IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting postoperative delirium assessed by the Nursing Screening Delirium Scale in the recovery room for non-cardiac surgeries without craniotomy: A retrospective study using a machine learning approach

Author

Listed:
  • Niklas Giesa
  • Stefan Haufe
  • Mario Menk
  • Björn Weiß
  • Claudia D Spies
  • Sophie K Piper
  • Felix Balzer
  • Sebastian D Boie

Abstract

Postoperative delirium (POD) contributes to severe outcomes such as death or development of dementia. Thus, it is desirable to identify vulnerable patients in advance during the perioperative phase. Previous studies mainly investigated risk factors for delirium during hospitalization and further used a linear logistic regression (LR) approach with time-invariant data. Studies have not investigated patients’ fluctuating conditions to support POD precautions. In this single-center study, we aimed to predict POD in a recovery room setting with a non-linear machine learning (ML) technique using pre-, intra-, and postoperative data. The target variable POD was defined with the Nursing Screening Delirium Scale (Nu-DESC) ≥ 1. Feature selection was conducted based on robust univariate test statistics and L1 regularization. Non-linear multi-layer perceptron (MLP) as well as tree-based models were trained and evaluated—with the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), the area under precision recall curve (AUPRC), and additional metrics—against LR and published models on bootstrapped testing data. The prevalence of POD was 8.2% in a sample of 73,181 surgeries performed between 2017 and 2020. Significant univariate impact factors were the preoperative ASA status (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system), the intraoperative amount of given remifentanil, and the postoperative Aldrete score. The best model used pre-, intra-, and postoperative data. The non-linear boosted trees model achieved a mean AUROC of 0.854 and a mean AUPRC of 0.418 outperforming linear LR, well as best applied and retrained baseline models. Overall, non-linear machine learning models using data from multiple perioperative time phases were superior to traditional ones in predicting POD in the recovery room. Class imbalance was seen as a main impediment for model application in clinical practice.Author summary: Currently, the pathophysiology of postoperative delirium (POD) is unknown. Hence, there is no dedicated medication for treatment. Many patients who experience POD suffer from chronic mental disorders causing pressure on related family members, clinicians, and the health system. With our study, we want to detect suspected POD before onset trying to give decision support to health professionals. Vulnerable patients could be transferred to a higher level of care mitigating the risk of severe outcomes such as long-term cognitive decline. We also provide insides into clinical parameters—recorded before, during, and after the surgery—that could be adapted for reducing POD risk. Our work is openly available, developed for clinical implementation, and could be transferred to other clinical institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Niklas Giesa & Stefan Haufe & Mario Menk & Björn Weiß & Claudia D Spies & Sophie K Piper & Felix Balzer & Sebastian D Boie, 2024. "Predicting postoperative delirium assessed by the Nursing Screening Delirium Scale in the recovery room for non-cardiac surgeries without craniotomy: A retrospective study using a machine learning app," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000414
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000414
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000414&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mee Young Park & Trevor Hastie, 2007. "L1‐regularization path algorithm for generalized linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 659-677, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wai-Kay Seto & Chun-Fan Lee & Ching-Lung Lai & Philip P C Ip & Daniel Yee-Tak Fong & James Fung & Danny Ka-Ho Wong & Man-Fung Yuen, 2011. "A New Model Using Routinely Available Clinical Parameters to Predict Significant Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-7, August.
    2. Bartosz Uniejewski, 2024. "Regularization for electricity price forecasting," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 34(3), pages 267-286.
    3. Bian, Yuan & Yi, Grace Y. & He, Wenqing, 2024. "A unified framework of analyzing missing data and variable selection using regularized likelihood," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    4. Dumitrescu, Elena & Hué, Sullivan & Hurlin, Christophe & Tokpavi, Sessi, 2022. "Machine learning for credit scoring: Improving logistic regression with non-linear decision-tree effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1178-1192.
    5. Zhengyong Jiang & Jeyan Thiayagalingam & Jionglong Su & Jinjun Liang, 2023. "CAD: Clustering And Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Multi-Period Portfolio Management Strategy," Papers 2310.01319, arXiv.org.
    6. Yanis Tazi & Juan E. Arango-Ossa & Yangyu Zhou & Elsa Bernard & Ian Thomas & Amanda Gilkes & Sylvie Freeman & Yoann Pradat & Sean J. Johnson & Robert Hills & Richard Dillon & Max F. Levine & Daniel Le, 2022. "Unified classification and risk-stratification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Hiroki Saishu & Kota Kudo & Yuichi Takano, 2024. "Cutting-plane algorithm for estimation of sparse Cox proportional hazards models," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(1), pages 57-82, April.
    8. Elena Ivona DUMITRESCU & Sullivan HUE & Christophe HURLIN & Sessi TOKPAVI, 2020. "Machine Learning or Econometrics for Credit Scoring: Let’s Get the Best of Both Worlds," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2839, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    9. Sardy, Sylvain & Diaz-Rodriguez, Jairo & Giacobino, Caroline, 2022. "Thresholding tests based on affine LASSO to achieve non-asymptotic nominal level and high power under sparse and dense alternatives in high dimension," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    10. Guangrui Tang & Neng Fan, 2022. "A Survey of Solution Path Algorithms for Regression and Classification Models," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 749-789, August.
    11. Dai, Wei & Tsang, Ka Wai, 2023. "A resampling approach for confidence intervals in linear time-series models after model selection," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 611(C).
    12. Baiguo An & Beibei Zhang, 2020. "Logistic regression with image covariates via the combination of L1 and Sobolev regularizations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Lyaqini, S. & Nachaoui, M. & Hadri, A., 2022. "An efficient primal-dual method for solving non-smooth machine learning problem," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Wei Zhang & Takayo Ota & Viji Shridhar & Jeremy Chien & Baolin Wu & Rui Kuang, 2013. "Network-based Survival Analysis Reveals Subnetwork Signatures for Predicting Outcomes of Ovarian Cancer Treatment," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Mao, Xiaojun & Peng, Liuhua & Wang, Zhonglei, 2022. "Nonparametric feature selection by random forests and deep neural networks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    16. Jian Huang & Yuling Jiao & Lican Kang & Jin Liu & Yanyan Liu & Xiliang Lu, 2022. "GSDAR: a fast Newton algorithm for $$\ell _0$$ ℓ 0 regularized generalized linear models with statistical guarantee," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 507-533, March.
    17. Laura Ciarloni & Sahar Hosseinian & Sylvain Monnier-Benoit & Natsuko Imaizumi & Gian Dorta & Curzio Ruegg & On behalf of the DGNP-COL-0310 Study Group, 2015. "Discovery of a 29-Gene Panel in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells for the Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomas Using High Throughput Real-Time PCR," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.