IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1008153.html

Understanding multivariate brain activity: Evaluating the effect of voxelwise noise correlations on population codes in functional magnetic resonance imaging

Author

Listed:
  • Ru-Yuan Zhang
  • Xue-Xin Wei
  • Kendrick Kay

Abstract

Previous studies in neurophysiology have shown that neurons exhibit trial-by-trial correlated activity and that such noise correlations (NCs) greatly impact the accuracy of population codes. Meanwhile, multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) has become a mainstream approach in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), but it remains unclear how NCs between voxels influence MVPA performance. Here, we tackle this issue by combining voxel-encoding modeling and MVPA. We focus on a well-established form of NC, tuning-compatible noise correlation (TCNC), whose sign and magnitude are systematically related to the tuning similarity between two units. We show that this form of voxelwise NCs can improve MVPA performance if NCs are sufficiently strong. We also confirm these results using standard information-theoretic analyses in computational neuroscience. In the same theoretical framework, we further demonstrate that the effects of noise correlations at both the neuronal level and the voxel level may manifest differently in typical fMRI data, and their effects are modulated by tuning heterogeneity. Our results provide a theoretical foundation to understand the effect of correlated activity on population codes in macroscopic fMRI data. Our results also suggest that future fMRI research could benefit from a closer examination of the correlational structure of multivariate responses, which is not directly revealed by conventional MVPA approaches.Author summary: Noise correlation (NC) is the key component of multivariate response distributions and thus characterizing its effects on population codes is the cornerstone for understanding probabilistic computation in the brain. Despite extensive studies of NCs in neurophysiology, little is known with respect to their role in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We characterize the effect of voxelwise NC by building voxel-encoding models and directly quantifying the amount of information in simulated multivariate fMRI data. In contrast to the detrimental effects of NC implied in neurophysiological studies, we find that voxelwise NCs can enhance information codes if NC is sufficiently strong. Our work highlights the important role of noise correlations in decipher population codes using fMRI.

Suggested Citation

  • Ru-Yuan Zhang & Xue-Xin Wei & Kendrick Kay, 2020. "Understanding multivariate brain activity: Evaluating the effect of voxelwise noise correlations on population codes in functional magnetic resonance imaging," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-29, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008153
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008153
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008153&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008153?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vikranth R Bejjanki & Rava Azeredo da Silveira & Jonathan D Cohen & Nicholas B Turk-Browne, 2017. "Noise correlations in the human brain and their impact on pattern classification," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Ingmar Kanitscheider & Ruben Coen-Cagli & Adam Kohn & Alexandre Pouget, 2015. "Measuring Fisher Information Accurately in Correlated Neural Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Diego A. Gutnisky & Valentin Dragoi, 2008. "Adaptive coding of visual information in neural populations," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7184), pages 220-224, March.
    4. repec:abf:journl:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:24261-24266 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu-Ang Cheng & Mehdi Sanayei & Xing Chen & Ke Jia & Sheng Li & Fang Fang & Takeo Watanabe & Alexander Thiele & Ru-Yuan Zhang, 2025. "A neural geometry approach comprehensively explains apparently conflicting models of visual perceptual learning," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(5), pages 1023-1040, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Anne-Marie M Oswald & Nathaniel N Urban & Brent Doiron, 2011. "Balanced Synaptic Input Shapes the Correlation between Neural Spike Trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Wensheng Sun & Dennis L Barbour, 2017. "Rate, not selectivity, determines neuronal population coding accuracy in auditory cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Caroline Haimerl & Douglas A. Ruff & Marlene R. Cohen & Cristina Savin & Eero P. Simoncelli, 2023. "Targeted V1 comodulation supports task-adaptive sensory decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Alexander Anders & Bhaswar Ghosh & Timo Glatter & Victor Sourjik, 2020. "Design of a MAPK signalling cascade balances energetic cost versus accuracy of information transmission," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Sunny Nigam & Russell Milton & Sorin Pojoga & Valentin Dragoi, 2023. "Adaptive coding across visual features during free-viewing and fixation conditions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Jerome Carriot & Graham McAllister & Hamed Hooshangnejad & Isabelle Mackrous & Kathleen E. Cullen & Maurice J. Chacron, 2022. "Sensory adaptation mediates efficient and unambiguous encoding of natural stimuli by vestibular thalamocortical pathways," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Jean-Paul Noel & Edoardo Balzani & Cristina Savin & Dora E. Angelaki, 2024. "Context-invariant beliefs are supported by dynamic reconfiguration of single unit functional connectivity in prefrontal cortex of male macaques," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Geoffrey Terral & Evan Harrell & Gabriel Lepousez & Yohan Wards & Dinghuang Huang & Tiphaine Dolique & Giulio Casali & Antoine Nissant & Pierre-Marie Lledo & Guillaume Ferreira & Giovanni Marsicano & , 2024. "Endogenous cannabinoids in the piriform cortex tune olfactory perception," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Zeyuan Ye & Ralf Wessel, 2025. "Speed modulations in grid cell information geometry," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. repec:plo:pcbi00:1003415 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Qianli Yang & Edgar Walker & R. James Cotton & Andreas S. Tolias & Xaq Pitkow, 2021. "Revealing nonlinear neural decoding by analyzing choices," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Christopher F. Angeloni & Wiktor Młynarski & Eugenio Piasini & Aaron M. Williams & Katherine C. Wood & Linda Garami & Ann M. Hermundstad & Maria N. Geffen, 2023. "Dynamics of cortical contrast adaptation predict perception of signals in noise," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Rava Azeredo da Silveira & Michael J Berry II, 2014. "High-Fidelity Coding with Correlated Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.
    14. Yu-Ang Cheng & Mehdi Sanayei & Xing Chen & Ke Jia & Sheng Li & Fang Fang & Takeo Watanabe & Alexander Thiele & Ru-Yuan Zhang, 2025. "A neural geometry approach comprehensively explains apparently conflicting models of visual perceptual learning," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(5), pages 1023-1040, May.
    15. Arno Onken & Valentin Dragoi & Klaus Obermayer, 2012. "A Maximum Entropy Test for Evaluating Higher-Order Correlations in Spike Counts," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-12, June.
    16. Amirhossein Farzmahdi & Adam Kohn & Ruben Coen-Cagli, 2025. "Relating natural image statistics to patterns of response covariability in macaque primary visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. M. Agustina Frechou & Sunaina S. Martin & Kelsey D. McDermott & Evan A. Huaman & Şölen Gökhan & Wolfgang A. Tomé & Ruben Coen-Cagli & J. Tiago Gonçalves, 2024. "Adult neurogenesis improves spatial information encoding in the mouse hippocampus," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Elaine Tring & Mario Dipoppa & Dario L. Ringach, 2023. "A power law describes the magnitude of adaptation in neural populations of primary visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Vikranth R Bejjanki & Rava Azeredo da Silveira & Jonathan D Cohen & Nicholas B Turk-Browne, 2017. "Noise correlations in the human brain and their impact on pattern classification," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, August.
    20. Sorin Pojoga & Ariana Andrei & Valentin Dragoi, 2025. "Unsupervised learning of temporal regularities in visual cortical populations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    21. Ingmar Kanitscheider & Ruben Coen-Cagli & Adam Kohn & Alexandre Pouget, 2015. "Measuring Fisher Information Accurately in Correlated Neural Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.