IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0264920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How did the COVID-19 pandemic impact the stress vulnerability of employed and non-employed nursing students in Romania?

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela Simionescu
  • Elena-Nicoleta Bordea
  • Angelo Pellegrini

Abstract

In the light of the current COVID-19 pandemic, being considered a present challenge for public health, the main purpose of this work is to analyze the vulnerability to stress of a sample of nursing students in Romania considering their status on labour market (employed students in the medical system and non-employed students) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Employed students were more vulnerable to stress comparing to non-employed ones during the pandemic. In addition to this, the nursing students working in the medical system experienced medium vulnerability to stress during the pandemic comparing to those working before the pandemic who experienced a low vulnerability to stress. Excepting the non-employed students before the pandemic, the females were more vulnerable to stress comparing to the males in the sample and the students living in the country experienced a higher level of stress comparing to those living in the urban area. During the pandemic, most of the employed nursing students expressed their fear of getting infected with COVID-19, this representing the most stressful factor for them, while most of them mentioned the self-control as being the most proper strategy for them to cope with stress. These empirical findings have practical implications for stress control among present and future nurses, for management of medical units and for higher education nursing.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela Simionescu & Elena-Nicoleta Bordea & Angelo Pellegrini, 2022. "How did the COVID-19 pandemic impact the stress vulnerability of employed and non-employed nursing students in Romania?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0264920
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0264920
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0264920&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0264920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rasool Eslami Akbar & Nasrin Elahi & Eesa Mohammadi & Masoud Fallahi Khoshknab, 2016. "What Strategies Do the Nurses Apply to Cope With Job Stress?: A Qualitative Study," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 1-55, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Kuo-Tai & Chang, Kirk, 2022. "The efficacy of stress coping strategies in Taiwan's public utilities during the COVID-19 pandemic," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kinfong Leong & Pedro Fong & Chiufai Kuok & Lirong Meng, 2022. "Cross-Sectional Association and Influencing Factors of Job Satisfaction and Burnout Among Nurses in Macao," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    2. Ewa Kupcewicz & Marcin Jóźwik, 2019. "Positive Orientation and Strategies for Coping with Stress as Predictors of Professional Burnout among Polish Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0264920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.