Non-pharmacological interventions on anxiety and depression in lung cancer patients’ informal caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282887
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282887
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282887&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0282887?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey C. Valentine & Therese D. Pigott & Hannah R. Rothstein, 2010. "How Many Studies Do You Need?," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(2), pages 215-247, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Habarurema Jean Baptiste & Yan Guang Cai & A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam & Nzabalirwa Wenceslas, 2022. "A Systematic Review of University Social Responsibility in Post-Conflict Societies: The Case of the Great Lakes Region of East Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 439-475, November.
    2. Yunjeong Yi & Eunju Seo & Jiyeon An, 2022. "Does Forest Therapy Have Physio-Psychological Benefits? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Chuang Yuan & Jing Wang & Michael Ying, 2016. "Predictive Value of Carotid Distensibility Coefficient for Cardiovascular Diseases and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Valérie Benoit & Piera Gabola, 2021. "Effects of Positive Psychology Interventions on the Well-Being of Young Children: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Christin Höge-Junge & Stefan Eckert, 2024. "Multinationality and systematic risk: a literature review and meta-analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 377-414, February.
    6. Oesterreich, Thuy Duong & Anton, Eduard & Teuteberg, Frank & Dwivedi, Yogesh K, 2022. "The role of the social and technical factors in creating business value from big data analytics: A meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 128-149.
    7. Mikkel Helding Vembye & James Eric Pustejovsky & Therese Deocampo Pigott, 2023. "Power Approximations for Overall Average Effects in Meta-Analysis With Dependent Effect Sizes," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(1), pages 70-102, February.
    8. Sarah Fischer & Shannon Hyder & Arlene Walker, 2020. "The effect of employee affective and cognitive trust in leadership on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitment: Meta-analytic findings and implications for trust research," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(4), pages 662-679, November.
    9. Olesya Falenchuk & Michal Perlman & Evelyn McMullen & Brooke Fletcher & Prakesh S Shah, 2017. "Education of staff in preschool aged classrooms in child care centers and child outcomes: A meta-analysis and systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-33, August.
    10. Markus Hang & Jerome Geyer‐Klingeberg & Andreas Rathgeber & Stefan Stöckl, 2018. "Economic Development Matters: A Meta‐Regression Analysis on the Relation between Environmental Management and Financial Performance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(4), pages 720-744, August.
    11. Sonia Nath & Sneha Sethi & João L. Bastos & Helena M. Constante & Kostas Kapellas & Dandara Haag & Lisa M. Jamieson, 2022. "A Global Perspective of Racial–Ethnic Inequities in Dental Caries: Protocol of Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Falonn Contreras-Osorio & Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo & Enrique Cerda-Vega & Rodrigo Campos-Jara & Cristian Martínez-Salazar & Rodrigo Araneda & Daniela Ebner-Karestinos & Cristián Arellano-Roco & Christ, 2022. "Effects of Sport-Based Exercise Interventions on Executive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Pablo Valdés-Badilla & Tomás Herrera-Valenzuela & Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo & Esteban Aedo-Muñoz & Eduardo Báez-San Martín & Alex Ojeda-Aravena & Braulio Henrique Magnani Branco, 2021. "Effects of Olympic Combat Sports on Older Adults’ Health Status: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Affognon, Hippolyte & Mutungi, Christopher & Sanginga, Pascal & Borgemeister, Christian, 2015. "Unpacking Postharvest Losses in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Meta-Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 49-68.
    15. Mesfin Abebe & Yordanos Sisay Asgedom & Amanuel Yosef Gebrekidan & Tsion Mulat Tebeje, 2025. "Antenatal depression among pregnant women in Ethiopia: An umbrella review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Yusi Gong & Taylor P Trentadue & Swastina Shrestha & Elena Losina & Jamie E Collins, 2018. "Financial incentives for objectively-measured physical activity or weight loss in adults with chronic health conditions: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Mohammad Reza Anani Sarab & Mohammad Amini Farsani, 2024. "Second-order synthesis of meta-analytic studies in applied linguistics (1998–2021)," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1517-1543, April.
    18. Chuka Emezue & Tina L. Bloom, 2021. "PROTOCOL: Technology‐based and digital interventions for intimate partner violence: A meta‐analysis and systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), March.
    19. Nahia Idoiaga Mondragon & Idoia Legorburu Fernandez & Naiara Ozamiz-Etxebarria & Beatriz Villagrasa & Javier Santabárbara, 2023. "PTSD (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder) in Teachers: A Mini Meta-Analysis during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    20. Shuzhen Ma & Kim Geok Soh & Salimah Binti Japar & Chunqing Liu & Shengyao Luo & Yiqiang Mai & Xinzhi Wang & Mengze Zhai, 2024. "Effect of core strength training on the badminton player’s performance: A systematic review & meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-22, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.