IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0112764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models

Author

Listed:
  • Ren-Yan Duan
  • Xiao-Quan Kong
  • Min-Yi Huang
  • Wei-Yi Fan
  • Zhi-Gao Wang

Abstract

Background: Predicting species’ potential geographical range by species distribution models (SDMs) is central to understand their ecological requirements. However, the effects of using different modeling techniques need further investigation. In order to improve the prediction effect, we need to assess the predictive performance and stability of different SDMs. Methodology: We collected the distribution data of five common tree species (Pinus massoniana, Betula platyphylla, Quercus wutaishanica, Quercus mongolica and Quercus variabilis) and simulated their potential distribution area using 13 environmental variables and six widely used SDMs: BIOCLIM, DOMAIN, MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM. Each model run was repeated 100 times (trials). We compared the predictive performance by testing the consistency between observations and simulated distributions and assessed the stability by the standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and the 99% confidence interval of Kappa and AUC values. Results: The mean values of AUC and Kappa from MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM trials were similar and significantly higher than those from BIOCLIM and DOMAIN trials (p

Suggested Citation

  • Ren-Yan Duan & Xiao-Quan Kong & Min-Yi Huang & Wei-Yi Fan & Zhi-Gao Wang, 2014. "The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-8, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0112764
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112764
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112764&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0112764?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pecchi, Matteo & Marchi, Maurizio & Burton, Vanessa & Giannetti, Francesca & Moriondo, Marco & Bernetti, Iacopo & Bindi, Marco & Chirici, Gherardo, 2019. "Species distribution modelling to support forest management. A literature review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).
    2. Huayong Zhang & Shuang Zheng & Tousheng Huang & Jiangnan Liu & Junjie Yue, 2023. "Estimation of Potential Suitable Habitats for the Relict Plant Euptelea pleiosperma in China via Comparison of Three Niche Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Jan Altman & Kerstin Treydte & Vit Pejcha & Tomas Cerny & Petr Petrik & Miroslav Srutek & Jong-Suk Song & Valerie Trouet & Jiri Dolezal, 2020. "Tree growth response to recent warming of two endemic species in Northeast Asia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1345-1364, October.
    4. Karen E DeMatteo & Miguel A Rinas & Juan Pablo Zurano & Nicole Selleski & Rosio G Schneider & Carina F Argüelles, 2017. "Using niche-modelling and species-specific cost analyses to determine a multispecies corridor in a fragmented landscape," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Ana Cristina Mosebo Fernandes & Rebeca Quintero Gonzalez & Marie Ann Lenihan-Clarke & Ezra Francis Leslie Trotter & Jamal Jokar Arsanjani, 2020. "Machine Learning for Conservation Planning in a Changing Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-28, September.
    6. Santiago José Elías Velazco & Franklin Galvão & Fabricio Villalobos & Paulo De Marco Júnior, 2017. "Using worldwide edaphic data to model plant species niches: An assessment at a continental extent," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0112764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.