IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ten Simple Rules for a successful remote postdoc

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin R Burgio
  • Caitlin McDonough MacKenzie
  • Stephanie B Borrelle
  • S K Morgan Ernest
  • Jacquelyn L Gill
  • Kurt E Ingeman
  • Amy Teffer
  • Ethan P White

Abstract

Author summary: Postdocs are a critical transition for early-career researchers. This transient period, between finishing a PhD and finding a permanent position, is when early-career researchers develop independent research programs and establish collaborative relationships that can make a successful career. Traditionally, postdocs physically relocate—sometimes multiple times—for these short-term appointments, which creates challenges that can disproportionately affect members of traditionally underrepresented groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). However, many research activities involving analytical and quantitative work do not require a physical presence in a lab and can be accomplished remotely. Other fields have embraced remote work, yet many academics have been hesitant to hire remote postdocs. In this article, we present advice to both principal investigators (PIs) and postdocs for successfully navigating a remote position. Using the combined experience of the authors (as either remote postdocs or employers of remote postdocs), we provide a road map to overcome the real (and perceived) obstacles associated with remote work. With planning, communication, and creativity, remote postdocs can be a fully functioning and productive member of a research lab. Further, our rules can be useful for research labs generally and can help foster a more flexible and inclusive environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin R Burgio & Caitlin McDonough MacKenzie & Stephanie B Borrelle & S K Morgan Ernest & Jacquelyn L Gill & Kurt E Ingeman & Amy Teffer & Ethan P White, 2020. "Ten Simple Rules for a successful remote postdoc," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-9, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007809
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007809
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007809&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernando T Maestre, 2019. "Ten simple rules towards healthier research labs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-8, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cameron Mura & Mike Chalupa & Abigail M Newbury & Jack Chalupa & Philip E Bourne, 2020. "Ten simple rules for starting research in your late teens," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Zellmer-Bruhn, Mary E. & Forbes, Daniel P. & Sapienza, Harry J. & Borchert, Patricia S., 2021. "Lab, Gig or Enterprise? How scientist-inventors form nascent startup teams," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).
    3. Nigel Golden & Kadambari Devarajan & Cathleen Balantic & Joseph Drake & Michael T Hallworth & Toni Lyn Morelli, 2021. "Ten simple rules for productive lab meetings," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Carol Nash, 2022. "Self-Direction in Physics Graduate Education: Insights for STEM from David J. Rowe’s Career-Long Methods," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Kevin A Janes, 2021. "Ten simple rules for being a faculty advocate of first-year graduate students," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-6, September.
    6. Carol Nash, 2021. "Improving Mentorship and Supervision during COVID-19 to Reduce Graduate Student Anxiety and Depression Aided by an Online Commercial Platform Narrative Research Group," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.