IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0028610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Perceived Stress Scale in Policewomen

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Wang
  • Jue Chen
  • Jennifer E Boyd
  • Haiyin Zhang
  • Xiuzhen Jia
  • Jianyin Qiu
  • Zeping Xiao

Abstract

Background: The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is one of most widely used instruments to measure a global level of perceived stress in a range of clinical and research settings. This study was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the Simplified Chinese version of the PSS-10 in policewomen. Methodology: A total of 240 policewomen were recruited in this study. The Simplified Chinese versions of the PSS-10, the Beck Depression Inventory Revised (BDI-II), and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were administered to all participants, and 36 of the participants were re-tested two weeks after the initial testing. Principal Findings: The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.86, and the test–retest reliability coefficient was 0.68. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) yielded 2 factors with eigenvalues of 4.76 and 1.48, accounting for 62.41% of variance. Factor 1 consisted of 6 items representing “negative feelings”; whereas Factor 2 consisted of 4 items representing “positive feelings”. The item loadings ranged from 0.72 to 0.83. The Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated a very good fit of this two-factor model to this sample. The PSS-10 significantly correlated with both BDI-II and BAI, indicating an acceptable concurrent validity. Conclusions: The Simplified Chinese version of the PSS-10 demonstrated adequate psychometric properties for evaluating stress levels. The results support its use among the Chinese population.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Wang & Jue Chen & Jennifer E Boyd & Haiyin Zhang & Xiuzhen Jia & Jianyin Qiu & Zeping Xiao, 2011. "Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Perceived Stress Scale in Policewomen," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-4, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0028610
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0028610
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0028610&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0028610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shu-Ling Huang & Ren-Hau Li & Feng-Ying Huang & Feng-Cheng Tang, 2015. "The Potential for Mindfulness-Based Intervention in Workplace Mental Health Promotion: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Xinguang Chen & Peigang Wang & Rhiana Wegner & Jie Gong & Xiaoyi Fang & Linda Kaljee, 2015. "Measuring Social Capital Investment: Scale Development and Examination of Links to Social Capital and Perceived Stress," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 669-687, February.
    3. Wei Lu & Qian Bian & Wenzheng Wang & Xiaoling Wu & Zhen Wang & Min Zhao, 2017. "Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale-10: A psychometric study in Chinese university students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-8, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0028610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.