IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0258182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthcare spending in U.S. emergency departments by health condition, 2006–2016

Author

Listed:
  • Kirstin Woody Scott
  • Angela Liu
  • Carina Chen
  • Alexander S Kaldjian
  • Amber K Sabbatini
  • Herbert C Duber
  • Joseph L Dieleman

Abstract

Background: Healthcare spending in the emergency department (ED) setting has received intense focus from policymakers in the United States (U.S.). Relatively few studies have systematically evaluated ED spending over time or disaggregated ED spending by policy-relevant groups, including health condition, age, sex, and payer to inform these discussions. This study’s objective is to estimate ED spending trends in the U.S. from 2006 to 2016, by age, sex, payer, and across 154 health conditions and assess ED spending per visit over time. Methods and findings: This observational study utilized the National Emergency Department Sample, a nationally representative sample of hospital-based ED visits in the U.S. to measure healthcare spending for ED care. All spending estimates were adjusted for inflation and presented in 2016 U.S. Dollars. Overall ED spending was $79.2 billion (CI, $79.2 billion-$79.2 billion) in 2006 and grew to $136.6 billion (CI, $136.6 billion-$136.6 billion) in 2016, representing a population-adjusted annualized rate of change of 4.4% (CI, 4.4%-4.5%) as compared to total healthcare spending (1.4% [CI, 1.4%-1.4%]) during that same ten-year period. The percentage of U.S. health spending attributable to the ED has increased from 3.9% (CI, 3.9%-3.9%) in 2006 to 5.0% (CI, 5.0%-5.0%) in 2016. Nearly equal parts of ED spending in 2016 was paid by private payers (49.3% [CI, 49.3%-49.3%]) and public payers (46.9% [CI, 46.9%-46.9%]), with the remainder attributable to out-of-pocket spending (3.9% [CI, 3.9%-3.9%]). In terms of key groups, the majority of ED spending was allocated among females (versus males) and treat-and-release patients (versus those hospitalized); those between age 20–44 accounted for a plurality of ED spending. Road injuries, falls, and urinary diseases witnessed the highest levels of ED spending, accounting for 14.1% (CI, 13.1%-15.1%) of total ED spending in 2016. ED spending per visit also increased over time from $660.0 (CI, $655.1-$665.2) in 2006 to $943.2 (CI, $934.3-$951.6) in 2016, or at an annualized rate of 3.4% (CI, 3.3%-3.4%). Conclusions: Though ED spending accounts for a relatively small portion of total health system spending in the U.S., ED spending is sizable and growing. Understanding which diseases are driving this spending is helpful for informing value-based reforms that can impact overall health care costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirstin Woody Scott & Angela Liu & Carina Chen & Alexander S Kaldjian & Amber K Sabbatini & Herbert C Duber & Joseph L Dieleman, 2021. "Healthcare spending in U.S. emergency departments by health condition, 2006–2016," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0258182
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0258182
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0258182&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0258182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindsay Allen & Janet R. Cummings & Jason Hockenberry, 2019. "Urgent Care Centers and the Demand for Non-Emergent Emergency Department Visits," NBER Working Papers 25428, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Joseph L. Dieleman & Ranju Baral & Elizabeth Johnson & Anne Bulchis & Maxwell Birger & Anthony L. Bui & Madeline Campbell & Abigail Chapin & Rose Gabert & Hannah Hamavid & Cody Horst & Jonathan Joseph, 2017. "Adjusting health spending for the presence of comorbidities: an application to United States national inpatient data," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosella Levaggi & Marcello Montefiori & Luca Persico, 2020. "Speeding up the clinical pathways by accessing emergency departments," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(1), pages 37-44, February.
    2. Zeltzer, Dan & Einav, Liran & Chasid, Avichai & Balicer, Ran D., 2021. "Supply-side variation in the use of emergency departments," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Michael Stucki, 2021. "Factors related to the change in Swiss inpatient costs by disease: a 6-factor decomposition," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(2), pages 195-221, March.
    4. Sonia Bhalotra & Letícia Nunes & Rudi Rocha, 2020. "Urgent Care Centers, Hospital Performance and Population Health," Working Papers 10, Instituto de Estudos para Políticas de Saúde.
    5. Idaira Rodriguez Santana & María José Aragón & Nigel Rice & Anne Rosemary Mason, 2020. "Trends in and drivers of healthcare expenditure in the English NHS: a retrospective analysis," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Shooshan Danagoulian & Daniel Grossman & David Slusky, 2022. "Health Care Following Environmental Disasters: Evidence from Flint," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 1060-1089, September.
    7. Currie, Janet & Karpova, Anastasia & Zeltzer, Dan, 2023. "Do urgent care centers reduce Medicare spending?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Anne Mason & Idaira Rodriguez Santana & María José Aragón & Nigel Rice & Martin Chalkley & Raphael Wittenberg & Jose-Luis Fernandez, 2019. "Drivers of health care expenditure: Final report," Working Papers 169cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0258182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.