IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0279444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk of violence from a current or former partner: Associated factors and classification in a nationwide study in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Isaac Esteban Camargo Freile
  • Karen Cecilia Flórez Lozano
  • Carlos Alberto Sarmiento Crespo
  • Carolina Mercedes Vecchio Camargo
  • Sandra Milena Rodríguez Acosta
  • Victor Florez-Garcia
  • Edgar Navarro Lechuga

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) includes assaults that risk a woman’s bodily integrity. Intimate partners commit IPV, people with whom the victim shares (or shared) a close personal or sexual relationship. This phenomenon has a great global and national impact. Thus, it is necessary to establish trends of the risk of physical violence to women by their current or former partner in each department of Colombia and its relationship with sociodemographic and health characteristics. This study uses an ecological approach at the departmental level, with victims of intimate partner violence treated at the National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences (INMLyCF). Potential factors were identified through Bayesian factor analysis and were included in the model to estimate risk. The findings show that the Casanare department had the highest risk of producing victims (SMR: 2.545). In departments where the educational level of women is at or below primary school, there is a high-risk β = 0.343 (0.285, 0.397) of them being assaulted. For the departments in which the employment of women is in sales and services or office workers, the associated factor presents a higher risk β = 0.361 (0.201, 0.485), as in the risk related to affiliation with the social security system β = 0.338 (0.246, 0.498), as well as sexual and reproductive life β = 0.143 (0.003, 0.322). The following categories were associated with physical gender violence: no education and low participation in making purchases at home β = 0.106 (0.049, 0.199), low participation in decisions about their health, and visits to family and friends β = 0.240 (0.170, 0.299). Therefore, public health programs should strengthen women’s empowerment in household decisions and increase their educational level to reduce this incidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Isaac Esteban Camargo Freile & Karen Cecilia Flórez Lozano & Carlos Alberto Sarmiento Crespo & Carolina Mercedes Vecchio Camargo & Sandra Milena Rodríguez Acosta & Victor Florez-Garcia & Edgar Navarro, 2022. "Risk of violence from a current or former partner: Associated factors and classification in a nationwide study in Colombia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0279444
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279444
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279444&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0279444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Conti, Gabriella & Frühwirth-Schnatter, Sylvia & Heckman, James J. & Piatek, Rémi, 2014. "Bayesian exploratory factor analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 31-57.
    2. Enrique Gracia & Antonio López-Quílez & Miriam Marco & Marisol Lila, 2018. "Neighborhood characteristics and violence behind closed doors: The spatial overlap of child maltreatment and intimate partner violence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lidia Puigvert & Ana Vidu & Patricia Melgar & Marifa Salceda, 2021. "BraveNet Upstander Social Network against Second Order of Sexual Harassment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Gregor Kastner & Sylvia Fruhwirth-Schnatter & Hedibert Freitas Lopes, 2016. "Efficient Bayesian Inference for Multivariate Factor Stochastic Volatility Models," Papers 1602.08154, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2017.
    3. Sylvia Fruhwirth-Schnatter, 2023. "Generalized Cumulative Shrinkage Process Priors with Applications to Sparse Bayesian Factor Analysis," Papers 2303.00473, arXiv.org.
    4. Papastamoulis, Panagiotis, 2018. "Overfitting Bayesian mixtures of factor analyzers with an unknown number of components," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 220-234.
    5. Xianhua Dai & Wolfgang Karl Härdle & Keming Yu, 2016. "Do maternal health problems influence child's worrying status? Evidence from the British Cohort Study," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(16), pages 2941-2955, December.
    6. Luca Marcolin & Mariagrazia Squicciarini, 2018. "Investing in Innovation and Skills: Thriving through Global Value Chains," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 9(1).
    7. Attanasio, Orazio & Blundell, Richard & Conti, Gabriella & Mason, Giacomo, 2020. "Inequality in socio-emotional skills: A cross-cohort comparison," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Adrian Quintero & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Geert Verbeke, 2024. "Bayesian Exploratory Factor Analysis via Gibbs Sampling," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(1), pages 121-142, February.
    9. Simon Beyeler & Sylvia Kaufmann, 2021. "Reduced‐form factor augmented VAR—Exploiting sparsity to include meaningful factors," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(7), pages 989-1012, November.
    10. Gabriella Conti, 2013. "The Developmental Origins of Health Inequality," Research on Economic Inequality, in: Health and Inequality, volume 21, pages 285-309, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    11. Gregory Camilli & Jean-Paul Fox, 2015. "An Aggregate IRT Procedure for Exploratory Factor Analysis," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 40(4), pages 377-401, August.
    12. Wagner, Helga & Frühwirth-Schnatter, Sylvia & Jacobi, Liana, 2023. "Factor-augmented Bayesian treatment effects models for panel outcomes," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 63-80.
    13. Conti, Gabriella & Heckman, James J., 2012. "The Economics of Child Well-Being," IZA Discussion Papers 6930, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Simon Beyeler & Sylvia Kaufmann, 2016. "Factor augmented VAR revisited - A sparse dynamic factor model approach," Working Papers 16.08, Swiss National Bank, Study Center Gerzensee.
    15. Aßmann, Christian & Boysen-Hogrefe, Jens & Pape, Markus, 2016. "Bayesian analysis of static and dynamic factor models: An ex-post approach towards the rotation problem," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 190-206.
    16. Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter & Darjus Hosszejni & Hedibert Freitas Lopes, 2023. "When It Counts—Econometric Identification of the Basic Factor Model Based on GLT Structures," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-30, November.
    17. Hauber, Philipp & Schumacher, Christian, 2021. "Precision-based sampling with missing observations: A factor model application," Discussion Papers 11/2021, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    18. Kaufmann, Sylvia & Schumacher, Christian, 2019. "Bayesian estimation of sparse dynamic factor models with order-independent and ex-post mode identification," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 116-134.
    19. Rémi Piatek & Pia Pinger, 2016. "Maintaining (Locus of) Control? Data Combination for the Identification and Inference of Factor Structure Models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 734-755, June.
    20. Klaus Wälde, 2016. "Emotion Research in Economics," CESifo Working Paper Series 5982, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0279444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.