IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0200733.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing effects of dispersal on the bias of 2-sample mark-recapture estimators of stream fish abundance

Author

Listed:
  • James N McNair
  • Carl R Ruetz III
  • Ariana Carlson
  • Jiyeon Suh

Abstract

The 2-sample mark-recapture method with Chapman’s estimator is often used by inland fishery managers to estimate the reach-scale abundance of stream fish. An important assumption of this method is that no dispersal into or out of the study reach occurs between the two samples. Violations of this assumption are probably common in practice, but their effect on bias (systematic error) of abundance estimates is poorly understood, especially in small populations. Estimation methods permitting dispersal exist but, for logistical reasons, often are infeasible for routine assessments in streams. The purpose of this paper is to extend available results regarding effects of dispersal on the bias of Chapman’s estimator as applied to reach-scale studies of stream fish abundance. We examine for the first time the joint effects of dispersal and sampling variation on the bias of this estimator. To reduce the bias effects of dispersal, we propose a modified sampling scheme in which the original study reach is expanded, a central subreach is sampled during the mark session (sample 1), and the entire reach is sampled during the recapture session (sample 2). This modified sampling scheme can substantially reduce bias effects of dispersal without requiring unique marking of individual fish or additional site visits. Analytical and simulation results show that sampling variation tends to create negative bias with respect to study-reach abundance, while dispersal tends to create positive bias; the net effect can be positive, negative, or zero, depending on the true abundance, capture probabilities, and amount and nature of dispersal. In most cases, simply expanding the study reach is an effective way to reduce dispersal-related bias of Chapman’s estimator, but expanding the study reach and employing the modified sampling scheme we propose is a better alternative for accurately estimating abundance with the same level of sampling effort.

Suggested Citation

  • James N McNair & Carl R Ruetz III & Ariana Carlson & Jiyeon Suh, 2018. "Reducing effects of dispersal on the bias of 2-sample mark-recapture estimators of stream fish abundance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-31, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200733
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200733
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200733&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0200733?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I. B. J. Goudie & M. Goudie, 2007. "Who captures the marks for the Petersen estimator?," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(3), pages 825-839, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salgado Chavez, Edgar, 2017. "Essays on beliefs, democracy and local labor markets: an empirical examination for Peru," Economics PhD Theses 0717, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    2. Edgar Salgado Chavez, 2018. "Growing Up in a War: The Shaping of Trust and Identity After Conflict in Peru," Working Paper Series 0618, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    3. Chang Xuan Mao & Ruochen Huang & Sijia Zhang, 2017. "Petersen estimator, Chapman adjustment, list effects, and heterogeneity," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 167-173, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.