IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0240968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cluster feasibility trial to explore the uptake and use of e-cigarettes versus usual care offered to smokers attending homeless centres in Great Britain

Author

Listed:
  • Lynne Dawkins
  • Linda Bauld
  • Allison Ford
  • Deborah Robson
  • Peter Hajek
  • Steve Parrott
  • Catherine Best
  • Jinshuo Li
  • Allan Tyler
  • Isabelle Uny
  • Sharon Cox

Abstract

Smoking rates in the UK are at an all-time low but this masks considerable inequalities; prevalence amongst adults who are homeless remains four times higher than the national average. The objective of this trial was to assess the feasibility of supplying free e-cigarette starter kits to smokers accessing homeless centres and to estimate parameters to inform a possible future larger trial. In this feasibility cluster trial, four homeless centres in Great Britain were non-randomly allocated to either a Usual Care (UC) or E-Cigarette (EC) arm. Smokers attending the centres were recruited by staff. UC arm participants (N = 32) received advice to quit and signposting to the local Stop Smoking Service. EC arm participants (N = 48) received an EC starter kit and 4-weeks supply of e-liquid. Outcome measures were recruitment and retention rates, use of ECs, smoking cessation/reduction and completion of measures required for economic evaluation. Eighty (mean age 43 years; 65% male) of the 153 eligible participants who were invited to participate, were successfully recruited (52%) within a five-month period, and 47 (59%) of these were retained at 24 weeks. The EC intervention was well received with minimal negative effects and very few unintended consequences (e.g. lost, theft, adding illicit substances). In both study arm, depression and anxiety scores declined over the duration of the study. Substance dependence scores remained constant. Assuming those with missing follow up data were smoking, CO validated sustained abstinence at 24 weeks was 3/48 (6.25%) and 0/32 (0%) respectively for the EC and UC arms. Almost all participants present at follow-up visits completed data collection for healthcare service and health-related quality of life measures. Providing an e-cigarette starter kit to smokers experiencing homelessness was associated with reasonable recruitment and retention rates and promising evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynne Dawkins & Linda Bauld & Allison Ford & Deborah Robson & Peter Hajek & Steve Parrott & Catherine Best & Jinshuo Li & Allan Tyler & Isabelle Uny & Sharon Cox, 2020. "A cluster feasibility trial to explore the uptake and use of e-cigarettes versus usual care offered to smokers attending homeless centres in Great Britain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0240968
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240968
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240968&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0240968?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonie S Brose & Andy McEwen, 2016. "Neighbourhood Deprivation and Outcomes of Stop Smoking Support – An Observational Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, January.
    2. Thirlway, Frances, 2016. "Everyday tactics in local moral worlds: E-cigarette practices in a working-class area of the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 106-113.
    3. Scott R. Weaver & Ban A. Majeed & Terry F. Pechacek & Amy L. Nyman & Kyle R. Gregory & Michael P. Eriksen, 2016. "Use of electronic nicotine delivery systems and other tobacco products among USA adults, 2014: results from a national survey," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(2), pages 177-188, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claire Adams Spears & Dina M. Jones & Scott R. Weaver & Terry F. Pechacek & Michael P. Eriksen, 2016. "Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems among Adults with Mental Health Conditions, 2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Johanna Catherine Maclean & John Buckell & Joachim Marti, 2019. "Information Source and Cigarettes: Experimental Evidence on the Messenger Effect," NBER Working Papers 25632, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. David T. Levy & Zhe Yuan & Yameng Li, 2017. "The Prevalence and Characteristics of E-Cigarette Users in the U.S," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, October.
    4. David Adzrago & Melissa B. Harrell & Kayo Fujimoto & Antwan Jones & J. Michael Wilkerson, 2023. "Association between E-Cigarette Use Behaviors and Anxiety/Depression among Black/African American Adults Based on Sexual Identity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, January.
    5. David T. Levy & Zhe Yuan & Yameng Li & Darren Mays & Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero, 2019. "An Examination of the Variation in Estimates of E-Cigarette Prevalence among U.S. Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Buckell, John & White, Justin S. & Shang, Ce, 2020. "Can incentive-compatibility reduce hypothetical bias in smokers’ experimental choice behavior? A randomized discrete choice experiment," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    7. Christine E. Sheffer & Abdulmohsen Al-Zalabani & Andrée Aubrey & Rasha Bader & Claribel Beltrez & Susan Bennett & Ellen Carl & Caroline Cranos & Audrey Darville & Jennifer Greyber & Maher Karam-Hage &, 2021. "The Emerging Global Tobacco Treatment Workforce: Characteristics of Tobacco Treatment Specialists Trained in Council-Accredited Training Programs from 2017 to 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Jingfen Zhu & Fanghui Shi & Gang Xu & Na Li & Jiahui Li & Yaping He & Jinming Yu, 2019. "Conventional Cigarette and E-Cigarette Smoking among School Personnel in Shanghai, China: Prevalence and Determinants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-13, September.
    9. Shérazade Kinouani & Edwige Pereira & Christophe Tzourio, 2017. "Electronic Cigarette Use in Students and Its Relation with Tobacco-Smoking: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the i-Share Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Love-Koh, James & Pennington, Becky & Owen, Lesley & Taylor, Matthew & Griffin, Susan, 2020. "How health inequalities accumulate and combine to affect treatment value: A distributional cost-effectiveness analysis of smoking cessation interventions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    11. P. V. Asharani & Vanessa Ai Ling Seet & Edimansyah Abdin & Fiona Devi Siva Kumar & Peizhi Wang & Kumarasan Roystonn & Ying Ying Lee & Laxman Cetty & Wen Lin Teh & Swapna Verma & Yee Ming Mok & Daniel , 2020. "Smoking and Mental Illness: Prevalence, Patterns and Correlates of Smoking and Smoking Cessation among Psychiatric Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Ce Shang & Scott R. Weaver & Nahleen Zahra & Jidong Huang & Kai-Wen Cheng & Frank J. Chaloupka, 2018. "The Association between Potential Exposure to Magazine Ads with Voluntary Health Warnings and the Perceived Harmfulness of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, March.
    13. Thirlway, Frances, 2019. "Nicotine addiction as a moral problem: Barriers to e-cigarette use for smoking cessation in two working-class areas in Northern England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0240968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.