IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0202735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards improved health service quality in Tanzania: An approach to increase efficiency and effectiveness of routine supportive supervision

Author

Listed:
  • Sabine Renggli
  • Iddy Mayumana
  • Dominick Mboya
  • Christopher Charles
  • Justin Maeda
  • Christopher Mshana
  • Flora Kessy
  • Fabrizio Tediosi
  • Constanze Pfeiffer
  • Alexander Schulze
  • Ann Aerts
  • Christian Lengeler

Abstract

Effective supportive supervision of healthcare services is crucial for improving and maintaining quality of care. However, this process can be challenging in an environment with chronic shortage of qualified human resources, overburdened healthcare providers, multiple roles of district managers, weak supply chains, high donor fragmentation and inefficient allocation of limited financial resources. Operating in this environment, we systematically evaluated an approach developed in Tanzania to strengthen the implementation of routine supportive supervision of primary healthcare providers. The approach included a systematic quality assessment at health facilities using an electronic tool and subsequent result dissemination at council level. Mixed methods were used to compare the new supportive supervision approach with routine supportive supervision. Qualitative data was collected through in-depth interviews in three councils. Observational data and informal communication as well as secondary data complemented the data set. Additionally, an economic costing analysis was carried out in the same councils. Compared to routine supportive supervision, the new approach increased healthcare providers’ knowledge and skills, as well as quality of data collected and acceptance of supportive supervision amongst stakeholders involved. It also ensured better availability of evidence for follow-up actions, including budgeting and planning, and higher stakeholder motivation and ownership of subsequent quality improvement measures. The new approach reduced time and cost spent during supportive supervision. This increased feasibility of supportive supervision and hence the likelihood of its implementation. Thus, the results presented together with previous findings suggested that if used as the standard approach for routine supportive supervision the new approach offers a suitable option to make supportive supervision more efficient and effective and therewith more sustainable. Moreover, the new approach also provides informed guidance to overcome several problems of supportive supervision and healthcare quality assessments in low- and middle income countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabine Renggli & Iddy Mayumana & Dominick Mboya & Christopher Charles & Justin Maeda & Christopher Mshana & Flora Kessy & Fabrizio Tediosi & Constanze Pfeiffer & Alexander Schulze & Ann Aerts & Christ, 2018. "Towards improved health service quality in Tanzania: An approach to increase efficiency and effectiveness of routine supportive supervision," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0202735
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202735
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202735&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0202735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoko Akachi & Margaret E. Kruk, 2017. "Quality of care: Measuring a neglected driver of improved health," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-135, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Marzia Lazzerini & Venera Shukurova & Marina Davletbaeva & Kubanychbek Monolbaev & Tatiana Kulichenko & Yuri Akoev & Maya Bakradze & Tea Margieva & Ilya Mityushino & Leyla Namazova-Baranova & Elnura B, 2017. "Improving the quality of hospital care for children by supportive supervision: A cluster randomized trial, Kyrgyzstan," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-140, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Yoko Akachi & Margaret E. Kruk, 2017. "Quality of care: Measuring a neglected driver of improved health," WIDER Working Paper Series 135, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Mayumana, Iddy & Borghi, Jo & Anselmi, Laura & Mamdani, Masuma & Lange, Siri, 2017. "Effects of Payment for Performance on accountability mechanisms: Evidence from Pwani, Tanzania," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 61-73.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarkar, Nandini D.P. & Bunders-Aelen, Joske & Criel, Bart, 2018. "The complex challenge of providing patient-centred perinatal healthcare in rural Uganda: A qualitative enquiry," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 82-89.
    2. Kovacs, Roxanne J. & Lagarde, Mylène, 2022. "Does high workload reduce the quality of healthcare? Evidence from rural Senegal," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113759, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Kovacs, Roxanne & Lagarde, Mylene, 2022. "Does high workload reduce the quality of healthcare? Evidence from rural Senegal," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Cassidy, Rachel & Tomoaia-Cotisel, Andrada & Semwanga, Agnes Rwashana & Binyaruka, Peter & Chalabi, Zaid & Blanchet, Karl & Singh, Neha S. & Maiba, John & Borghi, Josephine, 2021. "Understanding the maternal and child health system response to payment for performance in Tanzania using a causal loop diagram approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    5. Dimitri Renmans & Nathalie Holvoet & Bart Criel, 2017. "Combining Theory-Driven Evaluation and Causal Loop Diagramming for Opening the ‘Black Box’ of an Intervention in the Health Sector: A Case of Performance-Based Financing in Western Uganda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Singh, Neha S. & Kovacs, Roxanne J. & Cassidy, Rachel & Kristensen, Søren R. & Borghi, Josephine & Brown, Garrett W., 2021. "A realist review to assess for whom, under what conditions and how pay for performance programmes work in low- and middle-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0202735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.