IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1013056.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of symmetry in local learning rules on predictive neural representations and generalization in spatial navigation

Author

Listed:
  • Janis Keck
  • Caswell Barry
  • Christian F Doeller
  • Jürgen Jost

Abstract

In spatial cognition, the Successor Representation (SR) from reinforcement learning provides a compelling candidate of how predictive representations are used to encode space. In particular, hippocampal place cells are hypothesized to encode the SR. Here, we investigate how varying the temporal symmetry in learning rules influences those representations. To this end, we use a simple local learning rule which can be made insensitive to the temporal order. We analytically find that a symmetric learning rule results in a successor representation under a symmetrized version of the experienced transition structure. We then apply this rule to a two-layer neural network model loosely resembling hippocampal subfields CA3 - with a symmetric learning rule and recurrent weights - and CA1 - with an asymmetric learning rule and no recurrent weights. Here, when exposed repeatedly to a linear track, neurons in our model in CA3 show less shift of the centre of mass than those in CA1, in line with existing empirical findings. Investigating the functional benefits of such symmetry, we employ a simple reinforcement learning agent which may learn symmetric or classical successor representations. Here, we find that using a symmetric learning rule yields representations which afford better generalization, when the agent is probed to navigate to a new target without relearning the SR. This effect is reversed when the state space is not symmetric anymore. Thus, our results hint at a potential benefit of the inductive bias afforded by symmetric learning rules in areas employed in spatial navigation, where there naturally is a symmetry in the state space.Author summary: The hippocampus is a brain region which plays a crucial role in spatial navigation for both animals and humans. Contemporarily, it’s thought to store predictive representations of the environment, functioning like maps that indicate the likelihood of visiting certain locations in the future. In our study, we used an artificial neural network model to learn these predictive representations by adjusting synaptic connections between neurons according to local learning rules. Unlike previous research, our model includes learning rules that are invariant to the temporal order of events, meaning they are symmetric with respect to the reversal of input timings. This approach produces predictive representations particularly useful for understanding spatial relationships, as navigating from one point to another is often equivalent to the reverse. Our model offers additional insights: it replicates observed properties of hippocampal cells and helps an artificial agent solve navigation tasks. The agent trained with our model not only learns to navigate but also generalizes better to new targets compared to traditional models. Our findings suggest that symmetric learning rules enhance the brain’s ability to create useful predictive maps for problems which are inherently symmetric, as is navigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Janis Keck & Caswell Barry & Christian F Doeller & Jürgen Jost, 2025. "Impact of symmetry in local learning rules on predictive neural representations and generalization in spatial navigation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-37, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013056
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013056
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013056&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evan M Russek & Ida Momennejad & Matthew M Botvinick & Samuel J Gershman & Nathaniel D Daw, 2017. "Predictive representations can link model-based reinforcement learning to model-free mechanisms," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-35, September.
    2. Torkel Hafting & Marianne Fyhn & Sturla Molden & May-Britt Moser & Edvard I. Moser, 2005. "Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 436(7052), pages 801-806, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isabella C. Wagner & Luise P. Graichen & Boryana Todorova & Andre Lüttig & David B. Omer & Matthias Stangl & Claus Lamm, 2023. "Entorhinal grid-like codes and time-locked network dynamics track others navigating through space," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Taylor J. Malone & Nai-Wen Tien & Yan Ma & Lian Cui & Shangru Lyu & Garret Wang & Duc Nguyen & Kai Zhang & Maxym V. Myroshnychenko & Jean Tyan & Joshua A. Gordon & David A. Kupferschmidt & Yi Gu, 2024. "A consistent map in the medial entorhinal cortex supports spatial memory," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Louis-Emmanuel Martinet & Denis Sheynikhovich & Karim Benchenane & Angelo Arleo, 2011. "Spatial Learning and Action Planning in a Prefrontal Cortical Network Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Qiming Shao & Ligu Chen & Xiaowan Li & Miao Li & Hui Cui & Xiaoyue Li & Xinran Zhao & Yuying Shi & Qiang Sun & Kaiyue Yan & Guangfu Wang, 2024. "A non-canonical visual cortical-entorhinal pathway contributes to spatial navigation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Fabian Kessler & Julia Frankenstein & Constantin A. Rothkopf, 2024. "Human navigation strategies and their errors result from dynamic interactions of spatial uncertainties," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Alexander Thomas Keinath, 2016. "The Preferred Directions of Conjunctive Grid X Head Direction Cells in the Medial Entorhinal Cortex Are Periodically Organized," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, March.
    7. Toon Van de Maele & Bart Dhoedt & Tim Verbelen & Giovanni Pezzulo, 2024. "A hierarchical active inference model of spatial alternation tasks and the hippocampal-prefrontal circuit," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Jaron T Colas & Wolfgang M Pauli & Tobias Larsen & J Michael Tyszka & John P O’Doherty, 2017. "Distinct prediction errors in mesostriatal circuits of the human brain mediate learning about the values of both states and actions: evidence from high-resolution fMRI," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-32, October.
    9. Netto, Vinicius M. & Brigatti, Edgardo & Meirelles, João & Ribeiro, Fabiano L. & Pace, Bruno & Cacholas, Caio & Sanches, Patricia Mara, 2018. "Cities, from information to interaction," SocArXiv jgz5d, Center for Open Science.
    10. Davide Spalla & Alessandro Treves & Charlotte N. Boccara, 2022. "Angular and linear speed cells in the parahippocampal circuits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Tristan Baumann & Hanspeter A Mallot, 2023. "Metric information in cognitive maps: Euclidean embedding of non-Euclidean environments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Gillian Coughlan & William Plumb & Peter Zhukovsky & Min Hane Aung & Michael Hornberger, 2023. "Vestibular contribution to path integration deficits in ‘at-genetic-risk’ for Alzheimer’s disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-12, January.
    13. Torsten Neher & Amir Hossein Azizi & Sen Cheng, 2017. "From grid cells to place cells with realistic field sizes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, July.
    14. Hristina Ivanova Zlatanova & Maria Todorova Georgieva-Kotetarova & Natalia Borisova Vilmosh & Ilin Kostadinov Kandilarov, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effect of Cariprazine on Memory and Cognition in Experimental Rodent Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-11, November.
    15. Xiaoyang Long & Daniel Bush & Bin Deng & Neil Burgess & Sheng-Jia Zhang, 2025. "Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations coexist in rodent medial entorhinal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Lukas Grossberger & Francesco P Battaglia & Martin Vinck, 2018. "Unsupervised clustering of temporal patterns in high-dimensional neuronal ensembles using a novel dissimilarity measure," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-34, July.
    17. Alexander Nitsch & Mona M. Garvert & Jacob L. S. Bellmund & Nicolas W. Schuck & Christian F. Doeller, 2024. "Grid-like entorhinal representation of an abstract value space during prospective decision making," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Irina Barnaveli & Simone Viganò & Daniel Reznik & Patrick Haggard & Christian F. Doeller, 2025. "Hippocampal-entorhinal cognitive maps and cortical motor system represent action plans and their outcomes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Wenhan Luo & Di Yun & Yi Hu & Miaomiao Tian & Jiajun Yang & Yifan Xu & Yong Tang & Yang Zhan & Hong Xie & Ji-Song Guan, 2022. "Acquiring new memories in neocortex of hippocampal-lesioned mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Soraya L. S. Dunn & Stephen M. Town & Jennifer K. Bizley & Daniel Bendor, 2022. "Behaviourally modulated hippocampal theta oscillations in the ferret persist during both locomotion and immobility," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.