Author
Listed:
- Vinyas Harish
- Thomas G Samson
- Lori Diemert
- Ashleigh Tuite
- Muhammad Mamdani
- Kamran Khan
- Anita McGahan
- James A Shaw
- Sunit Das
- Laura C Rosella
Abstract
Cross-sector partnerships are vital for maintaining resilient health systems; however, few studies have sought to empirically assess the barriers and enablers of effective and responsible partnerships during public health emergencies. Through a qualitative, multiple case study, we analyzed 210 documents and conducted 26 interviews with stakeholders in three real-world partnerships between Canadian health organizations and private technology startups during the COVID-19 pandemic. The three partnerships involved: 1) deploying a virtual care platform to care for COVID-19 patients at one hospital, 2) deploying a secure messaging platform for physicians at another hospital, and 3) using data science to support a public health organization. Our results demonstrate that a public health emergency created time and resource pressures throughout a partnership. Given these constraints, early and sustained alignment on the core problem was critical for success. Moreover, governance processes designed for normal operations, such as procurement, were triaged and streamlined. Social learning, or the process of learning from observing others, offset some time and resource pressures. Social learning took many forms ranging from informal conversations between individuals at peer organisations (e.g., hospital chief information officers) to standing meetings at the local university’s city-wide COVID-19 response table. We also found that startups’ flexibility and understanding of the local context enabled them to play a highly valuable role in emergency response. However, pandemic fueled “hypergrowth” created risks for startups, such as introducing opportunities for deviation away from their core value proposition. Finally, we found each partnership navigated intense workloads, burnout, and personnel turnover through the pandemic. Strong partnerships required healthy, motivated teams. Visibility into and engagement in partnership governance, belief in partnership impact, and strong emotional intelligence in managers promoted team well-being. Taken together, these findings can help to bridge the theory-to-practice gap and guide effective cross-sector partnerships during public health emergencies.Author summary: Digital technologies have played a unprecedented role in emergency response during the COVID-19 pandemic. Partnerships between private sector technology companies and health institutions, such as hospitals and public health organizations, are often necessary to develop and deploy digital technologies. Here, we sought to understand the barriers and enablers to forming effective and responsible cross-sector partnerships during a public health emergency—with a focus on the role of startups. The firms we studied triaged and streamlined various governance processes (e.g., stakeholder assessment, contracting, procurement) in response to COVID-19’s time and resource pressures. Informants articulated the paramount importance of achieving early and sustained alignment on the core problem to be solved and how governance structures (e.g., connections between team members at different levels of seniority) facilitated this alignment. Flexibility and deep knowledge of the local operating context provided startups with an immense competitive advantage. Key areas for improving partnerships include: knowledge translation to promote the uptake of governance frameworks among decision-makers, accelerating public sector procurement processes that are too long and complex to be financially viable for startups, and developing pragmatic, public engagement strategies to build trust and promote social acceptability.
Suggested Citation
Vinyas Harish & Thomas G Samson & Lori Diemert & Ashleigh Tuite & Muhammad Mamdani & Kamran Khan & Anita McGahan & James A Shaw & Sunit Das & Laura C Rosella, 2022.
"Governing partnerships with technology companies as part of the COVID-19 response in Canada: A qualitative case study,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(12), pages 1-26, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000164
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000164
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Pravee Kruachottikul & Pinnaree Tea-makorn & Poomsiri Dumrongvute & Solaphat Hemrungrojn & Natawut Nupairoj & Ornsiree Junchaya & Sukrit Vinayavekhin, 2024.
"MediGate: a MedTech product innovation development process from university research to successful commercialization within emerging markets,"
Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-43, December.
- Imon Chakraborty & P. Vigneswara Ilavarasan & Sisira Edirippulige, 2025.
"What helps age-tech startups scale-up? Some insights,"
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-32, December.
- Dhir, Amandeep & N., Meenakshi & Nawaz, Rabiya & Kaur, Puneet, 2024.
"How do we pivot? Facilitators, inhibitors, and strategies of tech healthcare startups before, during, and after a crisis,"
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
- Miguel Torres-Ruiz & Rolando Quintero & Giovanni Guzman & Kwok Tai Chui, 2022.
"Healthcare Recommender System Based on Medical Specialties, Patient Profiles, and Geospatial Information,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
- Chakraborty, Imon & Nandhini, K. & Ilavarasan, P. Vigneswara & Edirippulige, Sisira, 2024.
"Factors of front-end innovation in fem-tech startups: An empirical study,"
Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.