IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0154493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inferring Intra-Community Microbial Interaction Patterns from Metagenomic Datasets Using Associative Rule Mining Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Disha Tandon
  • Mohammed Monzoorul Haque
  • Sharmila S Mande

Abstract

The nature of inter-microbial metabolic interactions defines the stability of microbial communities residing in any ecological niche. Deciphering these interaction patterns is crucial for understanding the mode/mechanism(s) through which an individual microbial community transitions from one state to another (e.g. from a healthy to a diseased state). Statistical correlation techniques have been traditionally employed for mining microbial interaction patterns from taxonomic abundance data corresponding to a given microbial community. In spite of their efficiency, these correlation techniques can capture only 'pair-wise interactions'. Moreover, their emphasis on statistical significance can potentially result in missing out on several interactions that are relevant from a biological standpoint. This study explores the applicability of one of the earliest association rule mining algorithm i.e. the 'Apriori algorithm' for deriving 'microbial association rules' from the taxonomic profile of given microbial community. The classical Apriori approach derives association rules by analysing patterns of co-occurrence/co-exclusion between various '(subsets of) features/items' across various samples. Using real-world microbiome data, the efficiency/utility of this rule mining approach in deciphering multiple (biologically meaningful) association patterns between 'subsets/subgroups' of microbes (constituting microbiome samples) is demonstrated. As an example, association rules derived from publicly available gut microbiome datasets indicate an association between a group of microbes (Faecalibacterium, Dorea, and Blautia) that are known to have mutualistic metabolic associations among themselves. Application of the rule mining approach on gut microbiomes (sourced from the Human Microbiome Project) further indicated similar microbial association patterns in gut microbiomes irrespective of the gender of the subjects. A Linux implementation of the Association Rule Mining (ARM) software (customised for deriving 'microbial association rules' from microbiome data) is freely available for download from the following link: http://metagenomics.atc.tcs.com/arm.

Suggested Citation

  • Disha Tandon & Mohammed Monzoorul Haque & Sharmila S Mande, 2016. "Inferring Intra-Community Microbial Interaction Patterns from Metagenomic Datasets Using Associative Rule Mining Techniques," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0154493
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0154493
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0154493&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0154493?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter J. Turnbaugh & Ruth E. Ley & Micah Hamady & Claire M. Fraser-Liggett & Rob Knight & Jeffrey I. Gordon, 2007. "The Human Microbiome Project," Nature, Nature, vol. 449(7164), pages 804-810, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keiji Jindo & Jens A. Andersson & Foluke Quist-Wessel & Jackonia Onyango & Johannes W. A. Langeveld, 2023. "Gendered investment differences among smallholder farmers: evidence from a microcredit programme in western kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(6), pages 1489-1504, December.
    2. Saki Morita & Keiji Jindo & Petros Maliotis, 2023. "Exploring the Influence of Work Integration Social Enterprises on Consumers through Differentiated Customer Value Proposition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shilan Li & Jianxin Shi & Paul Albert & Hong-Bin Fang, 2022. "Dependence Structure Analysis and Its Application in Human Microbiome," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Jae-Chang Cho, 2021. "Human microbiome privacy risks associated with summary statistics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Pirjo Wacklin & Harri Mäkivuokko & Noora Alakulppi & Janne Nikkilä & Heli Tenkanen & Jarkko Räbinä & Jukka Partanen & Kari Aranko & Jaana Mättö, 2011. "Secretor Genotype (FUT2 gene) Is Strongly Associated with the Composition of Bifidobacteria in the Human Intestine," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-10, May.
    4. Ran Li & Yongming Wang & Han Hu & Yan Tan & Yingfei Ma, 2022. "Metagenomic analysis reveals unexplored diversity of archaeal virome in the human gut," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Barbara Emmenegger & Julien Massoni & Christine M. Pestalozzi & Miriam Bortfeld-Miller & Benjamin A. Maier & Julia A. Vorholt, 2023. "Identifying microbiota community patterns important for plant protection using synthetic communities and machine learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Margaret Coleman & Christopher Elkins & Bradford Gutting & Emmanuel Mongodin & Gloria Solano‐Aguilar & Isabel Walls, 2018. "Microbiota and Dose Response: Evolving Paradigm of Health Triangle," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(10), pages 2013-2028, October.
    7. Liangliang Zhang & Yushu Shi & Robert R. Jenq & Kim‐Anh Do & Christine B. Peterson, 2021. "Bayesian compositional regression with structured priors for microbiome feature selection," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 824-838, September.
    8. Sarah L Hagerty & Kent E Hutchison & Christopher A Lowry & Angela D Bryan, 2020. "An empirically derived method for measuring human gut microbiome alpha diversity: Demonstrated utility in predicting health-related outcomes among a human clinical sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Eman M Fouda, 2017. "Airway Microbiota and Allergic Diseases: Clinical Implications," International Journal of Pulmonary & Respiratory Sciences, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 1(5), pages 1-5, May.
    10. Kumar P Mainali & Sharon Bewick & Peter Thielen & Thomas Mehoke & Florian P Breitwieser & Shishir Paudel & Arjun Adhikari & Joshua Wolfe & Eric V Slud & David Karig & William F Fagan, 2017. "Statistical analysis of co-occurrence patterns in microbial presence-absence datasets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, November.
    11. Yunjia Lai & Chih-Wei Liu & Yifei Yang & Yun-Chung Hsiao & Hongyu Ru & Kun Lu, 2021. "High-coverage metabolomics uncovers microbiota-driven biochemical landscape of interorgan transport and gut-brain communication in mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Amirhossein Shamsaddini & Kimia Dadkhah & Patrick M Gillevet, 2020. "BiomMiner: An advanced exploratory microbiome analysis and visualization pipeline," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, June.
    13. Ruiz-Moreno, Héctor Alejandro & López-Tamayo, Ana María & Caro-Quintero, Alejandro & Husserl, Johana & González Barrios, Andrés Fernando, 2019. "Metagenome level metabolic network reconstruction analysis reveals the microbiome in the Bogotá River is functionally close to the microbiome in produced water," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 399(C), pages 1-12.
    14. Li, Jie & Shen, Xuzhu & Li, YaoTang, 2021. "Modeling the temporal dynamics of gut microbiota from a local community perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 460(C).
    15. Gregor Gorkiewicz & Gerhard G Thallinger & Slave Trajanoski & Stefan Lackner & Gernot Stocker & Thomas Hinterleitner & Christian Gülly & Christoph Högenauer, 2013. "Alterations in the Colonic Microbiota in Response to Osmotic Diarrhea," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Lena Takayasu & Wataru Suda & Eiichiro Watanabe & Shinji Fukuda & Kageyasu Takanashi & Hiroshi Ohno & Misako Takayasu & Hideki Takayasu & Masahira Hattori, 2017. "A 3-dimensional mathematical model of microbial proliferation that generates the characteristic cumulative relative abundance distributions in gut microbiomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Yingnan Gao & Ahmed Abdullah & Martin Wu, 2025. "The powerbend distribution provides a unified model for the species abundance distribution across animals, plants and microbes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, December.
    18. Zachary D Kurtz & Christian L Müller & Emily R Miraldi & Dan R Littman & Martin J Blaser & Richard A Bonneau, 2015. "Sparse and Compositionally Robust Inference of Microbial Ecological Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    19. Patricio S La Rosa & Berkley Shands & Elena Deych & Yanjiao Zhou & Erica Sodergren & George Weinstock & William D Shannon, 2012. "Statistical Object Data Analysis of Taxonomic Trees from Human Microbiome Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-12, November.
    20. Sean M Gibbons & Sean M Kearney & Chris S Smillie & Eric J Alm, 2017. "Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0154493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.