IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0158519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bark and Ambrosia Beetles Show Different Invasion Patterns in the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Rassati
  • Massimo Faccoli
  • Robert A Haack
  • Robert J Rabaglia
  • Edoardo Petrucco Toffolo
  • Andrea Battisti
  • Lorenzo Marini

Abstract

Non-native bark and ambrosia beetles represent a threat to forests worldwide. Their invasion patterns are, however, still unclear. Here we investigated first, if the spread of non-native bark and ambrosia beetles is a gradual or a discontinuous process; second, which are the main correlates of their community structure; third, whether those correlates correspond to those of native species. We used data on species distribution of non-native and native scolytines in the continental 48 USA states. These data were analyzed through a beta-diversity index, partitioned into species richness differences and species replacement, using Mantel correlograms and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination for identifying spatial patterns, and regression on distance matrices to test the association of climate (temperature, rainfall), forest (cover area, composition), geographical (distance), and human-related (import) variables with β-diversity components. For both non-native bark and ambrosia beetles, β-diversity was mainly composed of species richness difference than species replacement. For non-native bark beetles, a discontinuous invasion process composed of long distance jumps or multiple introduction events was apparent. Species richness differences were primarily correlated with differences in import values while temperature was the main correlate of species replacement. For non-native ambrosia beetles, a more continuous invasion process was apparent, with the pool of non-native species arriving in the coastal areas that tended to be filtered as they spread to interior portions of the continental USA. Species richness differences were mainly correlated with differences in rainfall among states, while rainfall and temperature were the main correlates of species replacement. Our study suggests that the different ecology of bark and ambrosia beetles influences their invasion process in new environments. The lower dependency that bark beetles have on climate allowed them to potentially colonize more areas within the USA, while non-native ambrosia beetles, being dependent on rainfall, are typically filtered by the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Rassati & Massimo Faccoli & Robert A Haack & Robert J Rabaglia & Edoardo Petrucco Toffolo & Andrea Battisti & Lorenzo Marini, 2016. "Bark and Ambrosia Beetles Show Different Invasion Patterns in the USA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0158519
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158519
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158519&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0158519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen Lin & Guofa Zhou & Xinyue Cheng & Rumei Xu, 2007. "Fast Economic Development Accelerates Biological Invasions in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-6, November.
    2. Juliann E Aukema & Brian Leung & Kent Kovacs & Corey Chivers & Kerry O Britton & Jeffrey Englin & Susan J Frankel & Robert G Haight & Thomas P Holmes & Andrew M Liebhold & Deborah G McCullough & Betsy, 2011. "Economic Impacts of Non-Native Forest Insects in the Continental United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-7, September.
    3. Christelle Robinet & Alain Roques & Hongyang Pan & Guofei Fang & Jianren Ye & Yanzhuo Zhang & Jianghua Sun, 2009. "Role of Human-Mediated Dispersal in the Spread of the Pinewood Nematode in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(2), pages 1-10, February.
    4. Dingcheng Huang & Runzhi Zhang & Ke Chung Kim & Andrew V Suarez, 2012. "Spatial Pattern and Determinants of the First Detection Locations of Invasive Alien Species in Mainland China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-7, February.
    5. Steven James Bacon & Sven Bacher & Alexandre Aebi, 2012. "Gaps in Border Controls Are Related to Quarantine Alien Insect Invasions in Europe," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-9, October.
    6. Goslee, Sarah C. & Urban, Dean L., 2007. "The ecodist Package for Dissimilarity-based Analysis of Ecological Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i07).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Damian C. Adams & Andres Susaeta & Jose R. Soto & Frederick Rossi & Paloma Carton Grammont & William A. Messina & Frank H. Koch & Demian Gomez & Jiri Hulcr, 2020. "A bioeconomic model for estimating potential economic damages from a hypothetical Asian beetle introduced via future trade with Cuba," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 33-58, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alka Chaudhary & Mriganka Shekhar Sarkar & Bhupendra Singh Adhikari & Gopal Singh Rawat, 2021. "Ageratina adenophora and Lantana camara in Kailash Sacred Landscape, India: Current distribution and future climatic scenarios through modeling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Yemshanov, Denys & Haight, Robert G. & Koch, Frank H. & Lu, Bo & Venette, Robert & Fournier, Ronald E. & Turgeon, Jean J., 2017. "Robust Surveillance and Control of Invasive Species Using a Scenario Optimization Approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 86-98.
    3. Anna C. Peterson & Himanshu Sharma & Arvind Kumar & Bruno M. Ghersi & Scott J. Emrich & Kurt J. Vandegrift & Amit Kapoor & Michael J. Blum, 2021. "Rodent Virus Diversity and Differentiation across Post-Katrina New Orleans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Hope, Emily S. & McKenney, Daniel W. & Pedlar, John H. & Lawrence, Kevin & MacDonald, Heather, 2021. "Canadian efforts to slow the spread of Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) are economically efficient," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Bjørn Økland & Olav Skarpaas & Martin Schroeder & Christer Magnusson & Åke Lindelöw & Karl Thunes, 2010. "Is Eradication of the Pinewood Nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) Likely? An Evaluation of Current Contingency Plans," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(9), pages 1424-1439, September.
    6. Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca S. & Liebhold, Andrew M., 2015. "Benefits of Invasion Prevention are Constrained by Lags and Timing of Invasion Impacts," RFF Working Paper Series dp-15-18, Resources for the Future.
    7. R. Bhalla & Neil Pelkey & K. Devi Prasad, 2011. "Application of GIS for Evaluation and Design of Watershed Guidelines," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(1), pages 113-140, January.
    8. repec:jss:jstsof:22:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Andrew R. Tilman & Robert G. Haight, 2023. "Public policy for management of forest pests within an ownership mosaic," Papers 2312.05403, arXiv.org.
    10. Charles Cunningham & Jorge E Parra & Lucy Coals & Marcela Beltrán & Sama Zefania & Tamás Székely, 2018. "Social interactions predict genetic diversification: an experimental manipulation in shorebirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(3), pages 609-618.
    11. Samantha Bothwell & Alex Kaizer & Ryan Peterson & Danielle Ostendorf & Victoria Catenacci & Julia Wrobel, 2023. "Pattern‐based clustering of daily weigh‐in trajectories using dynamic time warping," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2719-2731, September.
    12. Wilson Lara & Stella Bogino & Felipe Bravo, 2018. "Multilevel analysis of dendroclimatic series with the R-package BIOdry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, May.
    13. Kraker, Peter & Schlögl, Christian & Jack, Kris & Lindstaedt, Stefanie, 2015. "Visualization of co-readership patterns from an online reference management system," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 169-182.
    14. Soliman, T. & Hengeveld, G.M. & Robinet, C. & Mourits, Monique & van der Werf, Wopke & Oude Lansink, Alfons G.J.M., 2011. "A Risk Assessment Model on Pine Wood Nematode in the EU," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 116010, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Kneib, Thomas & Petzoldt, Thomas, 2007. "Introduction to the Special Volume on "Ecology and Ecological Modeling in R"," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i01).
    16. Stoeckl, Natalie & Dodd, Aaron & Kompas, Tom, 2023. "The monetary value of 16 services protected by the Australian National Biosecurity System: Spatially explicit estimates and vulnerability to incursions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    17. Carrasco, L.R. & Mumford, J.D. & MacLeod, A. & Harwood, T. & Grabenweger, G. & Leach, A.W. & Knight, J.D. & Baker, R.H.A., 2010. "Unveiling human-assisted dispersal mechanisms in invasive alien insects: Integration of spatial stochastic simulation and phenology models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(17), pages 2068-2075.
    18. Ekaterina Dolbunova & Alexandre Lucquin & T. Rowan McLaughlin & Manon Bondetti & Blandine Courel & Ester Oras & Henny Piezonka & Harry K. Robson & Helen Talbot & Kamil Adamczak & Konstantin Andreev & , 2023. "The transmission of pottery technology among prehistoric European hunter-gatherers," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(2), pages 171-183, February.
    19. Bushaj, Sabah & Büyüktahtakın, İ. Esra & Haight, Robert G., 2022. "Risk-averse multi-stage stochastic optimization for surveillance and operations planning of a forest insect infestation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 1094-1110.
    20. Dingcheng Huang & Robert A Haack & Runzhi Zhang, 2011. "Does Global Warming Increase Establishment Rates of Invasive Alien Species? A Centurial Time Series Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-5, September.
    21. Turner, Rachel A. & Polunin, Nicholas V.C. & Stead, Selina M., 2015. "Mapping inshore fisheries: Comparing observed and perceived distributions of pot fishing activity in Northumberland," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 173-181.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0158519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.