IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1008449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inference of recombination maps from a single pair of genomes and its application to ancient samples

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo V. Barroso
  • Nataša Puzović
  • Julien Y Dutheil

Abstract

Understanding the causes and consequences of recombination landscape evolution is a fundamental goal in genetics that requires recombination maps from across the tree of life. Such maps can be obtained from population genomic datasets, but require large sample sizes. Alternative methods are therefore necessary to research organisms where such datasets cannot be generated easily, such as non-model or ancient species. Here we extend the sequentially Markovian coalescent model to jointly infer demography and the spatial variation in recombination rate. Using extensive simulations and sequence data from humans, fruit-flies and a fungal pathogen, we demonstrate that iSMC accurately infers recombination maps under a wide range of scenarios–remarkably, even from a single pair of unphased genomes. We exploit this possibility and reconstruct the recombination maps of ancient hominins. We report that the ancient and modern maps are correlated in a manner that reflects the established phylogeny of Neanderthals, Denisovans, and modern human populations.Author summary: In sexually-reproducing species, meiotic recombination causes the genome of each individual to be a mosaic of DNA sequences that existed in its ancestral population. As a result, genealogical ancestry changes along the genome and shapes genetic diversity. The importance of recombination in genome evolution has motivated a surge in the development of statistical tools to infer genome-wide variation in the recombination rate using polymorphism data. For the most part, however, these methods rely on relatively large sample sizes. Here, we introduce iSMC–a new tool that infers recombination maps while simultaneously modelling the demographic history. A critical improvement over existing methods is that iSMC has high accuracy using as little as a single diploid genome. Using experimentally derived recombination maps from fruit-flies and a fungal pathogen, we demonstrate that iSMC compares well to state-of-the-art methods that require larger sample sizes. We further analyse data from ancient hominins, showcasing that our method can extract information in intrinsically limited datasets. These results suggest that iSMC is a valuable tool that can foster studies in non-model organisms. Moreover, its joint-inference approach of demography and the recombination landscape represents a step towards more realistic models in population genomics.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo V. Barroso & Nataša Puzović & Julien Y Dutheil, 2019. "Inference of recombination maps from a single pair of genomes and its application to ancient samples," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1008449
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1008449
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1008449&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter D. Keightley & Sarah P. Otto, 2006. "Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations," Nature, Nature, vol. 443(7107), pages 89-92, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deng, Yun & Song, Yun S. & Nielsen, Rasmus, 2021. "The distribution of waiting distances in ancestral recombination graphs," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 34-43.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel Beltrán Del Río & Christopher R. Stephens & David A. Rosenblueth, 2015. "Fitness Landscape Epistasis And Recombination," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(07n08), pages 1-38, November.
    2. David B. Stern & Nathan W. Anderson & Juanita A. Diaz & Carol Eunmi Lee, 2022. "Genome-wide signatures of synergistic epistasis during parallel adaptation in a Baltic Sea copepod," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. MacPherson, Brian & Scott, Ryan & Gras, Robin, 2023. "Using individual-based modelling to investigate a pluralistic explanation for the prevalence of sexual reproduction in animal species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    4. Masel, Joanna & Lyttle, David N., 2011. "The consequences of rare sexual reproduction by means of selfing in an otherwise clonally reproducing species," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(4), pages 317-322.
    5. Roger D Kouyos & Gabriel E Leventhal & Trevor Hinkley & Mojgan Haddad & Jeannette M Whitcomb & Christos J Petropoulos & Sebastian Bonhoeffer, 2012. "Exploring the Complexity of the HIV-1 Fitness Landscape," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9, March.
    6. Rouzine, Igor M. & Coffin, John M., 2010. "Multi-site adaptation in the presence of infrequent recombination," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 189-204.
    7. Kermany, Amir R. & Lessard, Sabin, 2012. "Effect of epistasis and linkage on fixation probability in three-locus models: An ancestral recombination–selection graph approach," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 131-145.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1008449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.