IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0204232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

For socially engaged science: The dynamics of knowledge production in the Fiocruz graduate program in the framework of the "Brazil Without Extreme Poverty Plan"

Author

Listed:
  • Rebeca Buzzo Feltrin
  • Maria Cristina Rodrigues Guilam
  • Manoel Barral-Netto
  • Nísia Trindade Lima
  • Milton Ozório Moraes

Abstract

Public policy planning associated with the management of the Science, Technology, and Innovation is decisive to improve public health. It is important to develop novel strategies to plan, supervise, manage, use and evaluate research using indicators that extrapolates metrics in current use. In 2011, the Brazilian government introduced the Brazil Without Extreme Poverty plan (BWEP) that aimed to integrate several conditional cash transfer programs (CCT). The original that aimed to integrate of the CCTs were expanded in order to integrate social justice and dignity that induced several actions towards the promotion of social development of the beneficiaries. An induced action involved a partnership between BWEP (From the Ministry of Social Development), CAPES (Brazilian Higher Education Agency) and The Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ, a Public Health Institution), that dedicated scholarships for PhD and postdoc students committed to the BWEP to promote health research in its multiple approaches and the vulnerable associated population. Using the Social Studies of Science and Technology (SSST) framework, this paper analyzes the dynamics of knowledge production in the context of program implementation. Herein, we report on the follow-up activities performed in BWEP Health Action, directing research projects to align with the goals of the program, evaluating the progress of these research, and defining strategies for improved their management. We analyze the advances and difficulties encountered in the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of this innovative program in the academic training level, and we emphasize the critical need to expand and improve similar initiatives aimed at guiding the scientific and technological production in health to meet the social demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebeca Buzzo Feltrin & Maria Cristina Rodrigues Guilam & Manoel Barral-Netto & Nísia Trindade Lima & Milton Ozório Moraes, 2018. "For socially engaged science: The dynamics of knowledge production in the Fiocruz graduate program in the framework of the "Brazil Without Extreme Poverty Plan"," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204232
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204232
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204232&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0204232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John P A Ioannidis, 2014. "How to Make More Published Research True," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-6, October.
    2. Joilda Silva Nery & Susan Martins Pereira & Davide Rasella & Maria Lúcia Fernandes Penna & Rosana Aquino & Laura Cunha Rodrigues & Mauricio Lima Barreto & Gerson Oliveira Penna, 2014. "Effect of the Brazilian Conditional Cash Transfer and Primary Health Care Programs on the New Case Detection Rate of Leprosy," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-7, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Reis-Santos & Priya Shete & Adelmo Bertolde & Carolina M Sales & Mauro N Sanchez & Denise Arakaki-Sanchez & Kleydson B Andrade & M Gabriela M Gomes & Delia Boccia & Christian Lienhardt & Ethel, 2019. "Tuberculosis in Brazil and cash transfer programs: A longitudinal database study of the effect of cash transfer on cure rates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Stylianos Serghiou & Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis & Kevin W Boyack & Nico Riedel & Joshua D Wallach & John P A Ioannidis, 2021. "Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Kiri, Bralind & Lacetera, Nicola & Zirulia, Lorenzo, 2018. "Above a swamp: A theory of high-quality scientific production," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 827-839.
    4. Stefan Stieglitz & Christian Meske & Björn Ross & Milad Mirbabaie, 2020. "Going Back in Time to Predict the Future - The Complex Role of the Data Collection Period in Social Media Analytics," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 395-409, April.
    5. Shareen A Iqbal & Joshua D Wallach & Muin J Khoury & Sheri D Schully & John P A Ioannidis, 2016. "Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Peter Van Schuerbeek & Chris Baeken & Johan De Mey, 2016. "The Heterogeneity in Retrieved Relations between the Personality Trait ‘Harm Avoidance’ and Gray Matter Volumes Due to Variations in the VBM and ROI Labeling Processing Settings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Suresh H. Moolgavkar & Ellen T. Chang & Heather N. Watson & Edmund C. Lau, 2018. "An Assessment of the Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model for Epidemiologic Studies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(4), pages 777-794, April.
    8. Shahadat Uddin & Nazim Choudhury & Md Ekramul Hossain, 2019. "A research framework to explore knowledge evolution and scholarly quantification of collaborative research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 789-803, May.
    9. Salandra, Rossella & Criscuolo, Paola & Salter, Ammon, 2021. "Directing scientists away from potentially biased publications: the role of systematic reviews in health care," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    10. Johnson, Sarah C. & Cavallaro, Francesca L. & Leon, David A., 2017. "A systematic review of allostatic load in relation to socioeconomic position: Poor fidelity and major inconsistencies in biomarkers employed," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 66-73.
    11. Antonio Fernando Boing & S. V. Subramanian & Alexandra Crispim Boing, 2019. "Reducing socioeconomic inequalities in life expectancy among municipalities: the Brazilian experience," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(5), pages 713-720, June.
    12. Luke Holman & Devi Stuart-Fox & Cindy E Hauser, 2018. "The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Ilya Plyusnin & Liisa Holm & Petri Törönen, 2019. "Novel comparison of evaluation metrics for gene ontology classifiers reveals drastic performance differences," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, November.
    14. Leonid Tiokhin & Minhua Yan & Thomas J. H. Morgan, 2021. "Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(7), pages 857-867, July.
    15. Denes Szucs & John P A Ioannidis, 2017. "Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Anne-Laure Boulesteix, 2015. "Ten Simple Rules for Reducing Overoptimistic Reporting in Methodological Computational Research," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-6, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.