IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0122299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient Experience and Satisfaction with Inpatient Service: Development of Short Form Survey Instrument Measuring the Core Aspect of Inpatient Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Eliza L Y Wong
  • Angela Coulter
  • Paul Hewitson
  • Annie W L Cheung
  • Carrie H K Yam
  • Siu fai Lui
  • Wilson W S Tam
  • Eng-kiong Yeoh

Abstract

Patient experience reflects quality of care from the patients’ perspective; therefore, patients’ experiences are important data in the evaluation of the quality of health services. The development of an abbreviated, reliable and valid instrument for measuring inpatients’ experience would reflect the key aspect of inpatient care from patients’ perspective as well as facilitate quality improvement by cultivating patient engagement and allow the trends in patient satisfaction and experience to be measured regularly. The study developed a short-form inpatient instrument and tested its ability to capture a core set of inpatients’ experiences. The Hong Kong Inpatient Experience Questionnaire (HKIEQ) was established in 2010; it is an adaptation of the General Inpatient Questionnaire of the Care Quality Commission created by the Picker Institute in United Kingdom. This study used a consensus conference and a cross-sectional validation survey to create and validate a short-form of the Hong Kong Inpatient Experience Questionnaire (SF-HKIEQ). The short-form, the SF-HKIEQ, consisted of 18 items derived from the HKIEQ. The 18 items mainly covered relational aspects of care under four dimensions of the patient’s journey: hospital staff, patient care and treatment, information on leaving the hospital, and overall impression. The SF-HKIEQ had a high degree of face validity, construct validity and internal reliability. The validated SF-HKIEQ reflects the relevant core aspects of inpatients’ experience in a hospital setting. It provides a quick reference tool for quality improvement purposes and a platform that allows both healthcare staff and patients to monitor the quality of hospital care over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Eliza L Y Wong & Angela Coulter & Paul Hewitson & Annie W L Cheung & Carrie H K Yam & Siu fai Lui & Wilson W S Tam & Eng-kiong Yeoh, 2015. "Patient Experience and Satisfaction with Inpatient Service: Development of Short Form Survey Instrument Measuring the Core Aspect of Inpatient Experience," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0122299
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122299
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122299&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0122299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeremy Hurst & Melissa Jee-Hughes, 2001. "Performance Measurement and Performance Management in OECD Health Systems," OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers 47, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eggli, Yves & Halfon, Patricia & Chikhi, Mehdi & Bandi, Till, 2006. "Ambulatory healthcare information system: A conceptual framework," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 26-38, August.
    2. Schwartz, Robert & Deber, Raisa, 2016. "The performance measurement–management divide in public health," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 273-280.
    3. Paoli, Federico & Schmidt, Ingrid & Wigzell, Olivia & Ryś, Andrzej, 2019. "An EU approach to health system performance assessment: Building trust and learning from each other," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(4), pages 403-407.
    4. Waeger, Patricia, 2007. "Trade in health services: an analytical framework," Kiel Advanced Studies Working Papers 441, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Silvia Bruzzi & Enrico Ivaldi & Marta Santagata, 2022. "Measuring Regional Performance in the Italian NHS: Are Disparities Decreasing?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 1057-1084, February.
    6. Marion Devaux, 2015. "Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(1), pages 21-33, January.
    7. Fabiana da Cunha Saddi & Stephen Peckham & Gerald Bloom & Nick Turnbull & Vera Schattan Coelho & Jean-Louis Denis, 2023. "Employing the policy capacity framework for health system strengthening," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(1), pages 1-13.
    8. Miika Linna & Unto Häkkinen & Mikko Peltola & Jon Magnussen & Kjartan Anthun & Sverre Kittelsen & Annette Roed & Kim Olsen & Emma Medin & Clas Rehnberg, 2010. "Measuring cost efficiency in the Nordic Hospitals—a cross-sectional comparison of public hospitals in 2002," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 346-357, December.
    9. Richard Layte & Hannah McGee & Ann O'Hanlon, 2007. "Do Consultation Charges Deter General Practitioner Use Among Older People? A Natural Experiment," Papers WP194, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    10. Philippe Mossé & Caroline Maury & Nicolas Daumerie & Jean-Luc Roelandt, 2013. "Mental Health in France, Policies and Actors : Developing administrative knowledge in a segmented world," Post-Print halshs-00860156, HAL.
    11. Pamela Barbadoro & Antonella D’Alleva & Sara Galmozzi & Gemma Zocco & Francesco Di Stanislao & Emilia Prospero & Marcello Mario D’Errico, 2018. "Variations in diagnostic testing utilization in Italy: Secondary analysis of a national survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, June.
    12. Kruk, Margaret Elizabeth & Freedman, Lynn P., 2008. "Assessing health system performance in developing countries: A review of the literature," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 263-276, March.
    13. Layte, Richard & Nolan, Anne & McGee, Hannah & O'Hanlon, Ann, 2009. "Do consultation charges deter general practitioner use among older people? A natural experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(8), pages 1432-1438, April.
    14. Jaros{l}aw Wk{a}tr'obski & Aleksandra Bk{a}czkiewicz & Iga Rudawska, 2023. "A Strong Sustainability Paradigm Based Analytical Hierarchy Process (SSP-AHP) Method to Evaluate Sustainable Healthcare Systems," Papers 2306.00718, arXiv.org.
    15. Yuewen Sun & Xing Liu & Junfeng Jiang & Peigang Wang, 2018. "Comprehensive Evaluation Research on Healthcare Development in China from 2002 to 2014," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 1259-1278, August.
    16. Iwona Markowicz & Iga Rudawska, 2021. "Struggling with COVID-19—A Framework for Assessing Health System Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    17. Wente, Tobias & Vauth, Christoph, 2003. "Internationales Benchmarking von Gesundheitssystemen - Ansatz zur Problemlösung?," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-286, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    18. Vogt, Verena, 2016. "The contribution of locational factors to regional variations in office-based physicians in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 198-204.
    19. Kjeld Møller Pedersen, 2002. "The World Health Report 2000: dialogue of the deaf?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(2), pages 93-101, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0122299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.