IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0274278.html

Disproportionate impacts of COVID-19 on marginalized and minoritized early-career academic scientists

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah M Douglas
  • Isis H Settles
  • Erin A Cech
  • Georgina M Montgomery
  • Lexi R Nadolsky
  • Arika K Hawkins
  • Guizhen Ma
  • Tangier M Davis
  • Kevin C Elliott
  • Kendra Spence Cheruvelil

Abstract

Early research on the impact of COVID-19 on academic scientists suggests that disruptions to research, teaching, and daily work life are not experienced equally. However, this work has overwhelmingly focused on experiences of women and parents, with limited attention to the disproportionate impact on academic work by race, disability status, sexual identity, first-generation status, and academic career stage. Using a stratified random survey sample of early-career academics in four science disciplines (N = 3,277), we investigated socio-demographic and career stage differences in the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic along seven work outcomes: changes in four work areas (research progress, workload, concern about career advancement, support from mentors) and work disruptions due to three COVID-19 related life challenges (physical health, mental health, and caretaking). Our analyses examined patterns across career stages as well as separately for doctoral students and for postdocs/assistant professors. Overall, our results indicate that scientists from marginalized (i.e., devalued) and minoritized (i.e., underrepresented) groups across early career stages reported more negative work outcomes as a result of COVID-19. However, there were notable patterns of differences depending on the socio-demographic identities examined. Those with a physical or mental disability were negatively impacted on all seven work outcomes. Women, primary caregivers, underrepresented racial minorities, sexual minorities, and first-generation scholars reported more negative experiences across several outcomes such as increased disruptions due to physical health symptoms and additional caretaking compared to more privileged counterparts. Doctoral students reported more work disruptions from life challenges than other early-career scholars, especially those related to health problems, while assistant professors reported more negative changes in areas such as decreased research progress and increased workload. These findings suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately harmed work outcomes for minoritized and marginalized early-career scholars. Institutional interventions are required to address these inequalities in an effort to retain diverse cohorts in academic science.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah M Douglas & Isis H Settles & Erin A Cech & Georgina M Montgomery & Lexi R Nadolsky & Arika K Hawkins & Guizhen Ma & Tangier M Davis & Kevin C Elliott & Kendra Spence Cheruvelil, 2022. "Disproportionate impacts of COVID-19 on marginalized and minoritized early-career academic scientists," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0274278
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0274278
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0274278&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0274278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatyana Deryugina & Olga Shurchkov & Jenna Stearns, 2021. "COVID-19 Disruptions Disproportionately Affect Female Academics," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 111, pages 164-168, May.
    2. Kathryn Wagner & Summer Melody Pennell & Meike Eilert & Stacey R. Lim, 2022. "Academic mothers with disabilities: Navigating academia and parenthood during COVID‐19," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 342-352, January.
    3. KerryAnn O’Meara & Alexandra Kuvaeva & Gudrun Nyunt, 2017. "Constrained Choices: A View of Campus Service Inequality From Annual Faculty Reports," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 88(5), pages 672-700, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Gil & Constanza Hurtado-Acuna & Máximo Quiero-Bastías & Marigen Narea & Alejandra Caqueo-Urízar, 2023. "Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on researchers: evidence from Chile and Colombia," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Jiao, Yang & Qi, Li & Chen, Zhuo, 2023. "Academic profile of Chinese economists: Productivity, pay, time use, gender differences, and impacts of COVID-19," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Ayllón, Sara, 2022. "Online teaching and gender bias," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Mackenzie Alston & Tatyana Deryugina & Olga Shurchkov, 2025. "Leaving Money on the Table," NBER Working Papers 33657, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Biermann, Marcus, 2024. "Remote talks: Changes to economics seminars during COVID-19," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Constantin Bürgi & Klaus Wohlrabe, 2022. "The influence of Covid-19 on publications in economics: bibliometric evidence from five working paper series," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5175-5189, September.
    7. Davies, Benjamin, 2022. "Gender sorting among economists: Evidence from the NBER," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Delmelle, Elizabeth C. & Zhang, Ann Zian & Fasullo, Sofia & Casas, Irene, 2025. "Women in transport geography: Gender differences in research topics," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    9. Özlem Altan‐Olcay & Suzanne Bergeron, 2024. "Care in times of the pandemic: Rethinking meanings of work in the university," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1544-1559, July.
    10. Celeste Suart & Kaitlyn Neuman & Ray Truant, 2022. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceived publication pressure among academic researchers in Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Veronica Martinez Acosta & Carlita Favero & Barbara Lom & Deanne Buffalari & Amy Jo Stavnezer & Leah Chase, 2025. "Ten simple rules for faculty members building just and equitable environments in academic science," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Amanda Esquivel & Simona Marincean & Marilee Benore, 2023. "The effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on STEM faculty: Productivity and work-life balance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-10, January.
    13. José J. Domínguez & Natalia Montinari, 2021. "Gender Quotas and Task Assignment in Organizations," ThE Papers 21/13, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    14. Stephanie Pfirman & Monica Gaughan, 2025. "Polar Plasticity: Impact of COVID-19 on the US Polar Research Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-28, February.
    15. Schmal, W. Benedikt & Haucap, Justus & Knoke, Leon, 2023. "The role of gender and coauthors in academic publication behavior," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(10).
    16. Nakajima, Kazuki & Liu, Ruodan & Shudo, Kazuyuki & Masuda, Naoki, 2023. "Quantifying gender imbalance in East Asian academia: Research career and citation practice," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    17. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Ida Mele, 2022. "Impact of Covid-19 on research output by gender across countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 6811-6826, December.
    18. Claudia Acciai & Benjamin C Holding & Jesper W. Schneider & Mathias W. Nielsen, 2022. "Institution and gender-related differences in publication speed before and during COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Mónica Lopes & Virgínia Ferreira & Caynnã Santos, 2023. "Gendered Micropolitics in Academic Work Environments: Uncovering Microaggressions during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Navdeep Dhillon & Gurvinder Kaur, 2021. "Self-Assessment of Teachers’ Communication Style and Its Impact on Their Communication Effectiveness: A Study of Indian Higher Educational Institutions," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0274278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.