IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0074443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Scoring Function of Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions with Both Affinity and Specificity

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiqiang Yan
  • Jin Wang

Abstract

Protein-nucleic acid (protein-DNA and protein-RNA) recognition is fundamental to the regulation of gene expression. Determination of the structures of the protein-nucleic acid recognition and insight into their interactions at molecular level are vital to understanding the regulation function. Recently, quantitative computational approach has been becoming an alternative of experimental technique for predicting the structures and interactions of biomolecular recognition. However, the progress of protein-nucleic acid structure prediction, especially protein-RNA, is far behind that of the protein-ligand and protein-protein structure predictions due to the lack of reliable and accurate scoring function for quantifying the protein-nucleic acid interactions. In this work, we developed an accurate scoring function (named as SPA-PN, SPecificity and Affinity of the Protein-Nucleic acid interactions) for protein-nucleic acid interactions by incorporating both the specificity and affinity into the optimization strategy. Specificity and affinity are two requirements of highly efficient and specific biomolecular recognition. Previous quantitative descriptions of the biomolecular interactions considered the affinity, but often ignored the specificity owing to the challenge of specificity quantification. We applied our concept of intrinsic specificity to connect the conventional specificity, which circumvents the challenge of specificity quantification. In addition to the affinity optimization, we incorporated the quantified intrinsic specificity into the optimization strategy of SPA-PN. The testing results and comparisons with other scoring functions validated that SPA-PN performs well on both the prediction of binding affinity and identification of native conformation. In terms of its performance, SPA-PN can be widely used to predict the protein-nucleic acid structures and quantify their interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiqiang Yan & Jin Wang, 2013. "Optimizing Scoring Function of Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions with Both Affinity and Specificity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-8, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0074443
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0074443
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0074443&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0074443?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justin Ashworth & James J. Havranek & Carlos M. Duarte & Django Sussman & Raymond J. Monnat & Barry L. Stoddard & David Baker, 2006. "Computational redesign of endonuclease DNA binding and cleavage specificity," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7093), pages 656-659, June.
    2. Fyodor D. Urnov & Jeffrey C. Miller & Ya-Li Lee & Christian M. Beausejour & Jeremy M. Rock & Sheldon Augustus & Andrew C. Jamieson & Matthew H. Porteus & Philip D. Gregory & Michael C. Holmes, 2005. "Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7042), pages 646-651, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiliang Zheng & Jin Wang, 2015. "The Universal Statistical Distributions of the Affinity, Equilibrium Constants, Kinetics and Specificity in Biomolecular Recognition," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulaganathan, Kandasamy & Goud, Sravanthi & Reddy, Madhavi & Kayalvili, Ulaganathan, 2017. "Genome engineering for breaking barriers in lignocellulosic bioethanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1080-1107.
    2. Alexander M Sevy & Tim M Jacobs & James E Crowe Jr. & Jens Meiler, 2015. "Design of Protein Multi-specificity Using an Independent Sequence Search Reduces the Barrier to Low Energy Sequences," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Kayeong Lim & Sung-Ik Cho & Jin-Soo Kim, 2022. "Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA editing in human cells with zinc finger deaminases," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Md Khaledur Rahman & M Sohel Rahman, 2017. "CRISPRpred: A flexible and efficient tool for sgRNAs on-target activity prediction in CRISPR/Cas9 systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Patrick Löffler & Samuel Schmitz & Enrico Hupfeld & Reinhard Sterner & Rainer Merkl, 2017. "Rosetta:MSF: a modular framework for multi-state computational protein design," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, June.
    6. Vanessa M. Macias & Johanna R. Ohm & Jason L. Rasgon, 2017. "Gene Drive for Mosquito Control: Where Did It Come from and Where Are We Headed?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, September.
    7. Sarel J Fleishman & Andrew Leaver-Fay & Jacob E Corn & Eva-Maria Strauch & Sagar D Khare & Nobuyasu Koga & Justin Ashworth & Paul Murphy & Florian Richter & Gordon Lemmon & Jens Meiler & David Baker, 2011. "RosettaScripts: A Scripting Language Interface to the Rosetta Macromolecular Modeling Suite," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-10, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0074443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.