IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0107104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Ask, Do Tell: High Levels of Acceptability by Patients of Routine Collection of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data in Four Diverse American Community Health Centers

Author

Listed:
  • Sean Cahill
  • Robbie Singal
  • Chris Grasso
  • Dana King
  • Kenneth Mayer
  • Kellan Baker
  • Harvey Makadon

Abstract

Background: The Institute of Medicine and The Joint Commission have recommended asking sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) questions in clinical settings and including such data in Electronic Health Records (EHRs). This is increasingly viewed as a critical step toward systematically documenting and addressing health disparities affecting lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people. The U.S. government is currently considering whether to include SOGI data collection in the Stage 3 guidelines for the incentive program promoting meaningful use of EHR. However, some have questioned whether acceptable standard measures to collect SOGI data in clinical settings exist. Methods: In order to better understand how a diverse group of patients would respond if SOGI questions were asked in primary care settings, 301 randomly selected patients receiving primary care at four health centers across the U.S. were asked SOGI questions and then asked follow-up questions. This sample was mainly heterosexual, racially diverse, and geographically and regionally broad. Results: There was a strong consensus among patients surveyed about the importance of asking SOGI questions. Most of the LGBT respondents thought that the questions presented on the survey allowed them to accurately document their SOGI. Most respondents—heterosexual and LGBT—answered the questions, and said that they would answer such questions in the future. While there were some age-related differences, respondents of all ages overwhelmingly expressed support for asking SOGI questions and understood the importance of providers' knowing their patients' SOGI. Conclusions: Given current deliberations within national health care regulatory bodies and the government's increased attention to LGBT health disparities, the finding that patients can and will answer SOGI questions has important implications for public policy. This study provides evidence that integrating SOGI data collection into the meaningful use requirements is both acceptable to diverse samples of patients, including heterosexuals, and feasible.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean Cahill & Robbie Singal & Chris Grasso & Dana King & Kenneth Mayer & Kellan Baker & Harvey Makadon, 2014. "Do Ask, Do Tell: High Levels of Acceptability by Patients of Routine Collection of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data in Four Diverse American Community Health Centers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-8, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0107104
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107104&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0107104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mayer, K.H. & Bradford, J.B. & Makadon, H.J. & Stall, R. & Goldhammer, H. & Landers, S., 2008. "Sexual and gender minority health: What we know and what needs to be done," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(6), pages 989-995.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amanda K. Gilmore & Tatiana M. Davidson & Ruschelle M. Leone & Lauren B. Wray & Daniel W. Oesterle & Christine K. Hahn & Julianne C. Flanagan & Kathleen Gill-Hopple & Ron Acierno, 2019. "Usability Testing of a Mobile Health Intervention to Address Acute Care Needs after Sexual Assault," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Karinna Saxby, 2022. "Australia's LGBTIQ Research Data Landscape," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 55(2), pages 290-308, June.
    3. Erin Ziegler & Ruta Valaitis & Nancy Carter & Cathy Risdon & Jennifer Yost, 2020. "Primary Care for Transgender Individuals: A Review of the Literature Reflecting a Canadian Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, September.
    4. Ryan Combs & Monica Wendel & T. Gonzales, 2018. "Considering transgender and gender nonconforming people in health communication campaigns," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6, December.
    5. Cecilia T. Hardacker & Anna Baccellieri & Elizabeth R. Mueller & Linda Brubaker & Georgia Hutchins & Jory Luc Yimei Zhang & Jeni Hebert-Beirne, 2019. "Bladder Health Experiences, Perceptions and Knowledge of Sexual and Gender Minorities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Joseph G. L. Lee & Adam O. Goldstein & Leah M. Ranney & Jeff Crist & Anna McCullough, 2011. "High Tobacco Use among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations in West Virginian Bars and Community Festivals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Concetta P Pelullo & Gabriella Di Giuseppe & Italo F Angelillo, 2013. "Frequency of Discrimination, Harassment, and Violence in Lesbian, Gay Men, and Bisexual in Italy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-1, August.
    8. Cinzia Gradellini & Shaniko Kaleci & Margarida Sim-Sim & Hélia Dias & Daniela Mecugni & Vicki Aaberg & Sagrario Gómez-Cantarino, 2022. "Adaptation and Validation of the Sexuality Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for the Italian Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-11, October.
    9. Ashleigh Rushton & Lesley Gray & Justin Canty & Kevin Blanchard, 2019. "Beyond Binary: (Re)Defining “Gender” for 21st Century Disaster Risk Reduction Research, Policy, and Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Marta Evelia Aparicio-García & Eva María Díaz-Ramiro & Susana Rubio-Valdehita & María Inmaculada López-Núñez & Isidro García-Nieto, 2018. "Health and Well-Being of Cisgender, Transgender and Non-Binary Young People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-11, September.
    11. Kimberly A Koester & Shane P Collins & Shannon M Fuller & Gabriel R Galindo & Steven Gibson & Wayne T Steward, 2013. "Sexual Healthcare Preferences among Gay and Bisexual Men: A Qualitative Study in San Francisco, California," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, August.
    12. Janice Du Mont & Shilini Hemalal & Sarah Daisy Kosa & Lee Cameron & Sheila Macdonald, 2020. "The promise of an intersectoral network in enhancing the response to transgender survivors of sexual assault," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Tara McKay & Ellesse-Roselee Akré & Jeffrey Henne & Nitya Kari & Adam Conway & Isabel Gothelf, 2022. "LGBTQ+ Affirming Care May Increase Awareness and Understanding of Undetectable = Untransmittable among Midlife and Older Gay and Bisexual Men in the US South," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Cruz, Taylor M., 2014. "Assessing access to care for transgender and gender nonconforming people: A consideration of diversity in combating discrimination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 65-73.
    15. McNair, Ruth Patricia & Hegarty, Kelsey & Taft, Angela, 2012. "From silence to sensitivity: A new Identity Disclosure model to facilitate disclosure for same-sex attracted women in general practice consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 208-216.
    16. Muhammad Abo ul Hassan Rashid & Fatima Ghazi & Malik Maliha Manzoor, 2023. "Symbolic violence and social adjustment of transgender(s) in Pakistan," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 121-135, February.
    17. Corinne Reczek & Hui Liu & Dustin Brown, 2014. "Cigarette Smoking in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Unions: The Role of Socioeconomic and Psychological Factors," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 33(4), pages 527-551, August.
    18. Cruz, Taylor M., 2017. "The making of a population: Challenges, implications, and consequences of the quantification of social difference," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 79-85.
    19. M Eugenia Socías & Jean Shoveller & Chili Bean & Paul Nguyen & Julio Montaner & Kate Shannon, 2016. "Universal Coverage without Universal Access: Institutional Barriers to Health Care among Women Sex Workers in Vancouver, Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Ann‐Christin von Vogelsang & Camilla Milton & Ingrid Ericsson & Lars Strömberg, 2016. "‘Wouldn't it be easier if you continued to be a guy?’ – a qualitative interview study of transsexual persons’ experiences of encounters with healthcare professionals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(23-24), pages 3577-3588, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0107104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.