Author
Listed:
- Yu-Ang Cheng
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and School of Psychology
Brown University)
- Mehdi Sanayei
(Framlington Place
Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences)
- Xing Chen
(University of Pittsburgh)
- Ke Jia
(Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Zhejiang University
Zhejiang University)
- Sheng Li
(Peking University
Peking University
Peking University)
- Fang Fang
(Peking University
Peking University
Peking University
Peking University)
- Takeo Watanabe
(Brown University)
- Alexander Thiele
(Framlington Place)
- Ru-Yuan Zhang
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and School of Psychology)
Abstract
Visual perceptual learning (VPL), defined as long-term improvement in a visual task, is considered a crucial tool for elucidating underlying visual and brain plasticity. Previous studies have proposed several neural models of VPL, including changes in neural tuning or in noise correlations. Here, to adjudicate different models, we propose that all neural changes at single units can be conceptualized as geometric transformations of population response manifolds in a high-dimensional neural space. Following this neural geometry approach, we identified neural manifold shrinkage due to reduced trial-by-trial population response variability, rather than tuning or correlation changes, as the primary mechanism of VPL. Furthermore, manifold shrinkage successfully explains VPL effects across artificial neural responses in deep neural networks, multivariate blood-oxygenation-level-dependent signals in humans and multiunit activities in monkeys. These converging results suggest that our neural geometry approach comprehensively explains a wide range of empirical results and reconciles previously conflicting models of VPL.
Suggested Citation
Yu-Ang Cheng & Mehdi Sanayei & Xing Chen & Ke Jia & Sheng Li & Fang Fang & Takeo Watanabe & Alexander Thiele & Ru-Yuan Zhang, 2025.
"A neural geometry approach comprehensively explains apparently conflicting models of visual perceptual learning,"
Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(5), pages 1023-1040, May.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nathum:v:9:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1038_s41562-025-02149-x
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-025-02149-x
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:9:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1038_s41562-025-02149-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.