IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1012166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ten recommendations for hosting a Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) journal club

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Efraín Díaz
  • Stephanie A Wankowicz

Abstract

Despite advances and social progress, the exclusion of diverse groups in academia, especially science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, across the US and Europe persists, resulting in the underrepresentation of diverse people in higher education. There is extensive literature about theory, observation, and evidence-based practices that can help create a more equitable, inclusive, and diverse learning environment. In this article, we propose the implementation of a Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) journal club as a strategic initiative to foster education and promote action towards making academia a more equitable institution. By creating a space for people to engage with DEIJ theories* and strategize ways to improve their learning environment, we hope to normalize the practice and importance of analyzing academia through an equity lens. Guided by restorative justice principles, we offer 10 recommendations for fostering community cohesion through education and mutual understanding. This approach underscores the importance of appropriate action and self-education in the journey toward a more diverse, equitable, inclusive, and just academic environment.*Authors’ note: We understand that “DEIJ” is a multidisciplinary organizational framework that relies on numerous fields of study, including history, sociology, philosophy, and more. We use this term to refer to these different fields of study for brevity purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Efraín Díaz & Stephanie A Wankowicz, 2024. "Ten recommendations for hosting a Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) journal club," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012166
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012166
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012166&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah W Davies & Hollie M Putnam & Tracy Ainsworth & Julia K Baum & Colleen B Bove & Sarah C Crosby & Isabelle M Côté & Anne Duplouy & Robinson W Fulweiler & Alyssa J Griffin & Torrance C Hanley & Tes, 2021. "Promoting inclusive metrics of success and impact to dismantle a discriminatory reward system in science," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Auditing the ‘Social’ of Quantum Technologies: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-38, March.
    2. Tekwa, EW & Giles, Rachel K & Davis, Alexandra CD, 2022. "Theoretical foundation and empirical assessment of representation and meritocracy in academia," SocArXiv 4bd9r_v1, Center for Open Science.
    3. Anastasia Rogova & Isabel Martinez Leal & Maggie Britton & Shine Chang & Kamisha H. Escoto & Kayce D. Solari Williams & Crystal Roberson & Lorna H. McNeill & Lorraine R. Reitzel, 2022. "Promoting Cancer Health Equity: A Qualitative Study of Mentee and Mentor Perspectives of a Training Program for Underrepresented Scholars in Cancer Health Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Jason A Papin & Jessica Keim-Malpass & Sana Syed, 2022. "Ten simple rules for launching an academic research career," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-6, December.
    5. Wei Fu & Shin-Yi Chou & Li-San Wang, 2022. "NIH Grant Expansion, Ancestral Diversity and Scientific Discovery in Genomics Research," NBER Working Papers 30155, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Brielle Lillywhite & Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Emergency and Disaster Management, Preparedness, and Planning (EDMPP) and the ‘Social’: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-50, October.
    7. Gregor Wolbring & Maria Escobedo, 2023. "Academic Coverage of Social Stressors Experienced by Disabled People: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-31, September.
    8. Erin V Satterthwaite & Valeriya Komyakova & Natalia G Erazo & Louise Gammage & Gabriel A Juma & Rachel Kelly & Daniel Kleinman & Delphine Lobelle & Rachel Sapery James & Norlaila Binti Mohd Zanuri, 2022. "Five actionable pillars to engage the next generation of leaders in the co-design of transformative ocean solutions," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Stefano Mammola & Elena Piano & Alberto Doretto & Enrico Caprio & Dan Chamberlain, 2022. "Measuring the influence of non-scientific features on citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 4123-4137, July.
    10. Juliana Hipólito & Leila Teruko Shirai & Rosana Halinski & Aline Sartori Guidolin & Ranyse Barbosa Querino & Eliane Dias Quintela & Nivia da Silva Dias Pini & Carmen Sílvia Soares Pires & Eliana Maria, 2022. "Brazilian female researchers do not publish less despite an academic structure that deepens sex gap," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Marcus Goncalves & Suela Papagelis & Daphne Nicolitsas, 2025. "Drivers for Women Entrepreneurship in Greece: A Case Analysis of Early-Stage Companies," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-38, January.
    12. Simerta Gill & Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Auditing the ‘Social’ Using Conventions, Declarations, and Goal Setting Documents: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-100, October.
    13. Gregor Wolbring & Aspen Lillywhite, 2023. "Burnout through the Lenses of Equity/Equality, Diversity and Inclusion and Disabled People: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, May.
    14. Katie Wilson & Chun-Kai (Karl) Huang & Lucy Montgomery & Cameron Neylon & Rebecca N. Handcock & Alkim Ozaygen & Aniek Roelofs, 2022. "Changing the Academic Gender Narrative through Open Access," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.