IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0272695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of the phrase “data not shown” in dental research

Author

Listed:
  • Eero Raittio
  • Ahmad Sofi-Mahmudi
  • Erfan Shamsoddin

Abstract

Objective: The use of phrases such as “data/results not shown” is deemed an obscure way to represent scientific findings. Our aim was to investigate how frequently papers published in dental journals use the phrases and what kind of results the authors referred to with these phrases in 2021. Methods: We searched the Europe PubMed Central (PMC) database for open-access articles available from studies published in PubMed-indexed dental journals until December 31st, 2021. We searched for “data/results not shown” phrases from the full texts and then calculated the proportion of articles with the phrases in all the available articles. From studies published in 2021, we evaluated whether the phrases referred to confirmatory results, negative results, peripheral results, sensitivity analysis results, future results, or other/unclear results. Journal- and publisher-related differences in publishing studies with the phrases in 2021 were tested with Fisher’s exact test using the R v4.1.1 software. Results: The percentage of studies with the relevant phrases from the total number of studies in the database decreased from 13% to 3% between 2010 and 2020. In 2021, out of 2,434 studies published in 73 different journals by eight publishers, 67 (2.8%) used the phrases. Potential journal- and publisher-related differences in publishing studies with the phrases were detected in 2021 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). Most commonly, the phrases referred to negative (n = 16, 24%), peripheral (n = 22, 33%) or confirmatory (n = 11, 16%) results. The significance of unpublished results to which the phrases referred considerably varied across studies. Conclusion: Over the last decade, there has been a marked decrease in the use of the phrases “data/results not shown” in dental journals. However, the phrases were still notably in use in dental studies in 2021, despite the good availability of accessible free online supplements and repositories.

Suggested Citation

  • Eero Raittio & Ahmad Sofi-Mahmudi & Erfan Shamsoddin, 2022. "The use of the phrase “data not shown” in dental research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-11, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0272695
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0272695
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0272695&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0272695?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stylianos Serghiou & Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis & Kevin W Boyack & Nico Riedel & Joshua D Wallach & John P A Ioannidis, 2021. "Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Vicente-Saez, Ruben & Gustafsson, Robin & Van den Brande, Lieve, 2020. "The dawn of an open exploration era: Emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joachim Schöpfel & Otmane Azeroual & Monika Jungbauer-Gans, 2020. "Research Ethics, Open Science and CRIS," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Antonello Cammarano & Vincenzo Varriale & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2022. "Open and Crowd-Based Platforms: Impact on Organizational and Market Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Giovanni Colavizza & Lauren Cadwallader & Marcel LaFlamme & Grégory Dozot & Stéphane Lecorney & Daniel Rappo & Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, 2024. "An analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Rijswijk, Kelly & de Vries, Jasper R. & Klerkx, Laurens & Turner, James A., 2023. "The enabling and constraining connections between trust and digitalisation in incumbent value chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    5. Gabriel Gonçalves da Costa & Kleber Neves & Olavo Amaral, 2024. "Estimating the replicability of highly cited clinical research (2004–2018)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Emmanuel A Zavalis & John P A Ioannidis, 2022. "A meta-epidemiological assessment of transparency indicators of infectious disease models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-13, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0272695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.